1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Busting bad dish!

“Sex and the City 3″

Claim: Sarah Jessica Parker upset with “Sex” writer

Truth rating: 3
(GettyImages.com)

According to the National Enquirer, “Sarah Jessica Parker made no bones about blaming lackluster fan response to ‘Sex and the City 2′ on just ONE man – veteran director/writer Michael Patrick King, who helmed the prior ‘Sex’ flick and many of the TV episodes.”

The tab quotes a so-called “source” as saying, “Don’t look for Michael on future projects – SJP feels he’s lost his hit-making touch.” Is she really upset?

Kristin Davis is unhappy with her “sex” positioning

Truth rating: 0
(GettyImages.com)

“Beef up my role or else!” is what News of the World claims Kristin Davis has threatened.

According to the tab, Davis is none too happy that her character’s role in Sex and the City 2 was “severely cut down.”

“Now she is said to be demanding a bigger slice of the plotline before committing to a new production,” reports the paper. True? Not true?

Perez Hilton is quite a bit premature with “Sex”

Truth rating: 0
(PerezHilton.com)

In a post titled, “More Sex Already?” Perez Hilton writes that “a third Sex and the City film will begin shooting soon!”

He explains, “The reason behind the rush is to get the third movie done before the gals – Kim Cattrall, Kristin Davis, Cynthia Nixon and Sarah Jessica Parker – look too old!” Is that true?

Story claiming “Sex and the City 3″ is also in production is out of order

Truth rating: 0

According to the British edition of OK!, a third “Sex and the City” film is being shot at the same time as the second, explaining why certain scenes won’t be in the sequel. Also, OK! claims that the stars wanted it shot back-to-back so that they wouldn’t appear older onscreen. Really?

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities