Their kids, it seems, are totally out of control, and allegedly “it’s chaos” behind the doors of their multimillion-dollar homes.

A source for the tabloid says every day starts with the children demanding different breakfasts, usually treats “like cupcakes and pastries.”

Sufficiently sugared, their behavior then supposedly descends… into madness.

“Pax is the ringleader,” explains the so-called “insider,” who, we’re left to assume, is an anthropologist Star hired to watch the Jolie-Pitts in their natural habitat.

The source claims seven-year-old Pax “can be aggressive, and he and Maddox can get physical with each other. They’re a real handful.”

In addition to constant “roughhousing,” the kids are supposedly allowed to paint and draw on the walls, never facing consequences for their messy behavior.

“Brad and Angie have 25 staff members, but they hardly ever reprimand the kids for that or anything else,” reveals the Star source.

We’d be slightly more inclined to believe all of this if Star hadn’t proven itself wrong about Pitt and Jolie time and time and time and time and time again.

A source close to the family laughed off this latest Star fabrication, saying that while the six kids can be rambunctious (like other children their age), the idea that they’re bouncing off the walls and wreaking zoo-like havoc is preposterous.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

Angelina Jolie

Star magazine claimed last week that the couple is getting married because Maddox loves Shrek (it’s as stupid as it sounds), and now this week the longtime family fabulists at In Touch are alleging that 7-year-old Pax has become a bully.

According to the tab, a therapist has joined the jet-setting clan to help Pax “deal with his aggression.”

“He’s becoming something of a bully,” an “insider” reveals to In Touch. “He picks on [5-year-old] Shiloh, and even on his big brother, Maddox. He’s really having a tough time getting along with his siblings.”

The magazine mentions his difficult early childhood in Vietnam as a potential source of the alleged “aggression,” and also says “his chaos-filled current lifestyle is likely also a factor.”

To illustrate just how out of control Pax is, In Touch uses a few paparazzi photos of the youngster making faces and being rambunctious with his siblings.

“He’s having a difficult time with the constant schedule changes, and with the fact that people stare at him whenever he’s with his parents,” explains the “insider.”

Hmm.

In other words, a 7-year-old (who is constantly followed by photographers) has been spotted sticking out his tongue, arguing with his brothers and sisters, and otherwise acting exactly like every other 7-year-old in the history of 7-year-olds.

But because In Touch is so desperate to find cracks in the Brangelina brood, the magazine interprets Pax’s totally unremarkable behavior as an indication that Jolie and Pitt are losing control of their family.

As a family source tells Gossip Cop, Pax and his sibs occasionally act up, but in no way is he the wild “bully” In Touch makes him out to be.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are the subjects of tabloid rumors week after week, generally with the same theme – they and/or their kids are fighting.

And Gossip Cop keeps busy busting those false reports.

Well, despite the repetitious magazine malarky, Brangelina and their brood are perfectly happy together.

In fact, today the celebrity couple and their kids – Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, and twins Knox and Vivienne – hit the streets of New Orleans, where Pitt is shooting the thriller Cogan’s Trade.

The whole clan head out earlier to a favorite Pitt stop – Verti Marte Deli, where they picked up snacks.

Click here for PHOTOS of them out-and-about in the Big Easy.

Of course, we can guarantee the tabs will somehow or another find a way to spin trouble out of what was a family fun day.

Just wait.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Like us on Facebook!

According to the magazine, the star’s children Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, Knox and Vivienne are sick of moving around from city to city and “have a message for their mom: We’re not gonna take it anymore.”

Indeed, the kids have begun to “revolt” against their parents, supposedly banding together to halt a planned move to New Orleans, where dad Brad Pitt is set to shoot a film.

A so-called “insider” claims “Shiloh and Pax started throwing a tantrum” after Jolie returned from a recent trip to the grocery store because “neither one of them wants to leave their school and friends behind.”

Even Pitt is wary of Jolie’s plan to uproot their brood, allegedly believing it’s “for her own sake, not theirs.” In Touch‘s source is convinced that Jolie only wants to move the family to New Orleans because there is “temptation” there, and she wants “to keep an eye on Brad.”

“No doubt their house in New Orleans will be a tense one in the coming months,” concludes In Touch.

