(OK!)

“Sandra’s Hookup with Ryan Reynolds’ Best Friend!” blares the cover of OK! magazine, which claims Sandra Bullock is dating Reynolds’ business partner, Jonathon Komack Martin.

The mag says that Bullock and Martin, a film producer, were spotted together at “a private party at an L.A. townhouse” on January 22, quoting a onlooker as saying, “Jonathon was very attentive to Sandra. He didn’t leave her side all afternoon.”

Although they’ve been friends for years, the actress has supposedly “been spending more and more time with him” of late, which the tabloid says has “got everyone talking.”

And that includes Reynolds, says OK!

A supposed “insider” for the mag claims, “Ryan isn’t annoyed or angry about Sandy spending so much time with Jonathon, but it’s a surprise to him.”

And to Bullock herself – because NONE of it is true.

Bullock tells Gossip Cop exclusively, ”For over a decade now, I have been so lucky to have Jonathon and Ryan as my friends, and I agree with the reports that they are both very handsome and a great catch!”

She continues, “But the only man who has stolen my heart is my son. And for now I wouldn’t have it any other way!”

Hopefully, the tabloids will finally accept that Bullock is happily single, and that she and Reynolds are and have always been just friends.

Baby Louis is one lucky little guy!

Check out PHOTOS of Sandra & baby Louis in Beverly Hills!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

According to OK! magazine, Justin Theroux is “desperate to win back Jennifer Aniston.”

The tabloid explains that what been an idyllic relationship turned ugly over the holidays, when “tensions bubbled over and nearly tore the couple apart.”

At the heart of the alleged conflict was Aniston’s supposed disappointment in Theroux not proposing to her by the end of the year.

An “inside source” tells OK!, “It’s been a nightmare few weeks for Jen and Justin.”

Theroux is now “begging for a reprieve,” claims the mag.

“He’s freaked out, terrified that he’s going to lose her,” explains the so-called “source,” adding that Theroux is looking frantically for an engagement ring and planning an “epic” proposal “to make up for acting like such a jerk.”

Uh-huh.

Please allow Gossip Cop to introduce some reality into this sequence of events.

Back in December, OK! claimed that Aniston and Theroux were going to elope in upstate New York over New Year’s.

But that was never the case, and Gossip Cop busted the 100% wrong story.

Then, tabloids started circulating the rumor that there was some horrible blowout between Aniston and Theroux during their holiday trip to Colorado.

That was a fabrication, too.

Now, OK! is trying to make everyone forget that the mag wrongly predicted a New Year’s elopement by publishing a new story about Theroux supposedly proposing to Aniston to make up for a terrible fight that never happened.

A source close to Aniston tells Gossip Cop, “None of this is true.”

Check out PHOTOS of Jen & Justin at the Directors Guild Awards!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

OK! magazine claims Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony are “on the cusp of a romantic reunion!”

Because the former couple seemed comfortable with each other at a recent press event for their talent competition show, “Q’Viva! – The Chosen,” the tabloid speculates that a reconciliation is in the works.

A so-called “source” explains that Anthony “still believes that Jen is his soul mate,” and that their twins, Max and Emme, “should be the glue that holds them together.”

OK! says that jealousy, even more than their children, could drive the exes back together.

“Jennifer’s relationship with Casper Smart has been a huge blow” to Anthony, alleges a mag source, who explains that he began to date Shannon De Lima as retaliation “to make Jennifer jealous… [and] it actually may be working.”

Their kids and the fact that they “hate seeing each other with young, hot-bodied lovers” are paving the way for a reunion, reports OK!

We’ve been down this road before.

As soon as J. Lo and Anthony split, the next big twist tabloids sought was their potential reconciliation.

But the couple is not getting back together as a romantic pair.

They’re not putting their divorce “on hold” because of religious pressure, and they’re not racing “back into each other’s arms,” as OK! claims.

A source close to Anthony assures Gossip Cop once again that he and Lopez have no plans to reconcile, and that tabloid reports to the contrary simply are not true.

Check out PHOTOS of JLo leaving her hotel in NYC!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

Jessica Biel and Justin Timberlake are engaged and happy – which means OK! magazine is not.

Desperate to find something negative to say about the couple’s holiday engagement, the tabloid hits upon the idea of calling their union “doomed.”

“She may have gotten the proposal she’s been waiting years for, but [Biel's] friends fear she won’t get the happily ever after,” declares OK!

What’s the problem?

Apparently, Timberlake’s alleged womanizing.

“He’s been linked to so many women, from Olivia Wilde to Mila Kunis and even Ashley Olsen,” explains a so-called “insider,” who adds that Biel “knows she has to take the good with the bad.”

The actress has supposedly told friends “she knows he’s got a roving eye but she’s prepared to look the other way if he should ever stray.”

We’re very confused.

Timberlake has been (wrongly) “linked” to other women, and Biel (allegedly) is fine with it?

The magazine then goes on to say that Biel’s friends worry that Timberlake treats her “like a doormat.”

Wait, so we’re all supposed to believe that Biel knows he allegedly womanizes, but still accepted Timberlake’s marriage proposal?

This story is totally ridiculous, and a source close to the couple assures Gossip Cop, “Of course it isn’t true.”

Check out PHOTOS of Jessica & Justin through the years!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

(GettyImages)

Angelina Jolie is allegedly hoping to beat Jennifer Aniston to the delivery room with a “plot to steal Jen’s baby joy.”

According to OK! magazine, Jolie is “fiercely competitive” with Aniston, not only because of Brad Pitt “but also over the romantic comedy queen’s massive, generally positive press coverage.”

The tabloid insists that her rivalry with Aniston is leading Jolie to move forward with her baby plans.

“Don’t get me wrong, Angie’s having a child because she wants one,” explains a so-called “insider” for the mag. “But part of her can’t wait to steal Jen’s thunder.”

The “source” adds that Jolie “knows a Brangelina baby would be the best revenge of all.”

OK! says the question for Aniston now is “Will Angelina psych her out?”

“She’s sick of getting calls asking her if she knows about Brangelina baby number seven,” says a so-called “friend” of Aniston. “It’s a real kick in the teeth.”

Uh-huh.

It’s time to douse these tabloid flames with some reality.

Contrary to reports, Aniston and Justin Theroux are not expecting a baby.

And contrary to OK! mag’s own drivel, Jolie and Pitt have no timetable for another baby.

Last September, the shaky tabloid announced in a cover story that Jolie and Aniston were “racing” to the altar, trying to outdo each other with weddings before the end of 2011.

That never happened, of course, because OK! fabricated the whole thing.

It’s the same case with this new story about Jolie trying to have a baby before Aniston.

Sources close to both parties tell Gossip Cop – again – that there are NO PLANS for pregnancy for either star.

It’s time for OK! to “plot” a more believable report.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

“Jen’s Secret New Year’s Elopement!” reads a headline from OK! magazine, which claims Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux are planning to tie the knot in upstate New York some time this week.

A so-called “insider” for the tab divulges, “They are both incredibly excited; Jen can’t believe it’s actually happening!” noting, “They’re writing their own vows, and she’s already rewritten hers countless times.”

According to this same source, eloping to upstate New York is ideal for Theroux because “his friends and family are mostly on the East Coast, so they can have a party right after the wedding.”

The alleged “insider” also claims to know all about Aniston’s “classic” wedding dress, describing her top two choices as “a caramel shift design and an off-white column style, both by Carolina Herrera.”

“Jen’s longtime hairdresser, Chris McMillan, will do her hair, and Justin’s pal Terry Richardson will take photos,” adds the source.

On the wedding guest list, says the mag, are “Jen and Justin’s mutual pals like Ben Stiller and his wife, Christine Taylor, as well as Robert Downey, Jr.,” and Aniston’s close friend Chelsea Handler.

We’re starting to wonder if OK! is also on the guest list, considering how many intimate “details” about the alleged ceremony they claim to know.

Now that’s a laugh.

Regardless, a rep for Aniston tells Gossip Cop, “It’s all made up.”

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

“Angie’s Shocking Baby News,” blares the OK! magazine headline this week, promising a bombshell about Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s family.

So what’s the big scoop?

According to the tabloid, Jolie and Pitt “want a new baby in 2012.”

Wait, that’s the “news”?

“She and Brad have talked at length,” says a so-called “confidante” of the couple. “There’s no doubt in anyone’s mind that she’ll have another child.”

In other words, OK! is speculating that Jolie and Pitt might add to their family in the next 12 months.

That’s a far cry from the days (more than two years ago) when the tabloid insisted that Jolie was adopting a baby from Syria without Pitt.

Now, though, OK! is sure that she plans to give birth herself “despite her previous high-risk pregnancies.”

As “evidence” of this development, the mag quotes recent interviews in which Pitt and Jolie both suggest that another child is always a possibility.

But that’s neither shocking nor news - Pitt and Jolie have repeatedly indicated that they may add to their brood.

That said, sources close to the couple tell Gossip Cop there’s absolutely no timetable for adding to the family, nor does Jolie have specific plans to get pregnant in 2012.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

“Kim Kardashian is terrified of the private things Kris Humphries is willing to reveal,” shrieks OK! magazine.

According to the tabloid, Kardashian is convinced Humphries is set to drop bombshells about their 72-day marriage and that “no secret is safe.”

As with many similar stories, OK! spends more time describing how “frantic” Kardashian is about Humphries supposedly spilling secrets than on whether there even are juicy secrets to spill in the first place.

