comScore
  1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Busting bad dish!

CLAIM: Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart “On The Verge Of A Split”

Truth rating: 0

(GettyImages.com)

As expected, with Breaking Dawn about to hit theaters, the gossip press is going into overdrive when it comes to Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart.

Life & Style speculates that their public display of affection is Stewart’s “desperate” bid to keep Pattinson.

OK! insists they’re about to wed.

Us Weekly claims Stewart and Pattinson endure a “tortured romance.”

And Star, which is convinced Pattinson has hooked up with Ashley Greene, continues to bang the crisis drum this week, arguing that behind the scenes he and Stewart are “on the verge of a split!”

“Their relationship has always been hot and cold,” explains a so-called “insider” for the tabloid. “And right now it’s icy.”

Stewart was allegedly “livid” after hearing about the (phony) “intimate dates” that Star says Pattinson and Greene shared, and “flew to London on a crisis mission” from her movie set in Wales.

According to the tab’s source, Stewart went to Pattinson’s apartment on October 31 and “ripped him apart for getting so close to Ashley.”

While Pattinson is supposedly “used to Kristen being moody,” the Star insider suspects “it’s starting to get to him,” adding that if Stewart “doesn’t cool it with the jealousy, it could be the end.”

In other words, Star equates an unsubstantiated fight based on nonexistent envy over a bogus flirtation with being “on the verge of a split.”

The fact that Pattinson and Stewart looked perfectly happy together a few days later means nothing to Star, because it’s all (allegedly) a front for their secret bickering over Greene.

In reality, though, things remain as they’ve been and as Gossip Cop has reported consistently.

A source close to the couple tells us there’s absolutely no truth to talk of an imminent breakup or jealous fights.

Check out PHOTOS of Robert and Kristen at “Twilight” Convention in L.A.!

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

You might like:


  • Robsessed1986

    Same old shit……….

  • fakerbuster

    it never ends

  • guest

    Funny thing though – her movie set is in London, Wales was a location shoot a while back that lasted a week, and the London apartment is her apartment, but I guess it may be considered theirs. But it is Star magazine, so I’m not surprised they can’t get easily verifiable details correct while they make up their BS.

  • http://twitter.com/aimzers84 Aimzers84

    I think its HILARIOUS that the rags get their bogus stories from the nonstens spouting bullshit on the internet. They cant even write their own stories, they have to depend on the crazy fans to feed them shit.

  • fedup

    they all need to get a life and leave then alone.

  • Me

    Your sh!tt!ng me right?

    They get their bogus stories from both sides of the argument and then they add a little bit of crap they pulled out of their own a$$e$.

    There is a chick who writes sort of fanfictions based on a day in the life of Robert pattinson. Do you have any idea how often there have been quotes taken from her stories to back up gossip sites/mags stories?

    And she is excessively robsten.

    Pull your finger out. Us fans created this media monster. We are the reason they can’t catch a break. Has nothing to do with what side of the debate we are on. If we weren’t so interested they would never print any stories.

  • jae

    And to think, there is still another year of it to go? Lord have mercy.

  • jae

    By the sheer definition of the word Nonsten, I doubt that this is coming from a nonsten since it has always been the Robsten complaint that Nonstens don’t believe they are a couple, so why in the world would a Nonsten create such a drivel story such as this one? It does not make any sense. Nonsten’s stories would be on the borderline of debunking this based on the simple fact that you cannot split up with someone you are not actually involved with. This stinks of media manipulation generated by the gossip sites that like to get the hits for their sites. It is neither owned by the Robstens or the Nonstens.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DEAGOE3FWCWYCD242ZH5TK37BE Ana Liliana

    Dios!cada cosa…..

  • Under

    HD celebs pics site……
    http://picshits.blogspot.com/

  • guest

    Same old news trying to keep up BD on the news.
    This movie is doomed for failure due to the promos done by the actors who cannot say one good thing about the film they are promoting. Instead of making jokes, flirting & showing the world they donot care & want to move on.

    Stewart should concentrate on her career. Avoid all connections to this man to prevent further hatred from his obsessed fans. Her life will be better. Move on. Hold yher head high & concentrate on the LA premiere since apparently that is the only one she is allowed to attend according to the new gf at his side.
    And you know it.

  • Sssssssssss

    to Guess HOW CAN GO TO ALL THE PREMIERE WHEN SHE FLIMING SNOW WHITE ? tell me now

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/64716701@N07/ JerryD

    … different day. ;-)

  • Luna

    As expected, with Breaking Dawn about to hit theaters, GOSSIP COP is going into overdrive when it comes to Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart.

  • ohhh?

    Really.. what a powerful gf that must be to able to demand that. Reese?

  • Anonymous

    Wait one moment. Is gossip cop out to bust bad dish or are they a promo PR site for summit entertainment’s movie breaking dawn. As in throw out anything just keep the interest alive in Rob and Kristen no matter what.

  • calypso

    “A source close to the couple tells us there’s absolutely no truth to talk of an imminent breakup or jealous fights.” <– I honestly hope that GC doesn't check with Rob's or Kristen's teams or whoever is their source every time they write a denial article about another lie in a tabloid. I can imagine the conversation every single day being like "hey! GC again. Guess what?' and the bored answer "nope, same as yesterday and the day before, still happily dating, no drama. Bye, talk to you tomorrow".
    Seriously tabloids should let them alone, they have nothing to talk about, there's no drama, no scandal, in Rob and Kristen's life, focuse on other celebrities that would enjoy the attention or do have all kinds of things to be talked about. Never gonna happen I know though ;)

  • http://twitter.com/Nathiest Nathiest

    PR site for Summit.

  • Anonymous

    Am I the only one suprised by all the Robert and Kristen stories this week?
    I mean, what has it been, like 5 stories?

    People should just let them be!

  • Guest1

    Of course there is no talk of a imminent break up, BD still has one more movie to come out LOL. Anyone who believes they are a REAL couple really needs their head checked.

  • guest1

    And GC you should stop why you are kinda ahead you are looking more and more desparate to sell this movie *rolls eyes*. Guess if there was no epic lurve it would not sell huh……tells you how much Summit believes the actors talent themselves could be enough to sell this movie.

  • Concerned health care pro

    Seriously, get yourself some help…

  • Carters007

    Aaaah to be so young and immature. Stewart is young and rumored to treat Pattison like her boy toy whenever she feels like it. One minutes she’s all over him and the next she’s treating him like crap, ignoring his calls, etc. I chalk all this HOT MESS up to juvenile immaturity in its purist form. Nothing to cry home about.

  • crmomof2

    Last year the only premiere that Rob went to was in LA because he was working on WTF. Kristen and Taylor did NY and the other cast members did London, etc. Kristen and Taylor did most of the promotion while Rob was filming. He did some shows just like Kristen is doing now. It’s the same situation here. The only thing stopping Kristen is her work schedule. Even this “girlfriend” you mentioned was for real Summit or any other production company would always prefer that one of the leads in the film to be there to promote the film over anyone’s boyfriend or girlfriend.

    To quote you “And you know it.”

  • crmomof2

    Some one should tell Reese’s husband.

  • guest

    Last minute call for GC to be rpattz pr company. why is he afraid the film will fail & his earnings will be less? It sounds that rp is nervous about his future. He should be. After all those rumored roles & yet no announcements yet. Maybe in 10yrs. a role will be made specially for him.

    Another naive 17yr.old will need someone who has “chemistry” & rpattz can auditon. he will get the job.
    it will earn millions ala twilight. he will get her into bed. when the next richer gal comes along she will be dropped like a hot potato.
    karma never sleeps. never forget that. rpapttz more problems will come your way. what you did & still doing is unforgivable & donot pretend to make it better now just because BD premiere is around the corner. you are not that good an actor. karma karma karma. what goes around comes around.

  • Me

    Oh will you please bugger off?

    I can’t wait till you get your dose of karma.

  • French Flies

    Hey Gossip Cop – what do their REPS say? Why rely on sources when they have REPS?

    I swear this site is getting some hefty checks from Kristen’s PR people. I don’t think poorly of her, but I do hate having the BS shoved at me all the time. First, she’s an innocent indie actress. Then, she’s an awkward, overwhelmed Rock ‘N Roll introvert. Then, she’s a victim of the papz, the fans, and the press so she gives people the finger and drops F-bombs while proclaiming that she never wanted this fame. Now, she’s a mainstream actress with a handsome “boyfriend” who is glamourous and fashionable and all kinds of grateful and giggly. Can’t they just settle on one image, or are they hoping to find one that makes her popular?

  • French Flies

    Their film is coming out. All these stories are part of the PR campaign to convince people that they are dating, in the hope of selling tickets to the film.

  • Smokin

    The Star has some of that right. Whatever their relationship is, it has always been hot and cold. He’s told her to take a hike a couple of times and she’s very jealous and moody, prone to throwing temper tantrums which is a complete turn off for him. Why do you think they spend so much time apart? It’s not just their careers, Rob has proved that this year when he stayed for so long in LA without her.

    She just told the New Zealand Herald that they are good friends. This is months after she blabbed about him being her boyfriend. You notice he’s given hundreds of interviews since that came out and not once confirmed it. He hardly talks about her at all, even in the context of Bella in the film.

    Here’s what she said: Talk of babies and weddings should heighten talk about her reported real-life romance with co-star Pattinson, but Stewart describes the relationship she has with Pattinson – and her other co-star Lautner – as being “just very, very, very good friends”.

    She’s not saying he’s her boyfriend any more. He was probably steamed about that, which has led to this new Star article.

  • Belinda

    Rob didn’t wait in London over Halloween to fly back to LA with her, he got his backs and flew right back, even though he didn’t have any interviews or any work to do. He could have waited and flown back on the same plane with her but he chose not to. Why? If they’re so close, why don’t they spend any time together outside of a day here and there? He hasn’t been working since he stopped filming in July. He could be in London if he wanted to. Actions speak louder than words.

  • True_Dat

    Interesting, you’re right, that ring doesn’t say Rob, it just looks like quote marks or curly qs. The other thing I notice is that she’s supposed to be so professional and into fashion now, but she bites her nails and can’t be bothered to get a manicure before presenting herself at a public event where she’s representing the film.

    I call that unprofessional. It doesn’t take that long to get a manicure, maybe a half hour. She’s always going place with her nails looking like crap. I thought she was supposed to be all girly now, that’s what she said in that magazine where she was on the cover in a bathing suit, trying to look glamourous.

  • True_Dat

    Interesting, you’re right, that ring doesn’t say Rob, it just looks like quote marks or curly qs. The other thing I notice is that she’s supposed to be so professional and into fashion now, but she bites her nails and can’t be bothered to get a manicure before presenting herself at a public event where she’s representing the film.

    I call that unprofessional. It doesn’t take that long to get a manicure, maybe a half hour. She’s always going place with her nails looking like crap. I thought she was supposed to be all girly now, that’s what she said in that magazine where she was on the cover in a bathing suit, trying to look glamourous.

  • Bopeep

    Her PR are working overtime at trying to reshape her image. She must keep them busy, what with the way she’s always sticking her foot in her mouth, swearing and smoking. Did you see her on Kimmel last night, cringing when he talked about the “love making” in the movie? She literally shuddered and said she hated those words. Who hates the words “love making”? Don’t most people think that’s beautiful, especially when describing a honeymoon? He changed it to “sex scene” and she said she preferred that. She needs her head examined.

  • Bopeep

    Her PR are working overtime at trying to reshape her image. She must keep them busy, what with the way she’s always sticking her foot in her mouth, swearing and smoking. Did you see her on Kimmel last night, cringing when he talked about the “love making” in the movie? She literally shuddered and said she hated those words. Who hates the words “love making”? Don’t most people think that’s beautiful, especially when describing a honeymoon? He changed it to “sex scene” and she said she preferred that. She needs her head examined.

  • French Flies

    HEY GOSSIP SLOP – Kristen denied she was more than friends with Robert to the NZ Herald. Will you now admit you are no better than a tabloid?

    Kristen Stewart finds a terrible beauty in the birth scene from Breaking Dawn, writes Peter Mitchell

    EXPAND
    Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are nearly at the conclusion of their Twilight story. Photo / Supplied
    The new chapter of the multibillion-dollar Twilight film franchise has its beautiful scenes, most notably the wedding of Bella Swan to her vampire love Edward Cullen.

    The movie also has its gore.

    Blood should be expected in a movie involving werewolves and vampires, but in a particular scene involving the birth of a child, some audience members may feel as faint as a victim of a werewolf or vampire bite.

    At the centre of the beauty and gore in The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1, the fourth film of the series based on author Stephenie Meyer’s bestselling book series, is Kristen Stewart, the actress who plays Bella Swan, the central female character and the object of affection for Cullen the vampire and Jacob Black the werewolf.

    In the wedding scene Stewart wears a Carolina Herrera wedding dress and in the birth scene … well, let’s not get into too much detail.

    Surprisingly, the 21-year-old Stewart found the wedding and birth scenes equally beautiful.

    “It’s pretty gnarly, I know,” Stewart, recalling the scene where Swan gives birth, says during an interview in Beverly Hills. “I find it grotesquely beautiful.

    “I loved it even though there was blood everywhere.

    “I have never viewed the baby as a demon, but everything that makes the scene horrifying to others, I find beautiful.

    “I was really moved in a motherly way.”

    What? The scene, to be watched by millions of teenage girls devoted to the Twilight franchise, could be the best advertisement for reducing teenage pregnancy, but did Stewart really think it was beautiful?

    “I think some experiences awaken things inside of you,” Stewart explains.

    “I love animals, but I’m the youngest in my family so I have never had an inclination toward babies, but instantly the idea of it being yours, it is so different.

    “It is what I really loved about Bella in this. It was so simple, raw and feral. It wasn’t anything complicated. It was just so human and I really loved that.”

    It is a sure bet that Twilight fans will fill theatres around the globe to watch Breaking Dawn, the penultimate chapter, with the final instalment arriving in November 2012.

    The first three films grossed US$1.8 billion ($2.3 billion) worldwide in cinemas, sold more than 25 million DVDs in the US alone and transformed Stewart, Robert Pattinson (Cullen) and Taylor Lautner (Black) into three of the highest-profile and highest-paid actors in the world.

    They will earn US$12.5 million per movie for the final two Twilight films. On top of that they will pocket 2.5 per cent of each movie’s box office gross, a huge sum considering both movies should tally up more than US$500 million in receipts.

    While the birth scene made Stewart a little clucky, the wedding scene also made her glow.

    A fan of the Twilight books, Stewart has been looking forward to shooting the scene where she walks down the aisle from the moment she read Meyer’s description in the book.

    “That scene is what we have been building to for four years,” Stewart says.

    “It is kind of the most important thing in the whole movie. We shot it at the end and I really got a full experience.

    “I think about it as something that happened to me, rather than something I made.

    “Usually when you think about scenes you remember what you are going through and the choices and conversations you have with the director. That day was so intense.”

    Talk of babies and weddings should heighten talk about her reported real-life romance with co-star Pattinson, but Stewart describes the relationship she has with Pattinson – and her other co-star Lautner – as being “just very, very, very good friends”.

    “I have something really special with both of them that really couldn’t have been gotten without an experience like this,” she says.

    “It doesn’t always happen. Just because you have a good experience with an actor, sometimes you finish a movie and you say ‘We have to see each other’ and then you go ‘Wow, we know each other very much within that’.

    “That’s not what we have. We got lucky and I think maybe it shows. That’s why we had such a good time working together.”

    Stewart smiles, attempting to fully explain the relationship she shares with Pattinson and Lautner.

    “Those guys are … ,” she says, pausing for a moment. Her mind is attempting to find the right words and eventually she comes up with two words.

    “They’re mine,” Stewart says.

  • Sade

    Well who is her english boyfriend then??

  • Cynthia

    The English boyfriend comment was made in July, months ago. This New Zealand Herald quote is from the press junket last week. The English boyfriend has very pointedly said NOTHING. He hasn’t confirmed anything, has he? In dozens of interviews since her quote came out, he’s kept silent. What does that tell you? He’s not rushing to her rescue, to admit he’s her boyfriend, is he?

    And now she comes out and says they’re just very good friends. Sounds like she’s trying to back up and retract her statement. She pushed and found out Rob wasn’t going to play her game. He’s still single, anyone should be able to see that. Of course they’re friendly at these fan events, they’re being paid to promote a film. They could even be friends with benefits but that doesn’t translate to “boyfriend” in Rob’s mind. Anyway, he hasn’t said anything to back up what she said. And they aren’t spending time with each other, either. He got his bags in London and went right back to LA instead of waiting and flying back with her, which he could have done, he didn’t have any engagements in LA.

  • Robsessed1986

    I’m gonna look this up. Like you, I also see that something has been off this year. Thanks for the info.!

  • Robsessed1986

    Good question……

  • Robsessed1986

    WOW!! The copy & pasted interview from the New Zealand Herald of KS was removed. I wonder who did this and why they did it?

  • Sade

    Good question???

  • French Flies

    They continue to remove my posts pointing to a recent interview where Kristen denies dating Robert. I am confused because I think I am being quite civil.

  • Sade

    Interesting it is all over the Internet and in the tabloid so them removing it does nothing now.

  • French Flies

    I am just hoping that all the people who believed this showmance was real will hold the news outlets accountable for their lies. I also hope, earnestly, that people in general will be able to see how they have been manipulated as a marketing strategy. People have been quite mean to one another online over this supposed relationship and the only ones to win were the actors and studio who benefitted from he publicity.

  • Sade

    Now lets see how many comments this gets up to now. Any bets anyone???

  • French Flies

    I can almost guarantee that since ours will be removed to maintain the illusion, the count won’t go that high, LOL!

    RECAP: Kristen has denied dating Robert. This site has removed any post alluding to it.

  • Sade

    Well regardless if they are not together or are together, I am still going to see the movie. Why can’t people just be honest and go with the flow why if they are not dating do people have to push something that is not meant to be?

  • Georgina

    They removed it because you posted the whole thing instead of just a paragraph. It’s copyright infringement if you post the whole thing. Just post her quote and where it comes from, they’ll allow that. It’s posted above by someone else. She told the NZ Herald that they were “very, very good friends.” Nothing more. She’s trying to dig herself out of her blunder in Glamour UK. Her trick of trying to make him confess that he is her BF didn’t work. He’s older and smarter than she is. She’s wasting her time, a guy who talks about prenups and divorce is not in love and not anywhere close to getting serious.

  • Matilda

    I don’t think it was for PR, I think they were just friends with benefits but the shippers demanded that it be some epic romance. Rob has never talked about her, not at all. He answered one question on the red carpet in Germany. One. And he was rushing along, he didn’t have time to explain the difference between Kristen and Bella.

    I think she wanted more but he’s never seemed inclined to do that. She’s followed him all over the world, but the two times he ever went to see her while she was working, he had TomStu with him. And when he goes to London, he goes to see his family and friends. It’s never really what you could call romantic. And when they are seen out, it’s always with a group of people. Looks a lot more like FWB than a real romance.

  • French Flies

    Thanks for clearing that up. They also deleted some of my other posts about the same topic that did not have a direct quote from the article and I lumped it together.

  • French Flies

    I would truly love to agree with you, but there definitely was a PR benefit to not bursting the Robsten bubble while the series was in full swing. Their reps refused to comment on it. Their friends refused to comment on it. The cast mates stopped commenting on it after Rachelle LeFevre was let go two weeks after saying they were just friends. Media was forbidden to ask about it. And finally, Robert and Kristen stopped denying it, and, instead, participated in heavily papped “dates” that also included bodyguards, friends, and management. The only people willing to go on record that they were dating were people directly related to the promotion of the films like the directors.

    As a result, the series had their real life Edward and Bella. It sold a tremendous amount of tickets and the tabloid coverage of their relationship (the “bad dish”) kept them in the public eye between films.

    I have to say that Kristen has never seemed into Robert. She rarely says anything kind about him other than that he understands her. They have always seemed more brother/sister to me than anything. I hope the perspective that she wanted more and he declined does not get fed by the gossip mags as a way to cast blame onto one to save face for the other. PR works that way. Someone has to ride under the bus.

  • Anonymous

    She is talking about Rob and Taylor not about romantic relationships.

  • Anonymous

    It is “obvious” it is Rob.

  • Anonymous

    She was talking about Rob and Taylor, they didn’t ask if she was dating them, the quote was taken out of context.

  • Anonymous

    You guys are so predictable, you make up a ton of excuses for Kristen’s GQ interview where it is a very clear confirmation that Rob is her boyfriend and you refuse to believe it. You refuse to believe she has Bear with her and that Rob was at her place in London. Yet here is this one quote where she is talking about filming with Rob and Taylor over the years and how important they are to her and trying to describe what they mean to her and suddenly that is a confirmation that they are not together. Really? I think I missed in that article the question being asked if they were a couple or not. Now if Kristen’s answer was in response to that you would have a point, but it isn’t, there is no such question.

  • Anonymous

    Oh stop. It is no conspiracy. You know GC deletes most links unless it is a photo site or YouTube.

  • jae

    It really doesn’t matter, I found it, I read it. What difference does it make if they removed the comment that posted it? It is out there for the reading, right? Nothing got accomplished by the removal. I still would be interested in that secret world behind what everyone thinks is real, wouldn’t you?

  • jae

    From the NZ Hearald interview:

    Talk of babies and weddings should heighten talk about her reported real-life romance with co-star Pattinson, but Stewart describes the relationship she has with Pattinson – and her other co-star Lautner – as being “just very, very, very good friends”.

    “I have something really special with both of them that really couldn’t have been gotten without an experience like this,” she says.

    What is out of context?

  • Anonymous

    They have removed several of my links too, they just remove links to other news and gossip sites. Only photo, blog and youtube links don’t get removed. No one is trying to hide anything here.

  • Anonymous

    For one thing, where is the beginning of the sentence and another, what question is she responding to? On another post, I placed the quote where I believe it came from, it is in the paragraph where she is talking about Rob and Taylor, she is NOT talking about her private life with Rob here, there is a huge difference. Below I put the quote in where I suspect it originally came from.

    “I have something really special with both of them that really couldn’t have been gotten without an experience like this,” she says.”It doesn’t always happen. Just because you have a good experience with an actor, sometimes you finish a movie and you say ‘We have to see each other’ and then you go ‘Wow, we know each other very much within that’. That’s not what we have. We got lucky and I think maybe it shows. [We're] just very, very, very good friends [and] that’s why we had such a good time working together.”

    See how the context is much different in that she is not answering a question if they are dating or not? What was said above is way different than her conversation with GQ about how it is obvious that she is dating Rob. She is not denying it here.

  • Brenda

    They’ve played a “couple” on screen since 2008 in 5 films, including the last one where they simulate lots of sex. I think they’re very comfortable with each other and touching doesn’t mean anything.

    Have you forgotten how Taylor reached over and adjusted her bra strap on MTV? He sure didn’t have any physical boundaries with her, either. What you see in public doesn’t mean anything, it’s what goes on behind closed doors that counts, and Rob’s chosen to spend his vacation time in LA, not London, where he could be near KStew.

    He’s admitted he hasn’t been working since July, so all those lame excuses about why he wasn’t in the UK have proved to be pathetic attempts by shippers to justify why he doesn’t choose to spend the majority of his time with her. So he said he was in London, for a couple of day, and then right back to LA. She’s not a priority in his life, no mattter how much you wish she was. He tolerates her, he’s not in love. If he were, he would spend his vacation time close to her, he wouldn’t talk about prenups and divorces. He’s just not that into her. He hasn’t been since they stopped filming BD.

  • Luna

    Funny. When she talks of an “English boyfriend” during a photo shoot, without ever naming anyone, and this quote finds its way in a magazine, it is viewed and celebrated as a “very clear confirmation” (as per chelcp below) that she is dating Robert Pattinson. When she answers a question about Robert Pattinson and yes, Taylor Lautner as well (the journalist was fair enough to precise it), and says that they are “just very, very, very good friends”, then of course it’s taken out of context and shouldn’t be believed in a thousand years…

    Yet I’ve just finished reading it and the entire article makes sense and there’s nothing out of context (quite te contrary).

    I just wish people who take an obscure quote from GQ as gospel truth would, at least, not disregard something as telling as published in the NZ Herald.

  • Robsessed1986

    No, I read it myself, she is speaking of the three of them.

  • Robsessed1986

    They were NOT links, I saw them literally minutes before their removal. It was the interview of KS conducted by the New Zealnd Herald in Hollywood last week. That was why I went and checked out the interview myself.

  • Robsessed1986

    Oh I’m very interested in that comment made by Rob, very interested. No, it isn’t all that important that that interview posted here was removed because it was too late. Did you read it before or after I e-mailed the info to you? Because, had I been just a few minutes late on getting to GC, I would never have seen it.

  • Robsessed1986

    Well said Luna!!

  • Robsessed1986

    You are being very civil, but that is not why they are taking it down. I happened to read what you put up just minutes before they deleted it. Thanks for posting it! They usually only take down links however, this was not the case with your comments, as I saw no links posted at all.

  • Robsessed1986

    No, it was not the whole interview that she posted. I read it and then immediately went and found it on the New Zealand Herald website. It was not the whole thing. Besides, she posted the proper credits to the New Zealand Herald. From a legal standpoint, that is all that was needed.

  • Robsessed1986

    That’s right, we should hold the news outlets responsible for their outright lies. I will do my best to do so.

  • Robsessed1986

    I don’t think Rob was as complicit in all this as some may believe, after all he was the one that had HIS friends along on these so-called “dates.” Right?
    And I NEVER went to see these movies because of the whole pr thing. In fact, it wasn’t for Rob either. It was because I saw the first Twilight, after refusing to because I tend to like the more traditional vampire movies, and was hooked. I read all the books within one week and was further hooked into it all. My love of Rob was because of his music to begin with, then because of his acting, followed by his personality and the great way he treats his fans!

  • Luna

    Thank you! ;-)

    And if you are fond of semantics, you may have noticed she didn’t say “we are very good friends”, or “such good friends” or whatever, she said “JUST very, very, very good friends”. I think that was the point of the whole paragraph.

  • Robsessed1986

    “very clear confirmation”? Very clear confirmation would have been, my bf, Rob, is English. You simply choose to infer her meaning of whom she was speaking. Now you won’t believe her? Strange……

  • Robsessed1986

    Your welcome! And I would have to agree with you.

  • Anonymous

    I just discovered a website called rob’s closet and its so funny I cant stop laughing. it pokes wicked fun at the main twilight players especially rob of course. dont go there if four letter words bother you.

  • Anonymous

    many people believe in edward and bella and if the movie delivers in the love scenes then it will do very well at the box office and the dvds will fly off the shelves. Its all about edward and bella its their love story and if rob and kristen are not a couple so what. I happen to believe they have something special. who knows if it will stand the test of time. the twilight movies will.

  • Anonymous

    He went to London AT LEAST 3 times, but of course you forget that.

    He wasn’t working on a movie but he said he was reading lots of scripts. That entails meetings with his agent and manager in LA. He also was seen in recording studios and doing ADR for BD.

    Are you a Rob fan, because you sure seem to enjoy making him out to be a douchebag. Good job!

    Oh and of course you forget about Kristen’s GQ article. You can keep telling yourself that she isn’t a priority in his life but that doesn’t make it true.

  • Anonymous

    She was talking about ROB AND TAYLOR and she was not asked about dating. Good grief.

    The GQ article was very specific about what and who she was talking about, you just want to live in denial.

  • good luck

    can we not just watch BD and don’t care what these two do in private…in the Movie they are Edward and Bella

  • Anonymous

    I know that but she was not answering a question if they were dating or not. There is a difference. It is not a denial like you are wishing it to be.

