
4:31 pm, February 3rd, 2010
The National Enquirer loves to play games. Today it’s another edition of Celebrity Couples Mix-and-Match, where the tab shakes up a bunch of names like Boggle dice to see who they can link to whom.
Someone should lend the mag Clue.
Having called it quits with Alex Rodriguez, “Kate Hudson is ready for love again – and she’s got her sights set on Justin Timberlake!” the mag reports.
Here we go.
“Kate’s always had a thing for Justin, and after reading that his romance with Jessica Biel is over,” the Enquirer claims, “She’s decided to make her move.”
Uh huh.
According to the tab, their “chemistry” was “evident” when Timberlake and Hudson presented together at the SAG Awards on January 23. (Wow. Amazing that presenters at a televised awards show would seem to get along well.)
Of course, the entire romance is based on the premise that “Kate wouldn’t dream about stealing another girl’s guy” (her so-called “close friend” says) and waited for Timberlake’s relationship with Biel to end.
Sigh. For what seems like the 392nd time: Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel are still together - they were even photographed together the next night at a Radiohead concert.
As for Hudson and Timberlake: They presented together at the SAG Awards, but they are not together.
We can’t wait for next week’s Enquirer, when A-Rod reads about Biel “moving on” from Timberlake and decides to show up on her stoop with flowers.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for the best in accurate celebrity news!
© 2010 Gossip Cop Media | About Us | Privacy | Advertise | User Agreement | Contact
| Archives
| Press
| Hosting by Datagram
|
RSS
I knew that this rumor would pop up again they presented together at the SAG Awards. It has popped up whenever Justin has been seen at Kate Hudson’s parties. Kate and Justin are friends. Have been for a while now since they have houses near each other in LA..
publicists are paid to lie. Why is gossipcop so quick to call out the bad rumors but not the so called good ones.
Just because a PR told you this story is false, dont mean it’s not true.
Apparently Marissa along with National Enquirer missed the pictures of them at the Radiohead concert too. The pictures are out there for anyone to see. The tabloids and blogs have these two along with Brad and Angie pretty much breaking up every week. I think these two couples more then any other celebrity couple they like to make up crap about. Yet lo and behold both couples are still together.
I agree Marrissa but the Kate and Justin story has been around for years. Whenever she is seen at a party of his or she is seen at a party of hers, this rumor pops up. It one of those untrue rumors that never goes away.
That should be she is seen at a party of his.
I dont miss the point ’spinilli’ im saying just because the celebrity PR say the rumor is not true, dont mean it’s not.
and I understand Dawn Marie, im just saying that at the end of the day
publicists are paid to lie. that’s their job and Im trying to figure out why gossipcop is so quick to call out a false rumor about them. when their is rumors like them being engaged are repeated just as much as cheating rumors, but yet they dont call that out.
You dont know what goes on behind closed doors, and the nationl requirer have been right about some stuff. Just sayin
and wow pictures prove alot in hollywood. dont they? so they are ’seen’ out together must mean justin dont cheat and it must mean they are still together
that’s naive talking. you dont know what justin do when he is not with biel. you just dont know
Who knows if Jessica and Justin are really together or not? What I am saying is not true is the part of him hooking with Kate. That has been around for years. That rumor goes back to Christmas of 2007 I believe. Justin had just broken up with Cameron Diaz and I don’t think Kate was with anyone so the tabloids tried to hook them up when Justin was seen as the life of the party at a Christmas gathering that Kate threw. If Kate has always had a thing for Justin, why didn’t she make him hers back then when he was single?
they could have hooked up! I have no doubt they slept together. it’s not hard to believe as much as it not hard to believe he is faithful to his girlfriend
and make him hers? um not everyone wants a serious relationship. ther eis nothing wrong with hooking up without no strings attached. not everyone is a relationship type of person
Wow!Wow!Wow!!!It’s said “FitnessKiss”dot com which brings our fitness love and relationship to us is a fashion website for fit and sexy guys/gals, you gonna check it!!!!!
Shakes head in disbelief over who is so naive they would rather believe all the bad stuff then pictures that are more real. Especially when some of those pictures were taken inside the concert by fans camera phones when justin and jessica didn’t know they were being taken and they were kissing. I’ve never read any rumors of them being engaged either. Just for three years now them being on the outs. Well couples aren’t on the outs for THREE years. They have no reason to stay together if they really didn’t want to. They have no children together and aren’t married. If Justin didn’t want to be with Jessica and vice versa they wouldn’t be. And I frankly, could care less if they are broken up or together since I don’t really care who is dating who in Hollywood. What I hate are the tabloids and bloggers who literally make up stories about all the celebrities.
^ How do you know those pictures were taken by fans? Unless you were there then you don’t know who took them. There were plenty of rumors about them being engaged and Justin had to deny that rumor. If you don’t care then how come when gossip cop talks about them you are always posting a comment.
Agreed with Sandra. because eveidently you do care ’spinnelli’ since you keep coming back and forth commenting on here. taking the time out to post your baseless asumption just because one took photos dont mean or prove Justin and kate did not hook up
Like I sad, publicists are paid to lie. and just because you are tired of the same rumors, dont mean none of them rumors have some truth to it.
~evidently