LMAO. Gossip Slop is now the spin machine for Twilight. (le sigh)

Gossip Cop your awesome. Thank you so much.
About this fake story – That is just so stupid.
Im sure Rob and Kristen are happy together. :)
This sites just write stupid things only fro making money. :)

In the absence of Mr. Pattinson’s confirmation or denial – theories will abound. And it happens, as a circumstance, to pay well too. It pays everyone, but the audience that looks at any of it. Everybody interested knows this. No one is a hapless misunderstood victim in this scenario. You only benefit if you turn away. If you like paying to ride emotional roller coasters without insurance – go ahead. Tear each other to pieces, spill your slushie and when you fall off, or it derails/breaks and your adrenaline response or neurotransmitters exhibit side effects… I hope you can afford it. I hope he and his co-stars/friends/family can too – or, that the money is so good they can buy it away or it doesn’t matter.

Every single one of you is better than this. Elevate.

Mostly, I’ve begun to care about you – women as a collective audience being manipulated or being played to in a base instinct way. I assume you are a human being and that you have vicarious, sometimes vulnerable feelings and sympathies that do feel real. Keep it real, positive and light – project your better self, be inspired, tend your own personal star and you’ll never go wrong. Have a stellar weekend.

*sigh*… Thing is… Robert Pattinson will always be supposedly involved with his co-stars in more than the acting way… ALWAYS!… it’s the pick up line that will drag people’s attention to any movie the actor is in…
According to tabloids: When Twilight, he was involved with Kristen… when Remember Me, with Emilie… when New Moon, back with Kristen… when Bel Ami, I think they tried to put Christina Ricci on it (not sure)… when Eclipse, again Kristen… when Water for Elephants, Reese…
And it’s going to be always like that… only Robert Pattinson himself knows what is going on in his personal life, and it should remain that way and be respected as it’s the way he chose it to be… still, gossip keeps his name around and in a twisted way, that’s good for an actor… like being “alive” in the media… So, it’s all about keeping the balance between still be private and somehow allow the madness have their share without affecting you… I think… ;)

“Let’s pause here to note that HollywoodLife’s habit of addressing celebrities in the second person has gotten no less annoying.”
Ugh!… So true!… Extremely. Annoying. !!!!!… Idiots!… Didn’t you take reporting 101?… Thou shall never address in 2nd person, nor involve 1st person in whatever you are reporting… Oh, well… guess I spent more time in “reporting school” than they did…

Thanks GC… :D

I know I shouldn’t expect more from a website called “Gossip” Cop. I know about GC connection with Summit and Kristen Stewart and I know you guys are just doing your “job” but honestly! This is getting ridiculous. You make OK magazine look good. Well, after all, your founder used to direct US weekly so the difference is not much. Please stop being so obvious and don’t hate on HollywoodLife, you’re not far from them.

Hello pot meet kettle.

@Marie_PR – GossipCop may indeed be “helping” Summit now and again (I suspect that too) but this rumor is still more about Robert Pattinson and Reese Witherspoon than Kristen Stewart. If you read GC’s ‘debunk’, it is ALL ABOUT Rob and Reese not getting romantic. Jim Toth and Kristen Stewart are ancillary names in this rumor. As GC wrote, “we bet Stewart is fine with their behavior.” We can make the leap that Kristen is fine because “she must be dating Robert and all is well with them” or we can take another assumption that Kristen is probably fine because it doesn’t really concern her and being an actress, she knows the drill.

So why assume that this is a concern to Kristen at all insofar as PR is concerned? I doubt she had any concern on this. This post is pure GC picking at HollywoodLife.

And yesterday’s ‘debunk’ was probably more from Reese’s team than anyone’s. She had Jake G. She’s not about to be a Mrs Robinson to another younger actor. Please. Reese doesn’t repeat herself. Her new guy has power; he’s good looking; and he’s in with her children. She’s not going to want anything to mess that up.