  • Anonymous

    I know what interview it is, GC removes links all the time if they aren’t approved sites to prevent spam. It isn’t a conspiracy.

  • Anonymous

    No, you choose to ignore how she said said it was obvious when the reporter was talking about the speculation about her and Rob. The interviewer said rob. You ignore that she said her boyfriend is English and pretend that she has some hidden English boyfriend when that doesn’t make sense because it is not obvious when you google her. You ignore all the times they visit each other when working, you ignore the photos of them holding hands, you ignore him trying to kiss her at his big premiere, you ignore the fact that he was rubbing her butt at the handprint ceremony, you ignore that they have been seen by so many people holding hands and kissing, you ignore that they share Bear, you ignore so many things that I could list for hours it is so pointless to waste my time because NOTHING will ever convince you.

    Of course I believe that she said that she, Rob and Taylor are very close friends, but you keep ignoring that she was not answering a question if they were dating. It is strange that you can’t tell the difference. One thing I know for a fact is that you will ignore everything between these two but stick to this quote out of context as proof of a denial for months to come just so you can sleep at night and watch BD because you said you couldn’t do that if they were a couple. You wouldn’t even believe it if Rob said it, you would come up with some other excuse.

  • Robsessed1986

    No one posted any links, they copy and pasted part of the interview and that is what was removed. In any case, they only remove the links, not the ENTIRE comment. This, for whatever reason, was the exception.

  • jae

    I know how to read. There is nothing wrong with my comprehension skills. You are talking about the paragraph after the statement was made. The writer stated that: All the talk, (obviously,because of the context of the movie’s theme), about babies and wedding ‘should’ heighten talk about her ‘real-life relationship’ with co-star Pattinson, but Stewart describes the ‘relationship’ ‘she’ has with ‘Pattinson’ –and her other costar Lautner– as being “just very, very, very good friends.” *btw, I copied and pasted directly from the NZ Hearld’s web site which is why a stated same before the post*

    As for my comprehension of what you added, she is talking about the working relationships that form when she works with other actors/actresses that develop during the filming process where everyone is close and familiar and hang out together that when she finishes a movie, they all want to hook up again just to hang out but at the end of the day, you realize, hence her words”Wow, we know each other very much within that.” (meaning the ‘work environment’). All she is saying after that is that between her, Rob and Taylor they got lucky in the fact that they became friends and have that bond from working together for four years straight and they all have solid friendships that will last and their genuine like for each other shows. And they are lucky. I have worked with people for 13 years, these people were like family, we partied together, we were there for each other, the whole nine yards, but once the work environment was no longer there to support said friendships? People move on with their lives and let go of what only worked within the work environment. It is just a fact of life. Some times? What connects you also separates you. That is just how life works. Personally, I would like to believe that all of them will remain friends. After four years and counting until the last movie is promoted, it would be a damn shame if these people, not just the main three, let those friendships go.

  • Robsessed1986

    No, I have said before, and I will say it again…..When Rob owns it, I’ll believe it. If nothing will ever convince me then why do you insist on trying? Short of Rob saying, or doing something that owns up to this, I will continue to believe as I do. There really should be no argument about what I believe because my beliefs are my own. I make some comments, but I don’t believe any are to shove my version of the truth down anyone’s throat. I discuss what I believe with like minded people, you choose to reply to me in an attempt to draw me into an argument of what I believe and why I believe it. Why bother? And yes, I said something to the effect of not wanting to watch the sex scenes in BD IF I thought they were a couple because I would feel as though I am intruding upon them, that much is true. But, I was trying for a response that maybe it would be difficult for any robsten to watch that scene and not feel like they were intruding. Obviously you robstens don’t feel that way, and that’s fine. Whatever floats your boat. I will watch BD because I love the movies and books, it is just a movie after all, and my feelings of whether Rob and KS are together or not really have no bearing on that, they never have. I watch them kiss in the movies all the time, it doesn’t bother me at all.
    What I read in that interview was KS saying that she, Rob, and Taylor are “JUST very, very, very good friends”, nothing less than that and nothing more. It doesn’t matter if she was asked a question of whether they are dating or not. What she said speaks for itself. You can interpret those words any way you like, it is a free country after all. So why can I not choose how I want to interpret those same words? Why does it have to be your way?
    I believe what I believe in part because of what I see, but mostly it is based on what Rob has said. I believe him, just because he hasn’t said anything in a while doesn’t mean he is admitting anything. The absence of denial is not an admission of anything. Besides, since her GQ interview, which I believe he knew of in advance, he has said NOTHING to confirm what she said. In fact, his actions then, and after, that interview were done speak volumes I would say.
    I will no longer defend my position to you, or any robsten for that matter, anymore. If you choose to butt into my conversation with someone else, that’s your choice, just know that I will not respond to it and your words will fall upon deaf ears. I do not wish to hear what YOU have to say, or what ANY robsten has to say, because the only words that count are those from Rob at this point. Besides, what can you say that you haven’t already said, and what more can you say that I have not already heard? Let me qualify my statement a little……I will no longer respond to any reply you make to my comments regarding Robsten. Have a good night!! I’m off to bed….

  • jae

    The thing I find funny about the entire GQ article? She said a whole lot more than that one statement, yet that is all anyone seems to focus on. I did read the article and she did say a whole lot more than just that, which brings my point of selective reading into play. The fan base only focuses on what they want to believe and if there is nothing worth noting, they read between lines that are just not there. At the end of the day, all it creates is the need for people to continue to invade their privacy and encroach on their lives looking for “evidence” that is truly none of anyone’s effing business. And as Rob has stated many times, in the absence of a good story, they just make them up. The only problem with that is that there are so many people out there in the world that believe the garbage and the gossip and the rumors and it really does not matter what is real or not. Time will always tell, won’t it?

