comScore
  1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Busting bad dish!

Will & Kate “Baby Heartbreak” Story Stoops Low

Truth rating: 1

(In Touch)

That was fast.

Less than a month after Kate Middleton and Prince William became the new Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, tabloids have ended their own “honeymoon” with the newlywed couple.

In Touch returns to tasteless speculation this week, with a cover story blaring about “Will & Kate’s Baby Heartbreak.”

A “royal doctor confirms” the Duchess “can’t get pregnant,” declares the tabloid, advertising an article with the headline “William & Kate’s Baby Dreams Shattered.”

Except all of this In Touch blather is based on nothing.

The strongest bit of the giant feature is an anonymous “royal source” repeating alleged concerns passed along by Camilla, William’s stepmother.

Supposedly, Camilla told a friend that “health complications from Kate’s adolescence raised red flags that may have an impact on her ability to conceive,” leading to family worries that the Duchess “may not produce an heir.”

She supposedly “took fertility tests shortly before the engagement,” claims a different “royal insider” for the magazine – although we never learn the results of those alleged tests.

Wait a minute.

The cover claims to have medical confirmation that the Duchess “can’t get pregnant.”

It announces “devastating news” that has supposedly rocked her marriage.

Except the story offers NO such confirmation, and there’s been NO “news” of any kind.

The article is larded with language about “potential” problems and hypothetical setbacks… but absolutely no actual reason to believe there’s been “baby heartbreak.”

In fact, much of the story is taken up with discussion of how wonderful it is that William and Middleton married for love rather than “duty,” speculating that theirs could be a happier and more stable union than William’s parents’.

In other words, because the newlyweds love each other so much, and because there’s no readily apparent controversy, In Touch is forced to spin a non-story – the fact that Catherine’s not already pregnant – into controversy, inventing this embellished “baby heartbreak.”

It’s a desperate rumor that deserves to be (royally) flushed.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

You might like:


  • Kim

    I agree…shame on them….leave the Duke and Duchess alone…

  • Brianna

    This article is disgusting
    1. Haven’t you bothered William enough?? The press caused him enough REAL heartbreak is it necessary to invent any more?? (Anyone remember Diana or is or memory to short to realize that it is the same corrupt industry?)
    2. This article is misleading- upon reading the headline people will likely believe they suffered a miscarriage
    3. Considering 2 of my family members have lost children (one had a child live only 8 hours and one suffered a miscarriage in week 13) I find this deeply insulting on a personal level to make a mockery of a real situation that causes real people pain to make a quick buck. (Again we should have learned this lesson after killing his mother)
    Overall this piece of shit tabloid is just disgusting, immoral, and pure evil and I am disgusted by the human race when I see what they would do to this happy young couple when they are finally finding joy after everything poor Wills has been through
    Thank you gossip cop for clearing this up and hopefully stopping this despicable rumor in its tracks!!

  • The_dedicated_onanist

    But Brianna, have you ever bought any of these sensationalist magazines?

  • Linda

    What a shame, I feel so sorry for them to have to read this garbage. These gossip magazines are disgusting, hurtfull and nothing but a bunch of bulls….t and I refuse to buy them and have not for a very long time. I don’t understand how they can make up such hurtfull stories about people and get away with it, while the people they are destroying are suffering. It makes me so angry that there is no way to stop this. Maybe if we all ban together and never buy the garbage maybe someday it will end. My heart goes out to this beautiful couple and I wish them only the best.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Luna-Petunia/100000789652822 Luna Petunia

    oh PLEASE!!!!!! there would have been NO MARRIAGE IF SHE COULD NOT REPRODUCE!!! She HAD TO GO THROUGH ALL SORTS OF STUPID TESTS FOR THE CROWN!!! There is No Way Great Britain ROYALTY would Let this Highly Expensive Marriage GO THROUGH

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Luna-Petunia/100000789652822 Luna Petunia

    and expect to hear a ROYAL ANNOUCEMENT OF HER PREGNANCY IN A FEW MONTHS, NOT IN ‘IN TOUCH’ NOT IN ‘THE ENQUIRER’ NOT IN ‘THE STAR’. … Maybe she will not get pregnant as fast as Diana, which was in a few months……but, since she is in her late 20s, it will be soon…… but maybe they will wait until he is out of what ever service he is in and can be back in London instead of that Island he is on in Wales…. WHO REALLY KNOWS, OTHER THEN……. THEM?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Luna-Petunia/100000789652822 Luna Petunia

    oh, I forgot again, In touch, the Star, the Enquirer, etc. seem to know, before these WOMEM KNOW, now a days….. ESP? Maybe? They, these rags, seem smarter or so they thing they are