“During the period Kim and Kris were together, he undoubtedly heard her rant about her family members,” speculates the magazine.

As an example of the nasty stuff Kardashian might say about her loved ones, OK! mentions the “Kourtney & Kim Take New York” scene in which she refers to sister Khloe as “an evil, ugly little troll” in a text message.

Wait a minute.

The deep, terrifying secrets Humphries might reveal to the world are the type of sisterly insults Kardashian voluntarily puts on TV?

What else?

Well, OK!’s “insider” observes that Humphries “always used to make fun of her for being too vain. He’d joke about how much effort it takes to do her hair, how she wears false eyelashes, and how long it takes for her to push her boobs up so her cleavage is just right – all that kind of embarrassing personal stuff.”

Oh, come on.

The big revelation is going to be that Kim Kardashian is worried about her physical appearance?

That’s the best OK! can do?

In any case, as Gossip Cop has reported consistently, there is no truth to these alleged fears of Humphries (or his father) blowing the lid off the Kardashian family’s “secrets.”

It’s simply “not true,” a source close to the Kardashians tells Gossip Cop.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(OK!)

We’ll give OK! magazine credit for one thing: The tabloid knows how to milk a rumor.

“It was the canoodle felt round the world,” opens the tabloid’s cover story. “On Dec. 3 Twilight‘s Robert Pattinson left L.A.’s La Poubelle restaurant with actress Sarah Roemer, then squeezed into the backseat of a waiting car and stroked her hand – this with Rob’s on-and-off-screen love, Kristen Stewart, 5,000 miles away in England.”

Ah, yes, the infamous “canoodle”… that never happened.

Is OK! really using this debunked, non-event for the basis of a splashy story all about Pattinson begging a “confused and angry” Stewart not to leave him?

Oh, good grief.

“Rob’s one of the world’s biggest heartthrobs, and Kristen’s never been able to relax the whole time she’s been with him,” a so-called “insider” tells the tabloid. “This was, like, her worst fear realized.”

We’d love to hear more from the tabloid’s “insider.”

“Rob’s in total panic mode at the thought of losing Kristen,” adds the OK! source, explaining that he’s “virtually groveling on bent knee.”

To prove his love, Pattinson is supposedly designing a diamond ring for Stewart for Christmas.

Alas, according to OK!, “the Sarah flap is only the latest bump of a rocky period in Robstenland.”

Do tell!

Well, the fact that Stewart and Pattinson “have often been continents apart” means they’ve allegedly faced constant “temptation.”

For Pattinson, that’s included getting “uncomfortably close” with onetime co-star Emilie de Ravin, while Stewart’s supposedly lavished attention on colleagues like Garrett Hedlund and Taylor Lautner.

In fact, a Stewart “friend” suggests that “Rob may have played up the Sarah incident just to keep her jealous.”

Wait a minute.

So in OK!‘s twisted logic, Pattinson is both playing up AND playing down the alleged Roemer “canoodle”? He’s supposedly trying to make Stewart jealous AND at ease?

What’s more likely is that OK! magazine still has absolutely no clue what goes on between Stewart and Pattinson.

If it’s not Roemer and de Ravin and Hedlund and Lautner causing problems for the couple, it’s supposedly Sarah Gadon or maybe Chris Hemsworth.

Really, whoever’s closest at the moment.

Sources close to the couple tell us Stewart and Pattinson are as happy as ever, and laugh off OK!‘s latest attempt to be relevant.

Check out PHOTOS of Rob out in London!

See PICS of Kristen leaving her London apartment!

Like us on Facebook!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

(Warner Bros.)

It must be frustrating for OK! magazine to be in the dark all the time.

The tabloid has wrongly claimed (more than once) that Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart were engaged, fabricated a pregnancy for Stewart, and now alleges that there was a backstage blowup between Pattinson and Taylor Lautner after the Breaking Dawn cast appeared on “The Ellen DeGeneres Show” last month.

RELATED – EXCLUSIVE Details from ‘Breaking Dawn’ Cast Appearance on ‘Ellen’

According to OK!, Pattinson’s “temper flared after Taylor and Kristen became too chummy” during their interview.

Once the cameras stopped rolling, Pattinson allegedly “hit the roof,” says a so-called “insider,” who claims the actor told Stewart and Lautner that “their behavior made him look stupid.”

This “insider” explains, “He’s the clear fan favorite, but Rob has always felt threatened by Taylor. So seeing him and Kristen fawning all over each other was a trigger. He thought it was excessive, insensitive and that Kristen was enjoying making him jealous.”

Pattinson then supposedly told Lautner “to back off Kristen and find his own girlfriend.”

We kind of hoped that with the Twilight series winding down, so would these tired old rumors about jealousy among its biggest three stars.

Gossip Cop was the first outlet to share exclusive details from that “Ellen” taping, and our insiders – who actually have a clue – laughed off the OK! report.

We’re told Pattinson and Lautner could not have been friendlier to each other behind the scenes, and that there was no fighting whatsoever among the pair and Stewart.

Check out PHOTOS of Rob running errands in London!

See PICS of Taylor at the Breaking Dawn L.A. premiere!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

“Britney’s Engaged,” reads the headline of an OK! story that claims Britney Spears and Jason Trawick are now engaged.

According to the tabloid, the couple is even “planning a tropical wedding this spring” in either Maui or Costa Rica.

And the mag quotes a so-called “confidante” noting, “They’ve been engaged since this summer.”

Of course, if the tab’s source was really a “confidante,” then why doesn’t OK! know one single detail about the supposed engagement — such as when in the summer they got engaged, how Trawick popped the question, or even where he asked Spears to marry him.

That’s because Spears, who’s seriously dating Trawick and quite likely will tie the knot with him, is NOT engaged.

A rep for the singer tells Gossip Cop, OK! is “wrong.”

Check out PHOTOS of Britney & Jason hanging poolside in Brazil!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(OK!)

Of all the shameful things tabloids write – and it’s a long list – maybe nothing is as bad as fabricating danger to babies and children.

That’s exactly what OK! does this week.

The magazine’s cover story is all about Jessica Simpson‘s alleged “baby crisis,” including her “doctor’s shocking warning.”

According to OK!, “medical fears and emotional turmoil are spoiling what should be the happiest time” of Simpson’s life.

Wow, so what’s supposedly wrong?

The tab quotes a “friend” as saying Simpson has been “dizzy and nauseous” during her pregnancy, while an OK! “insider” contends, “She was totally unprepared for how hard it would be on her body.”

So… she has morning sickness?

What about the “crisis” that supposedly “could threaten her health – and her child”?

Well, the magazine claims Simpson’s been eating junk food.

“Everything she eats is highly processed with chemicals and preservatives, white flour and sugar,” alleges the “insider,” who adds that Simpson’s sister, Ashlee, and her doctor have both advised her to eat more healthfully.

So… she has cravings?

The OK! article gets even more ridiculous from there, mentioning that “everything on [Simpson] is swollen,” and that she’s “also sleep-deprived.”

In other words, OK! describes the typical experience of pregnancy and sensationalizes it as a medical emergency “baby crisis.”

Because the tabloid has nothing, it then discusses the “emotional angst” coming from Simpson’s purported “bitter conflict” with beau Eric Johnson over a prenup.

“Jessica said she was starting to think they’d never work it out,” explains a “source.”

On the financial stuff, OK! was wrong two weeks ago, and the tab is still wrong.

A source close to Simpson again tells Gossip Cop that it’s “totally ridiculous.”

And the magazine’s trumped-up tales of Simpson eating her way through a dangerous pregnancy are as baseless as they are sensationalized.

A source tells us, “She hired a chef who has been making healthy meals for everyone.”

Check out PHOTOS of Jessica’s adorable baby bump!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

“Those close to Rob Pattinson and Kristen Stewart fear the couple’s offscreen romance may fizzle now that filming is finished” on Breaking Dawn, writes OK! magazine in a clueless bit of speculation about the stars’ future together.

The tabloid’s headline – “Will Their Love Survive Twilight?” – is particularly ridiculous given that just two weeks ago the same publication claimed Pattinson and Stewart were set to marry.

Now, because there is no engagement news, OK! is following the tabloid pattern of swinging toward the opposite extreme, without bothering to detour into reality.

Stewart and Pattinson have “pressed the proverbial mute button on any wedding bells,” claims the magazine, badly mixing metaphors as it tries to cover its own poor reporting from earlier this month.

OK! also interprets the lack of “baby news” – also wrongly predicted by the tabloid – as proof that something’s amiss in the relationship.

A “source” for the mag also cites “the jealousy and insecurity that comes up when they’re on separate film sets” as a reason for concern.

Plus, Stewart will have to (gasp!) promote Snow White and the Huntsman “with her sexy co-star Chris Hemsworth, whom she’s clearly fond of.”

More than anything, argues OK!, the end of the Twilight Saga is what spells doom for Stewart and Pattinson.

“It can’t be denied that playing these fairy-tale lovers impacted them,” an “insider” tells the magazine. “They were both very connected to their characters’ larger-than-life passion and it really fueled the romance off-screen. That passion and obsessive quality between them has pretty much died.”

Sadly, OK!‘s “passion” for sensationalism has always burned hotter than its attention to facts, logic or consistency.

Stewart and Pattinson have repeatedly been apart for stretches during their relationship, and they’ve been fine despite hundreds of tab articles claiming that their temporary geographic separation meant they were doomed.

Gossip Cop is told once again that Stewart and Pattinson are perfectly happy, as they’ve been in the past, regardless of the Twilight timetable.

Check out PHOTOS of Rob & Kristen at the Breaking Dawn premiere in London!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

Carrie Underwood and husband Mike Fisher are “actively trying to get pregnant,” writes HollywoodLife, regurgitating a story from OK! magazine titled “Carrie’s Baby Joy!”

The site quotes a supposed “insider” as saying, “She may already be expecting. She’s had that happy glow about her for weeks.”

Aside from the tell-tale glow, “the biggest sign for everyone is the fact that she’s stopped drinking,” says the alleged source, noting, “Carrie usually loves having a glass of champagne once in a while, but lately she’s been skipping it.”

And Underwood supposedly “didn’t even have one sip after hosting the CMA Awards, which was really out of character,” explains the “insider.”

“Most of their close friends are expecting an announcement very soon,” says the source, and “She and Mike are very, very excited!”

And HollywoodLife is very, very clueless!

The blog, which every single week picks up tabloid rumors without fact checking, is wrong as usual.

A rep for Underwood tells Gossip Cop, “Carrie is not pregnant.”

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

Sandra Bullock is back in the pages of OK! magazine, which usually means the tabloid is lamely trying to link her romantically to Ryan Reynolds.

This time, the tab is going a step further.

Now, OK! is convinced Bullock got herself a “new face” as a response to Reynolds dating the much younger Blake Lively.

According to the mag, the 47-year-old Bullock “sported lips that looked noticeably poutier and fresh-looking skin” at JFK airport in New York recently.

“It looks like she got a little bit of help with her lips and her smile lines,” explains a so-called “friend.”

A different “source” adds that Bullock “appears to have had a forehead lift a few years ago and now undergoes a regular regimen of injectables,” including Botox for her eyes and Radiesse for the folds around her mouth.

“Losing Ryan to Blake has been a big blow to her ego and she is definitely panicking,” the “friend” tells OK!

Uh-huh.

Two things.

First of all, and hopefully for the last time, BULLOCK AND REYNOLDS DID NOT DATE.

The idea that she freaked out about Lively and Reynolds is patently untrue, because rumors about her and Reynolds were 100% inaccurate.

Second, Bullock has not had the cosmetic work OK! insists she has.

The report is “completely false,” a rep for the actress tells Gossip Cop, adding, ”She has done nothing to her lips nor her face. Her lips are exactly the same as they have always been.”

Check out PHOTOS of Sandra at a gala in L.A.!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

Those who are looking forward to watching Kim Kardashian‘s marriage unravel on the new season of “Kourtney & Kim Take New York” may be out of luck, according to OK! magazine, which claims Kris Humphries will be entirely edited out of the series.

A so-called “insider” for the tabloid says, “Episodes of ‘Kourtney & Kim Take New York’ are being re-editied in the wake of the couple’s split,” noting, “Kris will be written out of the show.”

Explains the magazine’s alleged “source,” “They [E!] will wrap this divorce up with a neat little bow in an episode and then move on.”

Wow, that’s going to be a pretty big undertaking for producers, considering Humphries lived in the hotel suite with Kim, Kourtney and Scott, and is likely in the majority of the show’s scenes.

What are they going to be left with, clips of Mason sucking his thumb?

Fortunately, the world need not worry about missing Kardashian’s relationship implode on national television.

A network source tells Gossip Cop the tab’s tale is “absolutely false,” adding, “Kris Humphries will be on the upcoming season.”

OK!‘s stories, on the other hand, could use a bit of editing.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(OK!)

“Jessica Simpson Pregnant & Betrayed” reads the cover of OK! magazine, which claims Eric Johnson is refusing to marry her unless she throws out their prenuptial agreement.

The mag says Johnson “had agreed to a prenuptial agreement,” but is now “backing out and insisting on an equal share of her fortune.”

According to a so-called “source” for the tab, “Eric knows how important it was to her to be married before the baby was born. She wanted to rush to wedding so that her child wouldn’t be born out of wedlock, and she wouldn’t walk down the aisle with a massive bump.”

“He’s basically using that as a bargaining chip,” alleges the purported insider.

Simpson is considering giving into Johnson’s supposed demands, says OK!, because she’s “a softy at heart” and “doesn’t want to mess up the relationship with Eric.”

Actually, it’s the reporting at OK! that’s soft.

While it’s true the couple drafted a prenup, as Gossip Cop has reported from day one, Simpson and Johnson never had a wedding date set, and so there’s no marriage ceremony from which Johnson is “backing out.”

We’re told both sides are — and have been — on the same page when it comes to the prenup.

A source close to Simpson further tells us, “There was never a wedding date officially set, and now they have decided to put the planning on hold until the baby is here.”

Check out PHOTOS of Jessica showing off her baby bump!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

For the 67th time, Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are allegedly getting “married.”

Pattinson is “ready to propose” to Stewart, claims the new OK! magazine, borrowing from very, very old OK! cover stories.

Back in September 2009, more than two years ago, the tabloid said the two stars were engaged.

It was totally made up.

The following spring, in May 2010, the tabloid announced that Pattinson had popped the question on the Eclipse set.

Not surprisingly, it was 100% bogus.

OK! showed just how little it knew about the couple by claiming (that same month) that Stewart was pregnant.

That, too, was a total fabrication.

In short, OK! has absolutely no clue when it comes to Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart.

But that doesn’t stop the tabloid from stirring things up (again) this week, speculating without a shred of evidence that the two Twilight stars are about to get hitched.

“They haven’t fully decided when, and Rob still needs to buy a ring and propose,” explains a so-called “insider” for OK!, adding that the couple could elope.

We also learn from the piece that Stewart’s (not serious) accident on the set of Snow White and the Huntsman supposedly left Pattinson “so scared it put marriage in the front of his mind.”

This is beyond pathetic.

For years now, OK! has alternated tales of Stewart-Pattinson engagements with stories about alleged threats to their relationship, all because the tabloid needs extremes to thrive.

We’re told the couple is as happy as ever – and that there’s been no change to their status.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

According to OK! magazine, Sandra Bullock and Keanu Reeves had an “intimate rendezvous” at Craig’s restaurant in West Hollywood on October 26.

“They were taken into a private room at the back of the restaurant,” an “observer” tells the tabloid. “They were chatting the whole night and looked really close. Keanu was making her laugh.”

Oh, by the way, there were other friends at this dinner – but that doesn’t really spice up the story, so OK! downplays it.

Ever since they co-starred in Speed, there have been “rumors” that Bullock and Reeves were more than just friends, “but it’s never evolved into a public relationship,” explains OK!

That’s because they do not have a romantic relationship.

An “insider” for OK! is puzzled: “It’s weird that they have never been an official couple. They have always been attracted to each other.”

They’ve never been “official” because there’s never been anything unofficial. They are friends. Period.

But the tabloid sees their “intimate” (with other dinner guests) rendezvous as a sign that things may be heating up between Reeves and Bullock after her divorce from Jesse James and what OK! calls the “cooling” of her relationship with Ryan Reynolds.

First of all, there was no relationship with Reynolds, either, despite the magazine’s repeated, frantic and wrong cover stories to the contrary.

More importantly: There’s absolutely nothing newsy about the reported dinner that included Bullock and Reeves.

“They’ve been friends for years,” a source close to Bullock tells Gossip Cop, adding that there’s still nothing romantic about their relationship.

Check out PHOTOS of Sandra looking gorgeous at a gala in L.A.!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

“Jessica’s Anxiety: Twins!” reads the headline of the latest OK! story about Jessica Simpson, who recently announced she’s pregnant.

According to the tabloid, Simpson is “ridden with angst” and “concerned” because she “might be carrying twins — at least.”

The mag goes on to say Simpson has begun to “question whether or not she’ll be a good mom… have postpartum depression… get her body back,” and that was when she thought she was having just one baby.

Now with supposedly two babies, she’s “totally freaking out,” reports OK!, adding that when the “doctor said she might be having twins, she had to rethink everything.”

Maybe OK! should “rethink” how it fact checks.

Simpson is not “ridden with angst,” “concerned,” or “freaking out” about having twins because she is NOT carrying two babies.

A source close to Simpson confirms to Gossip Cop she’s not expecting twins.

Check out PHOTOS of a glowing Jessica in Beverly Hills!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

Tabloids love nothing more than sex allegations and drastic weight swings – so why not print a story that combines the two?

OK! magazine wants to keep milking the reports of an alleged Ashton Kutcher-Sara Leal hotel tryst, and so, like other tabloids in recent weeks, it’s going after Demi Moore with speculation that she’s coming apart at the seams.

Specifically, OK! claims Moore is “literally starving” herself for attention.

The actress is said to be “subsisting almost entirely on cigarettes and energy drinks” in a desperate bid for sympathy, purports the magazine.

“Demi hasn’t sat down and had an actual meal since this whole thing started,” explains a so-called “insider” for the tab, which pegs Moore’s weight at 90 pounds.

Another OK! source insists, “Demi gets morbid comfort from people feeling sorry for her. She’ll take whatever attention she can get right now – even pity.”

Gossip Cop would actually describe the magazine’s obsession with Moore’s weight as “morbid.”

She’s been criss-crossing the country for work and dealing with the media firestorm around her marriage.

But Moore is absolutely NOT starving herself on purpose.

A source close to the actress slams the premise and says it’s “not true” that Moore is looking for publicity stunts to increase the current media glare, let alone endangering herself by “deliberately losing weight.”