Actually, as has been the case for years now, the magazine depicts Pitt and Jolie’s household as “tense,” while the couple stubbornly continues to live happily. In Touch is now reduced to using a four-year-old’s (alleged) fit as reason to publish an entire story around the idea that the whole family is battling Jolie.

Something here is revolting… but it’s not the kids.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Check us out on Facebook!

(In Touch)

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie recently staged a “secret wedding,” claims In Touch, the same magazine that’s long insisted the couple’s relationship is going down the tubes.

How to explain the tab’s abrupt reversal?

Well, it’s downright easy – when little things like facts and reality aren’t allowed to mess up a good bait-and-switch cover story!

According to In Touch, Brangelina “whisked their six children off to a tropical paradise” – a resort in the Seychelles Islands – where they “exchanged vows” on November 23.

Wow, that’s incredible!

Ah, but lost in the cover’s breathless announcement about the couple’s alleged decision to “tie the knot” and their “intimate beach ceremony” is a tiny detail.

The wedding was all imaginary.

“It was a very private, pretend wedding mainly for the kids,” an In Touch “insider” reports.

Supposedly, Pitt and Jolie treated their children to faux nuptials, thereby honoring the kids’ wishes to see them marry. The so-called “fairy-tale wedding” was an elaborate trick. “The kids now think Mommy and Daddy are married,” explains the tabloid’s “insider.”

This was “pretend,” all right.

Except the “trick” wasn’t played on Pitt and Jolie’s kids. It was played on In Touch‘s readers.

Anyone scanning the cover would assume Brangelina shocked the world with a tropical wedding after years of saying they wouldn’t officially marry.

What actually happened, though, was a family vacation.

There was no ceremony. There was no “rehearsal for the real wedding,” which the “insider” guesses “will take place very soon, probably in Hungary.” There were no rings, no vows, and no nuptials, period.

Jolie and Pitt and their children just happen to be happy, which messes up everything In Touch has written about them week after week after week after week.

So the mag decided to do what it does best – slap another fairy tale on the cover.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Check us out on Facebook!

(In Touch)

This week, In Touch‘s hilariously unsuccessful campaign to split Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt drafts a new recruit: a former nanny who “tells all.”

The thrust of her tale? The couple lets their kids rule the household, which has turned into a chaotic wreck.

It is a place “rife with fighting, four-letter words, and sibling squabbles and injuries,” according to the magazine, whose “insider” claims the children run around “like monsters.”

What kinds of behavior are allegedly permitted?

Jolie reportedly allows all of the kids to “watch R-rated movies — and repeat the salty dialogue,” while also giving them access to “all the junk food they want.”

Her nine-year-old son Maddox has allegedly drank wine and drive a car around the family’s property in France, and the “source” says “There’s a lot of fighting among all of the kids, especially Maddox and Pax. They both have bad tempers.”

In Touch concludes its breathless description of Pitt and Jolie’s house of horrors by quoting their insider as saying the couple needs additional rules in place before their family life gets more “out of control.”

Actually, “out of control” is what In Touch has been for months, writing dozens and dozens of empty stories about Pitt and Jolie’s purported problems.

The mag has gone after the couple and their family from every angle, only to be disappointed by a lack of actual scandal.

The same holds true with this week’s nonsense, which In Touch gets from a friend of the unnamed nanny. Could this be any sketchier?

“None of this is true” a rep for Jolie tells Gossip Cop.

See PHOTOS of Brad Pitt visiting Angelina Jolie on the set of her new film

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Check us out on Facebook!

Visit GossipCop.com for the latest!

(GettyImages.com)

As Gossip Cop reported this week, Angelina Jolie and four of her children have gone to Budapest, Hungary, where Jolie will be filming her directorial debut.

And, because In Touch is obsessed with transforming Jolie’s every move into controversy, the magazine is depicting the travel as a major crisis.

“A Family Torn Apart,” declares a headline in the tab, which claims that the kids’ enrollment in school in Hungary has taken the couple’s desire for them to be “citizens of the world” way “too far.”

Pitt is “heartbroken,” according to a “friend” quoted by In Touch, because he misses his family and “wants to make sure that his kids are normal kids, just like he was.”

“This is very divisive for their family,” says a random “relationship expert” the magazine cites.