  • http://whatchareading-kl.blogspot.com/ KL☼ BD1♂Csmpls♦BD2♀Ami♣

    Wow, magazines really have nothing better to do than print CRAP like this, do they??? Plus, I’m sure The Royal Family would have made her find out before handing their Prince off for nothing…

  • Anonymous

    I agree with Luna . . . no matter how much William loved Kate, there is no way they would have been allowed to marry if there was any chance at all that she couldn’t get pregnant. Trust! This woman is fertile and will reproduce at least two children. And, since Kate will be 30 early next year, I’m betting she is pregnant before Christmas.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with Luna . . . no matter how much William loved Kate, there is no way they would have been allowed to marry if there was any chance at all that she couldn’t get pregnant. Trust! This woman is fertile and will reproduce at least two children. And, since Kate will be 30 early next year, I’m betting she is pregnant before Christmas.

  • Brianna

    No, actually I haven’t

  • Sploogy

    Why are people so stupid like she is fine they are just being stupid people who are stupid and they are going to ruin their lives like they did Diana’s. The legit suck and I think they should get in a lot of trouble for writing this. The queen couldn’t have let them get married is Kate couldn’t produce an heir to the throne no matter how in love they are. I bet that kate is already pregnant

  • Anonymous

    vipshopper.us

  • echo

    oh for goodness sakes, can’t the press just let them be? they already took away his mother, let’s not take away his wife now too.

  • echo

    oh for goodness sakes, can’t the press just let them be? they already took away his mother, let’s not take away his wife now too.

  • http://www.facebook.com/VaranSD Paul Fuller

    Vote at the checkout. Stop buying magazines like this.

  • Anonymous

    LOL She does not have to read Out Of Touch or any tabloid to figure out this is all bs. LOL Cause it actually is.

  • Anonymous

    LOL She does not have to read Out Of Touch or any tabloid to figure out this is all bs. LOL Cause it actually is.

  • Tupackacoors

    it not so sad that the kate wont be able to have no more kids. eight of them monsters running round be way nuff. she not need so many them brats.

  • Guest

    I hate it when tabloids lie! They’ll do anything, including ruin a person’s life, just to get a “good story.” They never have proof, they just have speculations. I never thought that Kate couldn’t have kids and I’m glad she can. Plus, that’s not really anyone’s business. Tabloids should just leave them alone!

  • Anonymous

    People should boycott these rags. They just went away for 10 days,…absolutely discusting!!! They should sue!

  • Kiki_anita

    Gosh how do these tabloid publishers go to bed at night? Do they sleep at all or just whatever dreams they have they just publish em the following morning and call that a source…..too desperate i say…Nkest

  • http://twitter.com/dsrwade23 Dominic Wade

    I think you’re making the same error you made with a previous story regarding the Duchess of Cambridge being “pregnant”.

  • http://twitter.com/dsrwade23 Dominic Wade

    It is the same old story of the gutter press making up stories to make more money. The only problem for them is that these stories are absolute fantasy. The Duchess of Cornwall would never tell these gossip magazines such private information, so the magazine is running close to being done for libel regarding this story.

  • Ashley

    Their friends and family are discreet, like most of our friends and family. Nobody has ever gone to any news source to reveal such personal information. No reputable doctor would ever discuss a patients medical condition with anyone. These magazines are beyond trash, and people who read them are very gullible.
    How many times has poor Jennifer Aniston been pregnant and in the process of adopting. She went on a TV show because someone bought it up, she claimed she doesn’t look at these kinds of mags. She said that she is not pining for Brad, not pregnant, not adopting, and not alone.

    I am surprised these magazines actually sell.

  • lovemenot

    So VERY VERY true,,I said the exact thing,,come on people smartin up….

  • Faithubirih

    Why is it that people never mind their own business?Who read these magazines? As far as l’m concerned they are not God and their wish for the new couple to suffer heartbreak will never come to pass.

  • http://twitter.com/heloiseheloise heloise heloise

    Being fertile is no guarantee of being able to carry a healthy child to term, just ask all the women out there who don’t have anything obviously wrong with them but for unexplained reasons suffer miscarriage after miscarriage. I really doubt in 2011, when the Royal Family are nothing but symbolic figureheads in the UK and not anything to do with actually governing the country, that they care so much about such things and if they do then it’s just one more reason why the Royal Family are completely irrelevant.

  • http://twitter.com/heloiseheloise heloise heloise

    Being fertile is no guarantee of being able to carry a healthy child to term, just ask all the women out there who don’t have anything obviously wrong with them but for unexplained reasons suffer miscarriage after miscarriage. I really doubt in 2011, when the Royal Family are nothing but symbolic figureheads in the UK and not anything to do with actually governing the country, that they care so much about such things and if they do then it’s just one more reason why the Royal Family are completely irrelevant.

  • Tupackacoors

    domino you have the gay. how you know all thig girly stuff noway lessen you have the gay.

  • Tupackacoors

    domino you have the gay. how you know all thig girly stuff noway lessen you have the gay.

  • Hclement123

    We adopted and have 4 georheous grandchildren and we love just as much as if they were born to us

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DCJ63EGSLML7KL6VN64CFC5H4U happy year

    we wish will and kate the best

  • Asha

    Of course a “close source” tells these “magazines” these things. Just because Kate is 29 doesn’t mean that she can’t have kids! She and Wills will probably announce her pregnancy within a year anyway, so cool it! And anyway, there’s always Harry just in case…

  • Princessj824

    The two haven’t even been married for a year and already people are expecting them to have a baby. They’re young. And yes they may have responsibilities but they’re just starting out. The fact that they married for love and not out of duty is very romantic. They’re obviously taking their time so let them. It’s between the two of them wheather or not they want a baby. Give them time is what I say.

  • Nodough1

    whos business is it anyway if and when this young couple decides to have children. . these so called ” news ” paper-reporters and the editors are plainly incabable of finding any real news so lets all jump on the young couple. shame shame and double shame. heidi

  • Haasecarolina

    honestly…I don’t think the Queen approved this marriage and take no care about this huge importance topic before the event…
    I think Kate is OK…and she will pop the new soon.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Amira-Goli/100002398798422 Amira Goli

    Leave them alone!! let them live their lives! Prince William has suffered enough already..loosing his beautiful mother may she rest in peace..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Amira-Goli/100002398798422 Amira Goli

    Will & Kate “Baby Heartbreak” Story Stoops Low
    Truth rating: 1

    Duchess of Cambridge Duke of Cambridge Kate Middleton Prince William

    7:27 pm, May 19th, 2011

    (In Touch)

    That was fast.

    Less than a month after Kate Middleton and Prince William became the new Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, tabloids have ended their own “honeymoon” with the newlywed couple.

    In Touch returns to tasteless speculation this week, with a cover story blaring about “Will & Kate’s Baby Heartbreak.”

    A “royal doctor confirms” the Duchess “can’t get pregnant,” declares the tabloid, advertising an article with the headline “William & Kate’s Baby Dreams Shattered.”

    Except all of this In Touch blather is based on nothing.

    The strongest bit of the giant feature is an anonymous “royal source” repeating alleged concerns passed along by Camilla, William’s stepmother.

    Supposedly, Camilla told a friend that “health complications from Kate’s adolescence raised red flags that may have an impact on her ability to conceive,” leading to family worries that the Duchess “may not produce an heir.”

    She supposedly “took fertility tests shortly before the engagement,” claims a different “royal insider” for the magazine – although we never learn the results of those alleged tests.

    Wait a minute.

    The cover claims to have medical confirmation that the Duchess “can’t get pregnant.”

    It announces “devastating news” that has supposedly rocked her marriage.

    Except the story offers NO such confirmation, and there’s been NO “news” of any kind.

    The article is larded with language about “potential” problems and hypothetical setbacks… but absolutely no actual reason to believe there’s been “baby heartbreak.”

    In fact, much of the story is taken up with discussion of how wonderful it is that William and Middleton married for love rather than “duty,” speculating that theirs could be a happier and more stable union than William’s parents’.

    In other words, because the newlyweds love each other so much, and because there’s no readily apparent controversy, In Touch is forced to spin a non-story – the fact that Catherine’s not already pregnant – into controversy, inventing this embellished “baby heartbreak.”

    It’s a desperate rumor that deserves to be (royally) flushed.

    Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

    Like us on Facebook!