This OK! story is definitely not OK.

Check out a gallery of Demi & Ashton’s most intimate Twitter PHOTOS!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(OK!)

The unintentionally hilarious new OK! cover laments the end of America’s Greatest Fictional Couple.

According to the magazine, Ryan Reynolds has “dumped” Sandra Bullock for Blake Lively, ending “the romantic karma comeback story of the year.”

A so-called “source” claims, “Sandra is crushed. She’s doing her absolute best to hold her head high and act as if she’s not bothered, but the truth is, she’s very hurt.

OK! wonders whether the supposed Bullock-Reynolds relationship “was too good to be true” after his “steamy Boston weekend” with Green Lantern co-star Lively, and the tabloid describes Reynolds allegedly choosing Lively as “another soul-crushing blow” to Bullock.

Well, it was certainly too imaginary to be true!

We know it might crush OK!‘s soul, but, as Gossip Cop has reported ever since silly rumors first surfaced, Bullock and Reynolds never dated.

They. Did. Not. Date.

Period.

Of course, now that Lively is newly single (having just split with Leonardo DiCaprio), she and Reynolds have been the rumor du jour, meaning OK! can use that angle to make Bullock seem like a pathetic sad sack.

Here’s what’s true:

Bullock and Reynolds are former co-stars and friends.

They were never a couple.

A source close to Bullock tells Gossip Cop “it’s all lies.”

Once again, OK! is anything but okay.

Check out a PHOTO GALLERY of Ryan’s many rumored (and real) lady loves!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

OK! claims that Christina Aguilera demands preferential treatment whenever she’s on the road.

According to the tab, the singer never gets caught in traffic jams as she travels in style.

The mag notes that regardless of whether Aguilera is in the U.S. or abroad, she will “make like a visiting head of state and insist on a police escort.”

Interestingly, even though OK! makes it seem like an every day occurrence, the tabloid doesn’t list one single example of Aguilera zipping through streets with sirens blaring and lights flashing.

That’s because the story is “100 percent false,” an Aguilera confidante assures Gossip Cop.

When it comes to stories with false reporting about cops and celebs, OK! should have known they’d get busted.

Check out PHOTOS of Christina performing at the Michael Jackson tribute concert!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

Last week, In Touch ridiculously claimed that Britney Spears switched hotels in Budapest because she was refused a second helping of food. Now OK! magazine reports the singer has “insisted” that a “stripper pole be installed in her hotel rooms.”

According to the tab, Spears is so adamant about it that “when a top Dublin hotel denied her request, Brit had to move to the more accommodating Four Seasons, which installed the steel pole for her.”

But is the “I Wanna Go” singer really the high-maintenance diva the tabloids make her out to be?

Not at all.

A rep for Spears tells Gossip Cop the rumor is “absolutely not true.”

Check out PHOTOS of Britney performing in a sexy outfit!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

(GettyImages.com)

“Jennifer Lopez has no intention of being alone for long,” begins a piece in OK! magazine, which goes on to claim that “since her split from Marc Anthony, J.Lo’s been auditioning a slew of sexy guys to be her main man.”

So, which lucky guys are supposedly in the running?

According to the mag, it’s a tight race between Lopez’s Parker co-star Jason Statham, her What to Expect When You’re Expecting love interest Rodrigo Santoro and her recent dinner companion Bradley Cooper.

An alleged insider for the mag says, “Jason’s a real man’s man, which Jennifer finds totally refreshing. She’s also a sucker for his accent.”

But Lopez is also drawn to Santoro, notes OK!, which quotes another “pal” as saying, “She has been married for nearly a decade — part of her wants to be naughty.”

Adds the supposed friend, “He’s six years her junior, so it makes sense to have a hot, steamy fling with him.”

And last but not least we have Cooper, whose “mix of sexiness and all-out ambition has earned him the top suitor spot among J.Lo’s family.”

Umm… could this story be any more ridiculous?!

Not only is it an absurd idea that she’s “auditioning” boyfriends, but Lopez also has absolutely nothing going on with any of these men.

Statham is in a serious relationship with Rosie Huntington-Whitely, while she and Santoro are co-stars only.

And her dinner outing with Cooper was a one-time thing.

In any case, a rep for the singer tells Gossip Cop the entire story is “inaccurate.”

OK! should start auditioning some new reporters.

Check out PHOTOS of J.Lo performing in a sexy red ensemble!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries may be “headed for an annulment,” reports OK! magazine, which goes on to claim that the couple’s marriage is off to a rocky start.

According to the mag, Humphries is having a tough time being in the limelight, and quotes Kardashian’s pal Jonathan Cheban as saying that the sudden fame is “a lot for a guy from Minnesota.”