  • Robsessed1986

    True, true……
    I read that article, too and didn’t notice anything between the lines. And yes, only time will tell.

  • Anonymous

    Yes they poke fun at twilight cast and not in a sick way. I laughed.

  • Anonymous

    Its about edward and bella yes but Rob and Kristen put human faces to them. Edward and bella are forever and never going to grow old and twilight movie will be rediscovered again and again.

  • Anonymous

    I think even Rob and Kristen read it and laugh. Twilight is so big it can handle humour like this.

  • Anonymous

    But this is what I am saying, she is talking about how the three of them have become close from working on the movies, she isn’t talking about her private relationship with Rob and she was not responding to a question about if they were dating or not. There was no denying Rob as her boyfriend in anything she said. That is not what she was talking about, it was the author just trying to start drama.

  • Anonymous

    chelcp: ann curry is a thoroughly reputable reporter and not a gossip columnist so If at the end of her recent interview with robert pattinson she said you have a beautiful girlfriend, then I believe her and she was referring to kristen. that holds true for this point in time. rob did not correct ann curry and he would have if her comment wasnt true. instead he smiled. I took another look at the handprint video and he’s touching her ass alright. taylor is a friend a very good friend and he wouldnt dare do that.

  • Anonymous

    She definitely said a lot more in that article. She talked about how the twilight fans are crazy, there is no denying that. She talked about all of the factions of the fandom. I am sure both she and Rob think we are all nuts and I don’t blame them. Their relationship isn’t anyone’s business but you are here discussing it and so is Robsessed so you can’t pretend to be innocent of it. We are all part of the problem aren’t we? I get defensive here because I can’t stand people like Alyssa who make Rob out to be a douchebag. I get tired of people making up lies about Rob making him out to be a manwhore because they can’t handle that he is with Kristen. I just wish people would accept it and move on.

    I wish their privacy wasn’t invaded, it would be nice if people stopped tweeting about their whereabouts and paps stopped following them around. It would be nice if people stopped searching twitter and facebook for their whereabouts. I know they are a couple, I don’t need anything proven to me, but as long as there are people out there wanting proof that they are together and counting days of them being apart, there are going to be people searching to show them proof that they are together. It is a vicious cycle that will never end. I don’t actively search for any kind of proof, I just see tweets RT’d on my feed or posted on other fansites. The nonstens scrutinize every little pic and article as much as they accuse the Robstens of doing.

  • Luna

    “It would be nice if people stopped searching twitter and facebook for their whereabouts.” “I don’t actively search for any kind of proof, I just see tweets RT’d on my feed or posted on other fansites.” Give me a break. All the pics and the videos you’ve posted in the past on this site didn’t come solely from Twitter. And I recall some story you blabbed about KS’s brother’s Facebook, so don’t tell us you don’t look for things when you do. You actively search for them AND repost them here, which makes you complicit in spreading rumours and scrutinizing their personal relationship. Stop making yourself look better than the rest of us. At least, be honest enough to admit you are invested in all of this. Heck, you’re here practically every hour of every day, I even wonder if you ever sleep.

    You know they are dating and you don’t need any proof? Good for you.

  • Luna

    I did say previously that she was talking about both Taylor and Rob. Do you choose to be dense on purpose? And what does it matter that the question was about dating or not? If I talk about one, two or three of my male friends and I tell someone they’re “just” very good friends, it means that’s what they are and nothing more. In fact, I would use the “just” to emphasize they are are nothing more.

    Now chelcp, I’m a little tired with you and your condescending answers to just about every poster who disagree with you. I am not going to reply to you anymore.

    Btw, just like jae and everybody else here, I know how to read and I don’t need lessons from you. Thank you.

  • Anonymous

    If you are going to post on a public board then people are free to butt into your conversations. This is not your private chat room and if you only want to talk to like-minded people then maybe you should only post on private nonsten sites,

    Why should Rob say anything to confirm what she said? I mean other than telling the world that they are married in the eyes of the church and in so many ways. They have both said repeatedly that their private life isn’t for sale. They are not going to make any outright confirmation. How many times does this have to be repeated?

  • Anonymous

    Chelcp: I dont think you make yourself look better than the rest of us or ever act condescending and I like reading your posts. Kristen would not be afraid to refute the english boyfriend comment in the GQ article if it wasnt true. I dont think rob would have just smiled at ann curry and not refuted it if her comment about his beautiful girlfriend wasnt true. maybe what rob and kristen have isnt an eternal passionate love for the ages like edward and bella (time will tell) but I’m willing to bet there is something going on between them and its a lot more than just being very good friends.

  • Anonymous

    @Herbee. I am looking forward to the passion between Edward and Bella and the broken headboard. Its more exciting than thinking of what Rob and Kristen are doing.

  • Vilimaite23

    i didin’t see these photos :((

  • sara

    Beautiful unseen photos of your celebs……..

    http://picshits.blogspot.com/

  • Liddy

    People keep asking him questions about being English, so of course he’s talking about it. It’s not some secret code, grow up, and quit trying to twist his words.

    Did you hear him say that “women like it when you confirm ownership.”? So he admits that he knows women like it when someone steps up and admits that he’s her boyfriend. And yet, he refuses to do so. I think that says it all.

  • Concerned

    Kristen doesn’t know you and will never be your friend, and you will never get to Rob through her. You are wasting your time acting like her guard dog. She calls her own fans gangsters, and you’re a prime example of why. Step away and get a real life.

