comScore
  1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Busting bad dish!

Hot Topics Jennifer Lawrence Kim Kardashian Rihanna Robert Pattinson Beyonce Justin Bieber Kristen Stewart

CLAIM: Suri Cruise Has Own Credit Card, Only “Imaginary” Friends

Truth rating: 0

11:16 am, August 30th, 2012

(GettyImages.com)

Suri Cruise is the subject of another mean-spirited tabloid story this week, with the cover of Star promising to take readers inside the six-year-old’s so-called “bizarre” world.

The mag claims Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes’ daughter has “only nannies and bodyguards for friends,” and leads a “sheltered” life with no boundaries.

Star says that because of Suri’s alleged loneliness, the child has resorted to making up imaginary friends, a fantasy which her parents are supposedly happy to indulge.

RELATED – Suri Cruise’s “Lonely Life” Fabricated By Sad, Clueless Tabloid

According to a “source” for the tab, “Katie spent money on high-end furniture and had an interior designer decorate a room just for Suri’s imaginary friends, even going so far as to let Suri pick out the colors and toys for them.”

And that’s not all.

The so-called “friend” also claims that Suri has “her own credit card.”

“Suri loves credit cards,” explains the alleged pal, noting, “so Katie added Suri’s name to one of her cards and lets her use it to buy candy each week.”

Is that so?

Then how come Suri didn’t buy the “high-end furniture” for her supposed imaginary friends herself?

Let’s face it: Every single word of this story is entirely MADE UP.

Suri doesn’t even have nannies.

Aside from being the innocent subject of nasty tabloid stories like this one, Suri is a fairly regular six-year-old despite her celeb parents, spending her summer going to gymnastics classes, taking trips to the zoo and learning to ride her bike — just like other kids.

In any case, a source close to Holmes tells Gossip Cop it’s “disgusting” that Star puts children on its covers, and says the article is “all lies.”

A rep for Cruise adds that the story is completely “not true.”

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

You might like:


  • Tiny Tina

    Why can’t these vultures leave this poor child alone.

  • Sarah

    True this child does need to be left alone. I do not understand why she is constantly photographed. I hope she does have friends her own age. Does she go to school or is she privately taught?

  • Lori

    The media has been making up lies about this child since before she was even born. It’s so sad that they can publish whatever they want, and it’s up to people to sue to have it corrected after the fact. I don’t know what the answer is, but I wish that someone could figure out how to stop this madness.

  • Cherish

    For the love of all that is Holy, we are talking about a little baby, she hasn’t even reached the age of reason yet. Leave this child ALONE.

  • Luke66

    “A sheltered life with no boundaries” is an oxymoron.

  • vanese

    I can’t believe that a human being believes Star. This saddens me that they pick on a child. I just wish that the government and these organizations that are out there to protect children will do something. They protect animals, but they will not do anything about this child. They can destroy this child before she reaches 10 years old when children will begin to tell her what they read about her. If anything happens to this child, the tabloids should be blamed.

  • Think about it.

    How are your sources anymore believable than Star’s?? I completely agree that children should NOT be on the covers of tabloids and my heart goes out to Suri Cruise for all the nonsense that’s said about her, but I find this site beyond hypocritical. You claim to have a source “close to Katie” and so does Star, so why should you be believed? If you had a real source, they would have a name as would Star’s source. Lets face it: Your information is no better or more believable than Star’s – not without a named source. Frankly, I’m tired of your hypocricy and I have no doubt in my mind that your statements are as made up as the tabloids. It’s offensive that you would be so hypocritical. In addition, you’re exposing poor little Suri to scrutiny just like the tabloids, by calling attention to a story you truly cannot disprove. My point is this…..GossipCop is no better than Star or any other tabloid and you’re twice as hypocritical and just as guilty of exploiting a child.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=538007067 Maree Mulreany

    Maybe its time some new laws were bought in which prevent this money grabbing magazines to be forced to print only the truth.. I for one stopped buying magazines 16 years ago, true I will not pay for trash. Children should not be on the cover of magazines and the parents should have the rights to what is published about them.. So over all the trash that is printed about celebs and famous people. They deserve the same privacy and respect for their private lives as the rest of us do.

  • malinda

    Maybe Katie needs the publicity. I dont see that Suri is better off with her than with Tom. Tom’s other kids never had this kind of attention dumped on them.

  • Lou

    Oh please…every child has imaginary friends at one time or another.

  • Lou

    Which is exactly why she is ok being with Katie Holmes. Because of who her parents are; this is going to be a normal part of her life and she needs to learn how to adjust to it from a young age. So far she is doing a great job; she smiles when she wants to , frowns when she wants to and makes faces when she is trying to send the media a message as in leave me alone.

  • http://www.facebook.com/susan.wagner.336717 Susan Wagner

    what six year old doesn’t have imaginary friends? I had imaginary friends til I was like 8.

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities
X