We wonder whether Jolie’s decision to stay with her kids while she shoots a movie is as “divisive” as her humanitarian interest in flood-ravaged Pakistan, which In Touch also managed to hold against her.

When Jolie is with her children, the tabloid says it’s just for show, or goes so far as to manipulate photographs to make it seem like she’s an inadequate mom. So if she’d gone to Budapest without them, In Touch would be calling her an absentee mother.

Once again, it’s a no-win situation for Jolie when it comes to the magazine that has desperately — and wrongly — yelled for months that she’s imperiling her family.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Check us out on Facebook!

Visit GossipCop.com for the latest!

(GettyImages.com)

It’s back to school for the Jolie-Pitt kids, which means naturally they’re… in Budapest.

While dad Brad Pitt is in Boston filming Moneyball, the brood is with Angelina Jolie in Hungary, where she’s directing her first feature-length film.

As Gossip Cop previously reported, the film is a love story about a Serbian man and a Bosnian who fall for each other during the Bosnian War.

So, will the kids have to learn Hungarian to do their homework?

Nem.

(That’s Hungarian for “no.”)

Maddox, Pax, Zahara and Shiloh will be in an English-speaking school.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Check us out on Facebook!

Visit GossipCop.com for the latest!

(GettyImages.com)

Apparently, In Touch is going to keep concocting rumors about Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt instead of backing off its futile, months-long campaign to prove the couple is in trouble.

So we’re going to keep calling the tab on its nonsense.

Jolie has again run afoul of the magazine by being too involved as a wife and mom. For instance, while watching Pitt and son Maddox race go-karts during his 9th birthday party, Jolie “looked like a devoted partner and loving mother.”

How… horrible?

Well, the problem, In Touch claims, is that it’s all a charade.

“Being overly polite, as well as showing devotion to her family, has become [Jolie's] goal,” allege the tab’s “insiders.” The nice behavior is explained as compensation for the guilt Jolie supposedly feels after the release of an unauthorized, unflattering biography.

According to the mag, Jolie is cynically “making it her mission to stay home with the kids and prove how great a parent and role model she can be.”

She’s even said to have suggested trips to visit Pitt’s family in Missouri, “something she’s always been against in the past.”

No, it’s actually something In Touch has wrongly insisted she’s “been against.”

At what point does In Touch stop recycling its own discredited theories as though they’re evidence of Brangelina drama? And when will the tabloid stop asking its readers to believe that if something (or someone) looks happy, it must be fake?

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Check us out on Facebook!

Visit GossipCop.com for the latest!

(In Touch)

This is just getting embarrassing for In Touch.

The magazine is desperate to prove that relentless coverage of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, questioning their relationship and predicting its demise, was anything other than empty nonsense.

So it just keeps digging a deeper and deeper hole.

This week it returns to an old angle, insisting that Jolie’s affection and attentiveness as a mother are all for show.

Back in April, In Touch manipulated a series of photographs to “prove” that the actress isn’t the hands-on mom she claims to be. Now comes an even more baffling article about Jolie “betraying her family” and her kids “turn[ing] against her.”

The mag tries to attack Jolie as a mother by saying she’s never around her kids… and always around her kids.

Confused?

Well, In Touch uses any instance of Jolie’s children spending time with a nanny or bodyguard as proof that she’s too busy to be an actual mom, leaving those duties to staff. For instance, sons Maddox and Pax were spotted having burgers and fries with a nanny at the Oakland hotel where the family is staying during Pitt’s filming for Moneyball.

But when Jolie makes time for her kids despite being busy, it’s allegedly just for publicity. When she describes their “happy home” or takes the children with her on foreign trips, says In Touch, it’s only to spin her family life for the press. “It seems that appearances are more important than reality,” chimes the tabloid.

Considering In Touch‘s miserable track record when it comes to “reality” and Jolie, we take the tab’s contradictory premise with a few truckloads of, um, Salt.

At a loss for content, the tab also trots out the baseless claim that Pitt was “blindsided” by stories of Jolie’s past in a new unauthorized biography, dropping their relationshp to a “low point.”

In Touch talks about “low points” so often, we’re starting to think the tab is confusing Brangelina with its own dreadful reporting.

Sources close to the couple assure Gossip Cop that there’s no more truth to the latest In Touch allegations than the previous dozen.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Check us out on Facebook!