    Sign up for Gossip Cop’s daily newsletter.
    You might like:
    MAG: Kate Middleton is “Pregnant with TWINS!”
    MAG: Kate Middleton is “Pregnant with TWINS!” (Gossip Cop)
    CLAIM: Kate Middleton is a “Pregnant Bride!”
    CLAIM: Kate Middleton is a “Pregnant Bride!” (Gossip Cop)
    Did Miley Cyrus Take a Naked Photo of Herself on her iPhone?
    Did Miley Cyrus Take a Naked Photo of Herself on her iPhone? (Gossip Cop)
    Angelina Jolie 93 Pounds – Addicted Hoodia Diet Pills | Gossip Cop
    Angelina Jolie 93 Pounds – Addicted Hoodia Diet Pills | Gossip Cop (Gossip Cop)
    Where to Shop for a Cute Sequin Dress
    Paid Distribution
    Where to Shop for a Cute Sequin Dress (Beauty and Style)
    Where to Shop for a Cute Sequin Dress
    Angelina Jolie 93 Pounds – Addicted Hoodia Diet Pills | Gossip Cop
    Did Miley Cyrus Take a Naked Photo of Herself on her iPhone?
    CLAIM: Kate Middleton is a “Pregnant Bride!”
    MAG: Kate Middleton is “Pregnant with TWINS!”

    0
    Disqus

    Like
    Dislike
    2 people liked this.

    Showing 32 of 33 comments
    Sort by Subscribe by email Subscribe by RSS

    Kim 5 months ago
    I agree…shame on them….leave the Duke and Duchess alone…
    Heather and 15 more liked this

    Brianna 5 months ago
    This article is disgusting
    1. Haven’t you bothered William enough?? The press caused him enough REAL heartbreak is it necessary to invent any more?? (Anyone remember Diana or is or memory to short to realize that it is the same corrupt industry?)
    2. This article is misleading- upon reading the headline people will likely believe they suffered a miscarriage
    3. Considering 2 of my family members have lost children (one had a child live only 8 hours and one suffered a miscarriage in week 13) I find this deeply insulting on a personal level to make a mockery of a real situation that causes real people pain to make a quick buck. (Again we should have learned this lesson after killing his mother)
    Overall this piece of shit tabloid is just disgusting, immoral, and pure evil and I am disgusted by the human race when I see what they would do to this happy young couple when they are finally finding joy after everything poor Wills has been through
    Thank you gossip cop for clearing this up and hopefully stopping this despicable rumor in its tracks!!
    Heather and 29 more liked this

    The_dedicated_onanist 5 months ago
    But Brianna, have you ever bought any of these sensationalist magazines?
    2 people liked this.

    Brianna 4 months ago in reply to The_dedicated_onanist
    No, actually I haven’t
    Heather and 5 more liked this

    JoeJonasGirl0676 4 months ago in reply to Brianna
    LOL She does not have to read Out Of Touch or any tabloid to figure out this is all bs. LOL Cause it actually is.
    Heather and 2 more liked this

    Linda 5 months ago
    What a shame, I feel so sorry for them to have to read this garbage. These gossip magazines are disgusting, hurtfull and nothing but a bunch of bulls….t and I refuse to buy them and have not for a very long time. I don’t understand how they can make up such hurtfull stories about people and get away with it, while the people they are destroying are suffering. It makes me so angry that there is no way to stop this. Maybe if we all ban together and never buy the garbage maybe someday it will end. My heart goes out to this beautiful couple and I wish them only the best.
    14 people liked this.

    Luna Petunia 5 months ago
    oh PLEASE!!!!!! there would have been NO MARRIAGE IF SHE COULD NOT REPRODUCE!!! I am SURE, KATHERINE UNDER WENT ALL SORTS OF ENDLESS MEDICAL TESTS to see if she could if she could reproduce, bear children for the CROWN! If not, there would have not been that ridiculous highly expensive Great Britain Wedding, IF SHE WEAR NOT ABLE TO REPRODUCE!!! The Queen simple would NOT ALLOW IT!!!! No Bank Holiday! No Royal Bands! No use of the Catherdal! No use of the ROYAL CARRIAGE!!!!! etc. etc. etc.
    Heather and 11 more liked this

    lovemenot 4 months ago in reply to Luna Petunia
    So VERY VERY true,,I said the exact thing,,come on people smartin up….
    2 people liked this.

