comScore
  1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Busting bad dish!

Hot Topics Jennifer Lawrence Kim Kardashian Rihanna Robert Pattinson Beyonce Justin Bieber Kristen Stewart

Did Jessica Simpson Have “Dramatic Delivery”?

Truth rating: 0

12:11 pm, April 18th, 2012

(In Touch)

And we’d thought we’d already seen the worst one of these.

Following OK! magazine’s completely fake cover story pretending Jessica Simpson had already given birth comes an In Touch cover story trying to trick readers into thinking the tabloid has details about her “dramatic delivery.”

The story promises specifics about her “cold sweats” and “tearful first words to her baby girl,” all of which is designed to convey the totally bogus idea that Simpson already delivered her daughter.

She has not.

Simpson has not given birth.

In Touch knows this, which is why the lame story accompanying the bait-and-switch cover is just a bunch of filler and speculation pertaining to what might happen with her delivery.

For instance, those “tearful first words” to her baby actually refers to what In Touch claims Simpson has said to her baby girl in the womb.

The tabloid is trying to look like it has the big, dramatic scoop from inside the delivery room.

But as is often the case, In Touch just wasted everyone’s time.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

You might like:


  • Realchic

    Thanks COP.. Knew it thanks for the hard work & verification.

  • Anonymous

    Duh she’s not due till friday and the press can’t leave her alone her daughter didn’t ask to be born of a famus mother only one that loves her. Jessica didn’t chose to have a c section for vanity reasons it’s medically neccessary because she’s carying excess amniotic fluid

  • Regina1180

    I would imagine that even the smoothest delivery would be “dramatic”.

  • Guest

    Get on the Toms daughter living on skid row story. Lol Wth?

  • Guest22

    Sorry, this is fiction writing at its best. Telling the public “all the details” about something that has not happened yet is beyond belief, but somehow typical of this silly rag.

    I am sure the Angelina/Brad story is just as silly. They will no doubt have access to all those “insiders” that somehow were struck dumb (meaning without speech) and failed to tell them about the engagement last week.

  • Anonymous

    @Regina not really and tabloids do this kind of stuff all the time. weather it’s with a celeb who’s about to give birth or a marriage they’re Jealous of and want to end in divorce ask Joanne Woodward the tabloids did it to her & Paul Newman to the point where they took out a half page ad in the Hollywood Reporter denying it

  • Libra227

    Here’s a thought… maybe if you stop buying these stupid magazines maybe just maybe the news/media/tabloids, etc will get the message and print only what is true. Then again, I guess you all like reading about other people’s lifes and their problems. Maybe you should focus on your own life.

  • Anonymous

    what Peter implied I am inspired that anybody can earn $9867 in 1 month on the internet. have you seen this web page>>> http://hireworker.wordpress.com/

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/AEUAZYWY7P2BNXDBOSCWNDUZFM Vicky

    what Kenneth answered I cant believe that a mother able to earn $6080 in 4 weeks on the internet. did you see this web site !!! http://Gotoonlinejob.blogspot.in

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities
X