Also, Humphries “says what he thinks,” which can “sometimes cause friction” between him and the Kardashian family, says the tab.

Scandalous!

And that’s not all.

A Kardashian “confidante” reveals the newlyweds “have fought” and that “Kris still can’t get over how long she takes to get her hair and makeup done and makes quips.”

Umm… what couple hasn’t had that fight before?

Regardless, a source close to Kardashian assures Gossip Cop the couple is “happy” and “doing just fine.”

Check out PHOTOS of Kim visiting the Children’s Museum in New York!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(OK!)

According to many clueless outlets, Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds have embarked on one of Hollywood’s most stirring romances, with one rumor even claiming Reynolds planned to “adopt” Bullock’s baby.

This week, OK! magazine ratchets up the nonsense another notch.

The tabloid says Bullock and Reynolds intend to have a kid together.

“Sandy would love nothing more than to give Louis a brother or sister,” reveals a so-called OK! “source.” “And Ryan could be her ticket to having a child of her own!”

Unfortunately, there is absolutely nothing in the piece itself to justify the absurd cover line about the two stars having a kid together.

There’s talk about how much Bullock loves her adopted son, Louis, and discussion of Reynolds’ own inclination to have children one day.

Apparently, that’s all it takes for OK! to connect the dots, even though, as Gossip Cop has reported repeatedly, Bullock and Reynolds are not even dating.

Ah, but a Bullock “friend” tells the magazine that it really is just that easy!

“Out of the blue, here comes this guy who she’s known for 10 years and loves dearly already and he just answers all of her prayers,” explains the supposed insider.

Actually, it’s this entire story that’s “out of the blue,” and completely untrue.

Sources close to both Bullock and Reynolds assure Gossip Cop that there is no romantic relationship, let alone any imminent “baby bliss.”

Check out PHOTOS of Ryan riding his motorcycle to Sandra’s house!

See PHOTOS of Sandra looking super happy in L.A.!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages)

“Eva’s Ready to Wed,” reads the headline of a piece in OK! about Eva Longoria and her boyfriend Eduardo Cruz.

After the tab recounts what the difficult year it has been for Longoria, who went through a divorce with Tony Parker, and whose show “Desperate Housewives” is ending next season, OK! writes, “Friends feel the pair is ready to wed, and this time Eva will have her fairy-tale ending.”

While sources close to Longoria acknowledge that Penelope Cruz‘s brother truly adores the actress, her rep tells Gossip Cop the claim that she’s “ready to wed” is simply “not true.”

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

When Angelina Jolie visits Brad Pitt on location, the tabloids have two options.

First, they could declare that her arrival means she’s jealous and checking up on him.

Or, they can use the visit itself as the source for some supposed argument, so that her eventual departure seems really dramatic and angry.

The idea that Jolie and Pitt simply like to spend time together is too difficult for scandal-minded rumor mongers to grasp.

This week, OK! magazine claims the couple was tense during son Maddox‘s recent 10th birthday party, which the family celebrated by seeing Wicked in London, where Pitt is currently filming World War Z.

The alleged chill in the air was due to what OK! says is an ongoing fight stemming from Pitt’s reluctance to hang out with Jolie.

According to an “insider,” Jolie “is seething!”

“When she rearranged her schedule and flew to London to be with Brad, she imagined they’d be having romantic dinners and hanging out together on the set, and he’s basically blowing her off,” reports the tab’s source.

Yeah, instead they’re stuck… celebrating their child’s birthday together?

OK! says Jolie has “reached her limit with her partner of six years.

“Angie’s ready to strike back hard,” claims the “insider.” “She’s going to walk out and take the kids back to their French estate.”

We’re not sure if “striking back hard” is code for particularly rough sex, but we can see exactly where this is going.

Whenever Jolie and Pitt part ways, OK! and other magazines will insist that she’s storming out in anger, rather than, well, leaving as scheduled.

A source close to the couple tells Gossip Cop they’re having a great time together, as always, and points out that OK! has been especially misguided with regard to Pitt’s time in England.

This week is no different.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(OK!)

“Rihanna and Joe Jonas are getting frisky,” reports British OK!, claiming the two pop stars have been “sending raunchy text messages to each other.”

The mag says Jonas and the “S&M” singer “met when Joe was recording a song with Chris Brown,” and now Rihanna has “vowed to friends to give him the ‘wildest ride’ of his life.”

Wait a minute.

Jonas and Brown only began collaborating in April 2011, and Rihanna and Brown have not hung out since he brutally beat her in 2009.

The exes reconnected on Twitter in May, but that’s the extent of their current relationship. Therefore, it’s impossible that she would have met Jonas through Brown.

In any case, a source close to Jonas says there’s “no truth” to the Rihanna sexting story.

Check out PHOTOS of Rihanna showing off her sexy beach bod in Barbados!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!