NEWS
EXCLUSIVE

Gwyneth Paltrow NOT Engaged, Despite Ring Photos On “Avengers” Set

Truth rating: 0
Gwyneth Paltrow Not engaged

By Shari Weiss |

Gwyneth Paltrow Not engaged

(Gwyneth Paltrow/Instagram)

Gwyneth Paltrow is not engaged, despite photos showing her wearing a purported engagement ring on the set of the new Avengers film. A rep confirms to Gossip Cop exclusively that the actress and boyfriend Brad Falchuk are not set to wed.

Speculation was sparked on Wednesday after the Daily Mail published paparazzi photos of Paltrow on the Georgia set of the highly-anticipated superhero movie. The British tabloid blared on its website, “PICTURE EXCLUSIVE: Make-up free Gwyneth Paltrow rehearses on set with Robert Downey Jr confirming she WILL star in Avengers 4… (and is that a new ring on her finger?)” Indeed, the star appears to be wearing a large, possibly diamond, ring on her left hand.

The pictures led People to ask, “Is Gwyneth Paltrow (or Pepper Potts) Engaged? She’s Back on Avengers Set — with a Ring.” The magazine’s story begins, “Pepper Potts is back in action — and some bling on Gwyneth Paltrow’s finger sparked buzz.” The piece goes on to note the actress was “wearing a large ring on her finger as she rehearsed lines with Downey and Hulk actor Mark Ruffalo,” even though “sources have previously… said the two aren’t engaged.” The outlet further pointed out that “Paltrow was spotted wearing a different, sizeable diamond engagement ring while filming in character,” leaving open the question about the ring she wore in rehearsal and whether that meant she’s marrying Falchuk.

Well, Gossip Cop can solve the mystery: “She is not personally engaged,” Paltrow’s spokesperson exclusively tells us. As for her on-screen alter-ego, an engagement for Potts and Downey’s Tony Stark is certainly a possibility, as fans who have seen Spider-Man: Homecoming can attest. Notably, this isn’t the first time Paltrow has been at the center of false engagement rumors.

Nearly a year ago, Gossip Cop busted The Sun, another British tabloid, when it wrongly claimed Paltrow and Falchuk were engaged because she was allegedly “flashing an impressive sparkler on that finger” and supposedly referred to the producer “as her fiancé at a party.” At the time, a rep assured us the story was “completely fabricated.” All these months later, the couple remains together happily unwed.

Share The Facts
People
Magazine


Gwyneth Paltrow may be engaged because she wore a ring on the “Avengers” set.

 


  1. Gossip Cop
  2. Mediaite
  3. LawNewz
  4. The Mary Sue