    Luna Petunia 5 months ago
    and expect to hear a ROYAL ANNOUCEMENT OF HER PREGNANCY IN A FEW MONTHS, NOT IN ‘IN TOUCH’ NOT IN ‘THE ENQUIRER’ NOT IN ‘THE STAR’. … Maybe she will not get pregnant as fast as Diana, which was in a few months……but, since she is in her late 20s, it will be soon…… but maybe they will wait until he is out of what ever service he is in and can be back in London instead of that Island he is on in Wales…. WHO REALLY KNOWS, OTHER THEN……. THEM?
    4 people liked this.

    Luna Petunia 5 months ago in reply to Luna Petunia
    oh, I forgot again, In touch, the Star, the Enquirer, etc. seem to know, before these WOMEM KNOW, now a days….. ESP? Maybe? They, these rags, seem smarter or so they thing they are
    2 people liked this.

    KL☼ BD1♂ Csmpls♦ Ami? BD2♀ 5 months ago
    Wow, magazines really have nothing better to do than print CRAP like this, do they??? Plus, I’m sure The Royal Family would have made her find out before handing their Prince off for nothing…
    2 people liked this.

    mslewis 4 months ago
    I agree with Luna . . . no matter how much William loved Kate, there is no way they would have been allowed to marry if there was any chance at all that she couldn’t get pregnant. Trust! This woman is fertile and will reproduce at least two children. And, since Kate will be 30 early next year, I’m betting she is pregnant before Christmas.
    Heather and 8 more liked this

    heloise heloise 4 months ago in reply to mslewis
    Being fertile is no guarantee of being able to carry a healthy child to term, just ask all the women out there who don’t have anything obviously wrong with them but for unexplained reasons suffer miscarriage after miscarriage. I really doubt in 2011, when the Royal Family are nothing but symbolic figureheads in the UK and not anything to do with actually governing the country, that they care so much about such things and if they do then it’s just one more reason why the Royal Family are completely irrelevant.
    3 people liked this.

    Sploogy 4 months ago
    Why are people so stupid like she is fine they are just being stupid people who are stupid and they are going to ruin their lives like they did Diana’s. The legit suck and I think they should get in a lot of trouble for writing this. The queen couldn’t have let them get married is Kate couldn’t produce an heir to the throne no matter how in love they are. I bet that kate is already pregnant
    4 people liked this.

    cvcfd 4 months ago
    vipshopper.us

    echo 4 months ago
    oh for goodness sakes, can’t the press just let them be? they already took away his mother, let’s not take away his wife now too.
    Heather and 5 more liked this

    Paul Fuller 4 months ago
    Vote at the checkout. Stop buying magazines like this.
    Heather and 4 more liked this

    Guest 4 months ago in reply to Paul Fuller
    Comment removed.

    Dominic Wade 4 months ago in reply to Guest
    I think you’re making the same error you made with a previous story regarding the Duchess of Cambridge being “pregnant”.

    Guest 4 months ago
    I hate it when tabloids lie! They’ll do anything, including ruin a person’s life, just to get a “good story.” They never have proof, they just have speculations. I never thought that Kate couldn’t have kids and I’m glad she can. Plus, that’s not really anyone’s business. Tabloids should just leave them alone!

    Lindy12206 4 months ago
    People should boycott these rags. They just went away for 10 days,…absolutely discusting!!! They should sue!
    Heather and 3 more liked this

    Kiki_anita 4 months ago
    Gosh how do these tabloid publishers go to bed at night? Do they sleep at all or just whatever dreams they have they just publish em the following morning and call that a source…..too desperate i say…Nkest
    2 people liked this.

    Dominic Wade 4 months ago
    It is the same old story of the gutter press making up stories to make more money. The only problem for them is that these stories are absolute fantasy. The Duchess of Cornwall would never tell these gossip magazines such private information, so the magazine is running close to being done for libel regarding this story.

    Ashley 4 months ago
    Their friends and family are discreet, like most of our friends and family. Nobody has ever gone to any news source to reveal such personal information. No reputable doctor would ever discuss a patients medical condition with anyone. These magazines are beyond trash, and people who read them are very gullible.
    How many times has poor Jennifer Aniston been pregnant and in the process of adopting. She went on a TV show because someone bought it up, she claimed she doesn’t look at these kinds of mags. She said that she is not pining for Brad, not pregnant, not adopting, and not alone.