Visit GossipCop.com for the latest!

(HollywoodLife.com)

“Aww! Brad & Angelina Took Their Brood Out For A Valentine’s Day Dinner!” gushes the headline of a HollywoodLife story that goes on to report, “Angelina Jolie took a trip down memory lane Feb. 14 as she and Brad Pitt took Maddox, 9, Pax, 6, and Zahara, 5, to Benihana for a special Valentine’s Day dinner.”

They really spent “Valentine’s Day” at Benihana’s in L.A.?!

Wrong.

While it’s true the couple and their kids – minus Shiloh, Vivienne and Knox – had a dinner at Benihana’s, it was TWO full days before Valentine’s Day, not “Feb. 14,” as inaccurately reported by HollywoodLife.

What’s scary, though, is HollywoodLife’s Perez-like style of cutting and pasting info, and then adding an incorrect twist to it.

HollywoodLife took its story from Life & Style, which noted Brangelina “took their three eldest children for a Valentine’s Day eve dinner at the Benihana restaurant.”

Not Valentine’s Day. Not “Feb. 14,” as stated by HollywoodLife, but rather Valentine’s “eve.”

Life & Style and HollywoodLife are a little like the blind leading the blind, because it wasn’t Valentine’s Day “eve” either. It was two days before Valentine’s Day, meaning a regular Friday night.

For the record, Pitt, Jolie, and their kids spent Valentine’s Day at home.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for the MOST  accurate celebrity news!

(GettyImages.com)

Amid persistent (wrong) rumors that their relationship is in trouble and nearing an end, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie attended last night’s Super Bowl in Miami… together and very happily.

With son Maddox decked out in New Orleans Saints gear, Pitt and Jolie smiled, laughed, hugged, greeted fans, and cheered as the team won its first NFL championship, beating the Indianapolis Colts 31-17.

Pitt and Jolie own a home in New Orleans.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for the best in accurate celebrity news!

(GettyImages.com)

Yesterday, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie whisked their kids  — minus  17-month-old twins Knox and Vivienne — into a supercalifragilisticexpialidocious matinee of “Mary Poppins” on Broadway.

The couple, along with Maddox, Pax, Zahara, and Shiloh, quickly jumped out of a vehicle to avoid New York’s freezing temperatures and rushed into the theater.

The Pitt-Jolie brood have been in New York for the past two weeks while the actress finishes production of her film, “Salt.”

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for the latest!

Visit GossipCop.com for the best in ACCURATE celebrity & entertainment news!

(GettyImages.com)

Enter Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie into the “Damned if you do, damned if you don’t” file.

Jolie, who’s the subject this week of cover stories from OK!, Star, Us Weekly, Life & Style, and the National Enquirer, attended L.A.’s Museum of Contemporary Art’s 30^th anniversary exhibition with Pitt two nights ago, and not surprisingly, their every gesture and grimace were (over)analyzed.

The Daily Mirror, for instance, ran the headline, “Sombre Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie look distant on a rare night out as they join A-listers at art party.”

“Somber?” (as we prefer to spell it) Really?

The paper editorialized, “Far from their usual red carpet public displays of affection we are used to, the couple simply walked a short distance apart as they were shown the gallery’s collection on a private tour,” which included pieces by Mark Rothko, Roy Lichtenstein and Jackson Pollock.

So now if they don’t hold hands, which they actually did at certain points that evening, or kiss for the cameras inside a “sombre” museum, it’s a sign of trouble?

Of course, the naysayers will take their public outing to claim it’s for just for show amidst a mass of negative publicity – or blame the parents of six for not spending time with their children. The Daily Mirror even noted how they were out “without their six children Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, Vivienne and Knox” – because everyone knows how much kids LOVE museums.

Anyway, in order to illustrate how they “look distant,” the tab and other media outlets ran photos of the couple looking serious as they checked out the artwork, standing about 10-inches apart. Yeah, real distant.

And that’s precisely why Gossip Cop has used another photo from that evening that paints an entirely different – and more accurate – story.

You should still brace yourselves, because there will be plenty more insinuations and innuendos about Brangelina in two weeks when an unauthorized biography hits bookstores.

For the latest in accurate celebrity reporting, follow @GossipCop on Twitter, and check GossipCop.com for updates!