  • to.cute.4.u

    dont be mad or dont be jelious hater on the loose

  • to.cute.4.u

    get life and stop slacking

  • Anonymous

    I have a real life kid. And I don’t want Rob, lol!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Nope, most of the time he brings up being English out of nowhere. Can you show me interviews pre-July where he used English so much? Just curious.

    You are the one twisting his words and meaning in your second paragraph.

  • Anonymous

    hey, concerned: what on earth are you talking about. your comments lack sense. chelcp isnt trying to be kristen’s friend nor is she after Rob. if you think that way maybe its something you want for yourself. fat chance for you. I’d hate to think of what other garbage is floating around in your head so take your own advice and get a life.

  • Anonymous

    Which one of you gals is the hater?

  • Anonymous

    @Concerned. That isnt a nice comment to write so why dont you try again.

  • Anonymous

    It sure do looks to me like the sharks are circling. Chillax.

  • Lism259

    Yes they did, and unfortunately, that is what ruined the whole illusion. I can understand hoow fans of the story want so desperately to see it played out on the big screen, but will always stand by my first impression of that poorly directed, poorly acted and seriously just god aweful first movie. It is such a shame that it could have been so much better (they have gotten better over time thanks to getting rid of the first terrible director) but unfortunat ely we are stuck with these human faces of Rob and Kristen. I honestly think they should have scrapped the first movie, realized what a joke it was and had recast with actors who have actual talent. They did it with Victorias charachter. Oh well I geuss I like acting talent and good movies over the drivel that has been shoved down our throats these past couple of years. Stephanie Myer had a good thing going then she sold out. Just follow how rediculous and far fetched and anticlimatic the books turned out to be. What a shame.

  • Jalissa

    Before anyone get ready to lynch me or call me a nonsten or some crap like that I am not.I am simply a person who observes and has an opinion.If they are a couple great if not so be it.They have chemistry no denying that but what I find suspect is most of their confirmations come at a time when they movie are ready to premiere or in the works as if to keep them or it relevant.True their have been sighting of them and as private as they try to keep things their seems to always be a camera some where like they have 24 hour detail.Most of the sightings come at close to,same time or when a movie is playing.I am not with them so I don’t know I am just saying.I wish all the actors the best but I can see why some people still have doubts.Look at the facts Robsten have tried to keep this covered more a long time because they want their privacy,but then drop a little PDA here and there which they have to know wouuld start the rumor mills.Then you have have people including KS confirming and dropping hints here and there which they also know will start people talking.We know how private she is and she has said she wants to keeep some things to and for herself and she is a very smart girl.This and all the other behavior would leave people to question if their ulterior motives behind all of this and question if it is real or just more smoke and mirrors.Again I am not say they are not a couple I am just saying it is best not to speculate one way or the other because all these people are paid liars(I don’t mean that in a bad way I just mean they get paid for fantasy).It is like the old saying believe only half of what you see and none of what you hear.I think now that the series is winding down alot of shockers are going to come out and to both sides don’t be suprised if what you thought was true turns out to be false.Nikki Reed’s article coming out in Seventeen(may have the magazine wrong) seems to be telling even if she isn’t gong into details and I think this is just going to be the first of many as the twilight series comes to a close.The real series might be just beginning!

  • Confused

    so wait they are not dating? either way they look like a destructive couple she looks like she is controlling and he looks like he just wants a calm relationship……. they are so confusing…. either way i haven’t seen any of the movies…….

  • Guest

    What about the interview at the BD premiere yesterday with Rob on the insider I believe. And the man says “Can we say that is your girl? Can we just say that now?” Rob shakes his head ‘no’. The reporter then says. “No? We can’t!” Rob continues to shake his head ‘No’ The reporter goes on to ask “Why?”
    Rob then replies “It’s just ridiculous!”

  • CTgirl

    Who cares. This doesn’t impact the life of anyone here one way or the other.

  • Anonymous

    thats a very interesting point you made. the guy from the insider is a gossip reporter and maybe rob was giving him a hard time. rob is a funny guy, sometimes he is serious and at other times if he doesnt want to answer a question then he just wont. anyone else being interviewed would at least try. ann curry is someone you wouldnt be flippant with or trifle with. I know it sounds lame, but you tell me why he didnt correct ms. curry.

  • Anonymous

    Kristen denied dating Robert you mean recently. So what was the english boyfriend about? In fact what was this whole thing about. Who has been lying.

  • Robsessed1986

    Kristen did an interview the week before the BD premiere when she was in LA in which she stated that she, Rob, and Taylor are “JUST very, very, very good friends.” The English boyfriend statement happened this past summer and the magazine was released for sale in October. I realize that Rob is English, but her statement is pretty vague and to say it is fact that she was speaking of Rob is just speculation (some have said). @ French Flies had posted the main part of the interview (copy & paste) and Gossip Cop removed it, they also removed one link to that same interview apparently. Usually GC only removes the link (not every link posted however), but they removed the entire comment moments after I saw it and went to that website and read the whole interview for myself. Take it as you will.

  • Nottellingyou

    They aren’t even together! You need to get a grip on reality and stop believing what you only wish to be true.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FGWMVYECFUKPQHR4PA4NKT6VA4 Ali Gould

    You take up to 2 weeks off of work. Ya, celebrities can do it to.

  • Anonymous

    see the pictures of ur stars and celebrities on http://www.chiliwood.blogspot.com

  • Printzeshyk_tha_mumoasa

    i don’t know…they’re perfect…i mean,they’re one for each other like no others in this world…however…if they want to break up it’s not my problem.Kristen isn’t beautiful enough for robert…he’s fantastic,but they look pretty together and that’s what really matter,not to face or the hair or other things like those …;)

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities
X