    I am surprised these magazines actually sell.
    1 person liked this.

    hhlk9 4 months ago
    tinyurl.com/2a7usxg

    Faithubirih 4 months ago
    Why is it that people never mind their own business?Who read these magazines? As far as l’m concerned they are not God and their wish for the new couple to suffer heartbreak will never come to pass.

    Hclement123 3 months ago
    We adopted and have 4 georheous grandchildren and we love just as much as if they were born to us

    happy year 3 months ago
    we wish will and kate the best
    1 person liked this.

    Asha 2 months ago
    Of course a “close source” tells these “magazines” these things. Just because Kate is 29 doesn’t mean that she can’t have kids! She and Wills will probably announce her pregnancy within a year anyway, so cool it! And anyway, there’s always Harry just in case…
    1 person liked this.

    Princessj824 2 months ago
    The two haven’t even been married for a year and already people are expecting them to have a baby. They’re young. And yes they may have responsibilities but they’re just starting out. The fact that they married for love and not out of duty is very romantic. They’re obviously taking their time so let them. It’s between the two of them wheather or not they want a baby. Give them time is what I say.

    Nodough1 1 month ago
    whos business is it anyway if and when this young couple decides to have children. . these so called ” news ” paper-reporters and the editors are plainly incabable of finding any real news so lets all jump on the young couple. shame shame and double shame. heidi

    Haasecarolina 1 month ago
    honestly…I don’t think the Queen approved this marriage and take no care about this huge importance topic before the event…
    I think Kate is OK…and she will pop the new soon.
    1 person liked this.

    Amira Goli 0 minutes ago
    Leave them alone!! let them live their lives! Prince William has suffered enough already..loosing his beautiful mother may she rest in peace..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Amira-Goli/100002398798422 Amira Goli

    Will & Kate “Baby Heartbreak” Story Stoops Low
    Truth rating: 1

    Duchess of Cambridge Duke of Cambridge Kate Middleton Prince William

    That was fast.

    Less than a month after Kate Middleton and Prince William became the new Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, tabloids have ended their own “honeymoon” with the newlywed couple.

    In Touch returns to tasteless speculation this week, with a cover story blaring about “Will & Kate’s Baby Heartbreak.”

    A “royal doctor confirms” the Duchess “can’t get pregnant,” declares the tabloid, advertising an article with the headline “William & Kate’s Baby Dreams Shattered.”

    Except all of this In Touch blather is based on nothing.

    The strongest bit of the giant feature is an anonymous “royal source” repeating alleged concerns passed along by Camilla, William’s stepmother.

    Supposedly, Camilla told a friend that “health complications from Kate’s adolescence raised red flags that may have an impact on her ability to conceive,” leading to family worries that the Duchess “may not produce an heir.”

    She supposedly “took fertility tests shortly before the engagement,” claims a different “royal insider” for the magazine – although we never learn the results of those alleged tests.

    Wait a minute.

    The cover claims to have medical confirmation that the Duchess “can’t get pregnant.”

    It announces “devastating news” that has supposedly rocked her marriage.

    Except the story offers NO such confirmation, and there’s been NO “news” of any kind.

    The article is larded with language about “potential” problems and hypothetical setbacks… but absolutely no actual reason to believe there’s been “baby heartbreak.”

    In fact, much of the story is taken up with discussion of how wonderful it is that William and Middleton married for love rather than “duty,” speculating that theirs could be a happier and more stable union than William’s parents’.

    In other words, because the newlyweds love each other so much, and because there’s no readily apparent controversy, In Touch is forced to spin a non-story – the fact that Catherine’s not already pregnant – into controversy, inventing this embellished “baby heartbreak.”

    It’s a desperate rumor that deserves to be (royally) flushed.

    Amira Goli 0 minutes ago
    Leave them alone!! let them live their lives! Prince William has suffered enough already..loosing his beautiful mother may she rest in peace..inshaAllah

  • Frieda Mweneni Immanuel

    I believe in God. I believe there is no situation that God cannot intervene, Kate and Will are believer hence in so doing they must know that God who created them can make things easier for them. Visible wonders and signs are been performed in the house of the Lord, Go to Nigeria! the SCOAN have a permanent solution to your problem… Why wait? There is no part that is not in the workshop of our GOD ALMIGHTY…..In Jesus name, Amen.

  • Victor

    The Lady is no longer Kate Middleton, she is a married woman: Her Royal Highness Princess William of Wales, or Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge or Mrs William Windsor. She is no longer a single woman with a “maiden name”. If you can’t grasp this you need help. I don’t know why they even let you write anything.

