(NYDailyNews.com)

“He’s People‘s Sexiest Man Alive for 2010. She’s GQ‘s Babe of the Year. But are Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson still hot for each other?” asks the New York Daily News’ “Gatecrasher” column.

The column claims that a source close to Johansson says the couple has relationship “troubles,” which may be “the reason the abs-solutely fabulous Reynolds did not make a cameo on ‘Saturday Night Live’ when his Lamborghini-curved wife hosted the show last weekend.”

To further make its point, the Daily News notes that “in October 2009, Johansson put in a surprise ‘SNL’ appearance when Reynolds was the show’s guest host.”

The paper then says it heard “producers were interested in having the upcoming ‘Green Lantern’ star make a similar cameo,” but he declined.

OK, so even if he didn’t want to do a cameo on “SNL,” how does that translate to “troubles” in one’s marriage?

More importantly, sources tell Gossip Cop there was never even a mention at “SNL” of Reynolds doing a cameo.

Meanwhile, a rep for Johansson assures Gossip Cop the attractive couple is “not having any marital issues,” and a spokesperson for Reynolds similarly says the Daily News’ premise is “not true.”

Check out PHOTOS of Scarlett’s sexiest looks

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Check us out on Facebook!

(GettyImages.com)

The New York Daily News’ “Gatecrasher” crashed again in a piece that said on Lindsay Lohan’s “to-do list is Gucci model Adam Senn.”

According to a Daily News “source,” Lohan and Senn “really hit it off” when the actress was last in New York.

That same “source” claims, “He’s genuinely interested in her, and it seems pretty mutual,” adding “Adam even said he was looking forward to when she got back from India,” where she’s working on a BBC documentary on poverty in that country.

The item goes on to then detail how she’s “recently canoodled with the likes of Jason Segel, Kevin Connolly, and a very married Cash Warren.”

Here’s what’s wrong, paragraph by paragraph:

1. Senn is not on Lohan’s “to-do” list. And we know this because she told Gossip Cop from India, “it’s a story from over three years ago.”

2. They didn’t hit it off the last time she was in New York, because she didn’t see him – she spent the vast majority of her time at her mom’s place.

3. Senn may be looking forward to seeing her, but Lohan is not interested in him.

4. Though the article said she “canoodled” with Jason Segel, Kevin Connolly, and Cash Warren, the reality is she didn’t hook up with ANY of them.

Lohan told Gossip Cop the article is “lame BS.”

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter and check GossipCop.com for the latest in ACCURATE celebrity reporting!

(NYDailyNews.com)

The New York Daily News’ “Gatecrasher” column has crashed again with its piece, “Rihanna finds romance with ’90210′ star Tristan Wilds.”

The column reports, “Spies tell us that the singer is dating actor Tristan Wilds. The ‘90210’ star was an unexpected guest at a party RiRi held over the weekend at her L.A. home, where she was saying goodbye to pals before taking off for a set of London gigs.”

Wait, if she’s dating Wilds, why would he be “an unexpected guest?”

Logic be damned, Gatecrasher goes on to say that, according to a guest, everyone at the party “quickly realized they weren’t meeting for the first time, because they were openly affectionate for everyone to see.”

Oh, it’s on because it was obvious that “they weren’t meeting for the first time?”

Anyway, the column adds that its source says Rihanna and Wilds “were introduced by a music producer who has worked with both of them,” and that “They hit it off the moment they laid eyes on each other.” That same “guest” says, “From the moment he walked into her party, Rihanna lit up.”

Maybe – and we’re just going to throw this out there – Rihanna was happy to see Wilds because… they’re friends?

But rather than basing a romance tale on someone’s observation of how Rihanna reacted when an “unexpected guest” showed up to her party, Gossip Cop actually contacted two people who are close to her. Both said it wasn’t true. One of them emphatically stated, “definitely not.”

Not “unexpected.”

For the most accurate celebrity reporting, follow @GossipCop on Twitter, and check GossipCop.com for updates!

(NYDailyNews.com)

The boobs at the family-friendly New York Daily News published a photo online today of Lady Gaga in which her right breast is clearly exposed.

The article in the Gatecrasher column that accompanied the photo had something to do with Lady Gaga not needing Kanye West to sell tickets, and how her solo “Monster Ball’ tour is doing well. Or something like that. Frankly, most of our attention was diverted by the titillating error the paper made posting this picture. So much so that we didn’t even notice — until a reader pointed it out — that the Daily News also misspelled Kanye’s name wrong in its headline, “Lady Gaga doesn’t need Kayne to pack the house.”

We’re sure the Daily News regrets its mistake — and has picked up a slew of male readers.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for the latest in accurate and nipple-free reporting, and check GossipCop.com for updates!

(GettyImages.com)

Call Gossip Cop a softie, but we like to share sweet stories that we hear about celebrities. This one is about hip-swiveling Shakira.

On Monday night when the singing star was leaving a party in New York, where she celebrated her latest Rolling Stone cover and the release of her album, “She Wolf,” she breezed past the paparazzi standing outside and instead noticed, as she was getting into her car, an 11-year-old girl who had been patiently waiting for her for two hours. 

“She turned around and went over to the little girl and gave her a big hug,” an eyewitness told Page Six, adding “The girl started tearing up. It was very cute.”

Shakira seems to have a fondness of late for kids. She also told the New York Daily News at that party, “I’d love to have kids,” though she’s not necessarily ready to get married.

 For the most accurate celebrity reporting, visit GossipCop.com and follow us on Twitter – @GossipCop.

(GettyImages.com)

“’Twilight’ duo, Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart, stay apart to squash romance rumors,” was the headline of a piece in the New York Daily News’ Gatecrasher column.

The article then went on to say, that in order to quiet talk of them being a couple, Pattinson and Stewart “are keeping a safe distance while promoting their ‘Twilight’ sequel, ‘New Moon.’”

The paper even has an alleged “insider” say, “They’ve requested to do press separately for the movie… to avoid being seen together. Any time they’re photographed in the same place, the rumor mill just starts all over again.”

Picking up on that story, Perez “too-busy-blocking-Gossip-Cop-on-Twitter-to-fact-check” Hilton writes Pattinson and Stewart “won’t be in the same city again until they come to the Big Apple for back-to-back appearances on the ‘Today Show’ on Nov. 18.”

A couple of things: One, neither Hilton nor anyone else would know about the “Today Show” bookings had it not been for Gossip Cop.

Two, is he freakin’ serious?! “They won’t be in the same city again until… November 18”? Uh, the premiere in Los Angeles is on November 16 — two days before — and they’re BOTH going.

But why stop there?

The Gatecrasher column and “Cop Blocker” Hilton must have simply forgotten that Pattinson and Stewart will be together on November 6 when they tape “Jimmy Kimmel Live.”

And that’s right, they’ll also be together in Paris for a promotional appearance on November 10.

And oh yeah, the following day they’ll be together for an event in London.

So other than those three dates…

No wait, Pattinson and Stewart will be together on November 12 in Madrid.

Nor should you forget about their event together in Munich on November 14.

Just to recap then… so unless you count their appearances together in Los Angeles, Paris, London, Madrid, Munich and then again in Los Angles – that’s correct, they “They won’t be in the same city again until… November 18.”

Maybe Gatecrasher and “Cop Blocker” should consider a profession where accuracy isn’t so important.

For dish served the right way, be sure to visit GossipCop.com and follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

(WireImage.com)

The New York Daily News has tried to pit Charlie Sheen’s ex-wife Denise Richards against his current wife Brooke Mueller. In an item today in the paper’s “Gatecrasher” column, it’s reported that Mueller “threw a fit” at an Emmy Awards gifting suite “when she was denied her request of a diamond-and-gold Hershey’s Kiss necklace – and offered silver instead.”

According to the paper, Mueller reportedly said, “I know Denise Richards was here earlier, and she has a diamond necklace.” After being told that it was true, says the paper, “Mueller sniped: ‘She’s going down!’”

How dramatic – and fictional.

Yes, it’s true that both women went to the same gifting suite. In fact, Mueller and Richards, who now have an amicable relationship, ran into each other and exchanged hugs and kisses. A woman who was there at the time told Gossip Cop that Mueller even complimented Richards: “I love your boots.”

That same onlooker says Mueller was told by the jewelry people that they didn’t have anymore diamond necklaces to give away then, but an employee offered, “We’d love to send you one.”

But what about Mueller “throwing “a fit?” The eyewitness tells Gossip Cop there was “no yelling” or any type of phrase uttered like “She’s going down!”

Sorry Charlie (and Brooke and Denise).

(GettyImages.com)

Boy did the New York Daily News’ “Gatecrasher” column crash and burn on a story about Kirsten Dunst, well, crashing.

According to the paper, “Kirsten Dunst crashed a luncheon at NYC’s Oak Room [last week] because she wanted to score a job.” It goes on to claim that during a lunch in honor of director Jane Campion, “Dunst barged in because she wants a role in the director’s upcoming ‘Runaway.’”

Other equally unreliable reports picked up the story and added, for instance, that Dunst did “an impromptu audition.”

All of it is not true.

As a matter of fact, Campion has been interested in meeting with Dunst for some time to discuss a role, but their schedules never worked out. And it just happened that both of them were in New York that day so Campion asked Dunst “if she wouldn’t mind meeting her at the Plaza,” her rep told Gossip Cop.

Repeat: Campion asked Dunst to meet her at the Plaza. The “Spider-Man” star did not crash the luncheon.

Nor was there any audition of any kind by Dunst.

(GettyImages.com)

The New York Daily News’ Gatecrasher column once again crashed, this time in a piece on the “Battle of the Divas,” Mariah Carey and Whitney Houston.

The News devoted four paragraphs to reporting that Carey is releasing her upcoming album “Memories of an Imperfect Angel” on “Sept. 29, missing the Grammy cutoff date by just one day.” Why a day late? According to the News’ source, “Mariah’s been shafted so many times before that it’s like a big ‘Kiss my butt’ to the Grammy folks.”

Nice revenge tale . . . but the eligibility date for the Grammys was pushed up a month this year to August 31, and Carey, though an imperfect angel, wanted to work a little more to make her album a little closer to perfect.

The paper goes on to say that Whitney Houston’s album is “now set to hit shelves on Sept. 1.”

Close, but no cigar. That date is wrong, too. Houston’s release is on August 31, so that it can be in Grammy contention.

The piece also stated that Houston’s first single, ‘I Look to You,’ “received a lukewarm reception on pop radio.” Oops, the song was serviced to urban radio, and landed in the Top 10 airplay list.

What’s crazy is that it probably took Gossip Cop more time to write this piece than the News took to fact-check it.