This is such crap! I find it funny as hell that they are saying Rob told them on set that he is single. Robert never answers or talks about his private life like that. 1. He and Kristen have tried so hard to keep things under raps. Do they think we would believe that if asked he would tell them Oh, yes Kristen and I are dating? Hell NO!! So, if he did tell anyone he is single it is only to keep the media from finding anything out. I would say the same thing if I were in his shoes. Keeping the relationship a secret for all this time. They are doing it for a reason… So. I do believe he is a charmer. Just look at him.. And it’s great he is getting along so well with Reese. That is what makes a good movie. Actors that care about eachother and work good together. I love Reese! But, I just dont think she would be interested in him other then just friends. She is 34 years old alot older and she is just very mature.. Not saying that he isnt. But, he love to drink and go out. She like to stay home and hang with her two kids and her boyfriend. Totally different lives here people. I wish these sites would just stop with all this bull shit! Thank god we have gossip cop to tell us what we need to know.. And, that is the TRUTH…

Totes Boston – thank you.

I suppose the only point that people make without making it very clearly is this:
Let them be private (and a host of other thoughts and commentary pro and con), but if ticket sales and other profits are allowed to happen with the full knowledge that the majority of paying audiences assume they are romantically involved, yet, they aren’t and refuse to come clean about it clearly and jointly before Eclipse – it’s problematic. Some may say “it doesn’t matter,” “it’s none of anyone’s business,” “it’s the audience’s responsibility for their own beliefs,” “I never confirmed or denied that,” “I did deny that,” “we’re actors – this is a profession and what you see on-screen,” etc. it doesn’t change the fact that many believe it’s true, they pay money being inspired by it and they know this and they profit from it.

The fact is it would have an effect on sales and audiences and people would feel played/betrayed if it’s not true. If it is true, then there’s no problem really – except a transitory one from the people who were already non-supportive (but, they would have a problem anyway, although the timing of disclosure may backlash by taking it out at the box office). The whole “are they or aren’t they” plausible deniability scenario is a precarious position reputation wise for the actors and franchise either way. You can multiply the possible fallout by the fact that the actor’s individual brands and popularity are assumed by the audience to be “genuine,” “real/authentic” and different from other “Hollywood types.”

So, when reports come out (either true or not true) that he or she says they are single or together or playing peek-a-boo – no matter what they are in reality – it generates buzz from the interest I describe above.

It goes like this: A reveal (together or apart), then vague counter-reports follow, then salacious regurgitation, demoralization of audience, debate, expression of feeling, beliefs are set, back to honeymoon phase and followed by a renewal of the cycle again. It’s the classic emotional abuse wheel in domestic violence scenarios – but, in a media marketing sense with many very young women and mega profits involved. It’s exploitative and difficult to escape psychologically.

That’s why, I guess it’s an issue beyond the personal feelings and opinions of the audience. There are defenses if things unravel either way. Here are a few: isolation, rapid news cycles, audience fatigue, amortization of risk professionally (other films that take hold), respected celebrity endorsement, seclusion until things blow over, deniability, sympathetic interviews of explanation, a PR break up “we’re friends I wish them well – we’re still in contact – etc.” Basically, every strategy but being unequivocally clear about it before profits despite consequences – that path hasn’t been chosen.

Aside: If you claim you are immune to or neutral to this dynamic, then you wouldn’t be here reading this right now. Personally, I want and opt out.

I am very disappointed to hear that Gossip Cop may be part of the media hype that supports the Summit/Twilight Franchise. That means we are not getting truly unbiased truth here.

You can learn more about these dynamics I’m talking about here, and decide for yourself if you recognize anything in your experience of what you see and consume:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_manipulation
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/141630/_should_we_ban_manipulative_marketing_/

Oh blah-di-blah. Some of these comments are at best delusional, at worst, totally insane. One good hint that you might be a nutbar–referring to someone by the name of a character they portray.

I only looked at this article because it showed Reese Witherspoon, who’s fairly entertaining, and my 14 yr old cousin keeps bombarding me with stupid Twilight crap via email. This article portrayed no facts, simply conjecture. (Or rather, it claimed to “debunk” former conjecture, with more conjecture.)

I don’t care who the hell either of these kids are dating, I find them both sort of bland and undeveloped. After these movies have been filmed and released, we’ll probably find that Robert Pattison is secretly married to Daniel Radcliff, or Emma Watson. (Believe they worked together on Harry Potter, proof enuff in this set of conversations I’m sure!)

If you get angry and defensive about who someone may or may not be dating when you aren’t dating them, and don’t even know them…you probably need to spend less time on the internet, and more time socializing with people you actually know.