  • Drew

    If she could not have a child it would really not be a big concern for the throne; if William dies without heirs, the crown would pass through his brother’s family.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/EBMKSXZIGUFTVL4E2FQQBGG4MA Mary

    Everyone assumes that if there is no royal heir it would be Kate’s problem. What if William might be the problem. Has he been examined? Just a thought.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/EBMKSXZIGUFTVL4E2FQQBGG4MA Mary

    That would be a real bummer but an heir would be guaranteed by another of the royals.

  • Siobhan Beckett

    I bet we all know who started this story in order to make Kate look bad in front of the royal family once again- her initials are D.O.C. If she looks like a horse and smells like a horse, and acts like one to, than in all probability she is most likely to be full of sh*t. God only knows that a face like her could only be formed from a horse’s a*s!!
    I am glad to hear that the tabloids a least got one part of this royal story right-The duchess of horsesh*t will never become queen. She has caused nothing but trouble for Kate since day 1. And hasn’t stop since. She ruined Chuck’s marriage to Diana, now she’s trying to do the same for Will and Kate. I hope the Queen kicks her out onto the cold cobblestone onto her blueblooded backside after her jubilee. Boyles is nothing but a blueblodded hore, that derserves to be shoveling horsesh*t for a living. She doesn’t even have the grace or diginity to be a Gentlewoman of the Privy!!

  • Lindy

    I take it someone does not like Camilla’s snobby, blueblooded, arrogant behaviour at all. Her superiority complex and the way she is constantly putting Kate down as a commoner is quite a low and mean sprited thing to do. Not worthy of any woman who would want to be the Queen of England. I agree that Camilla lacks any true grace or dignity that would be part of this title. Her arrogance and self-centered snobbish attitudes is no place for a leader of a country or her consort. A leader of a country must be the epitomy of everything that shows the true and best nature of her people and culture. A true leader must also be able to understand the needs of their people and be willing to help them, not look down at them with contempt because they are not as rich and powerful as she is, and stamp on them in their hour of need instead of helping them. Camilla is not ready to be queen, nor do many people think that she will ever be ready for this. For Kate and Will Winsdor, aka the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge-when they are ready to have children, they will. With the help of God and science they will have children.

  • lindy

    What is a Gentlewoman of the Privy?

  • siobhan beckett

    A Gentlewoman of the Privy was an old-fashioned name for the castle employee who was charged with the 24/7 duty of making sure that the lady of the manner always had someone to assist her when she needed to use the chamberpot or whatever other places they had for those types of activities. In other words an 18th century version of an A*S wiper me laddy!!

  • TINKERBELL80

    WHAT THE HELL IS IT TO ANYBODY IF THEY HAVE A BABY OR NOT WILL AND KATE ARE PEPOLE WHO ARE TRYING TO HAVE A LIFE JUST LIKE ANY BODY WHO IS MARRIED AND IF CHARLES AND CAMILE ARE TRYING TO KILL THAT BY SPREADING LIES THEN THEY ARE A**#**E’S JUST BECAUSE THEY WANT WHAT WILL AND KATE HAVE SO JUST LET THEM LIVE IN THERE OWEN WORLD AND WE NEED TO WORRY BOUT OUR OWN LIVES

  • Karma

    This is just retribution as apparently Kate Middleton savagely mistreated a Lady in London when fighting for wills. Karma is a bitch. well deserved

  • MARIA G.

    ¡YO NO VEO NINGUN PROBLEMA SI ELLOS NO TIENEN HIJOS ESTA HARRY.!

  • ANNIE

    It would be a BLESSING if that slut can’t have a baby and I hope he
    divorces her. She is such TRASH. There is a nude photo of her if you
    look enough you will find it online. She has had numerous drunken photos
    taken…and photos of the dumb bimbo in the back of cars without any
    underwear. She’s STUPID. She’s COMMON, she is not good enough to be
    William’s wife. Princess Diana would not have allowed this marriage,
    kate and her sleazy personality would not have been approved. Look on
    YouTube for video called “Kate Middleton-Party Princess”. She’s a
    freaking,empty fool.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002556780615 Suzanne Ennazus

    Maybe if people didn’t buy celeb magazines full of drivel and idiots, then they wouldn’t bother writing things like this.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jen.green.5680899 Jen Green

    Well she did get pregnant but it was only because they visited a fertility clinic.

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities
X