1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Busting bad dish!

Casey Anthony Juror: “We Were Sick to Our Stomach to Get That Verdict”

VIDEO

(ABC)

Jennifer Ford, juror #3 in the Casey Anthony trial, became the first to break her silence in the wake of yesterday’s controversial acquittal, speaking to “Nightline.”

The jury room atmosphere she describes is every bit as intense as the public’s reaction to the decision.

“We were sick to our stomach to get that verdict,” says Ford. “We were crying, and not just the women.”

“I did not say she was innocent,” the 32-year-old nursing student tells interviewer Terry Moran, explaining, ”I just said there was not enough evidence. If you cannot prove what the crime was, you cannot determine what the punishment should be.”

“I’m still confused. I have no idea what happened to that child,” says Ford.

Watch the intense video below, and tell us what you think.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

WATCH:


  • Celticbreeze21

    It is not necessary to prove motive or cause of death. These jurors are largely uneducated and couldn’t understand the complexities of this case well enough to connect the dots.

  • Dranged711

    AThis Juror is incorrect, State does not have to prove how the Murder was committed. Just that it was committed. People have been convicted without bodies of the the victims!!!

  • Omgsheislame

    Shame on her. While watching the trial it was obvious that the Defense strategy was to twist things up and confuse the jury. The dumbass jury fell for it.

  • sunnyfla

    Juror no. 3 said a bunch of BS. There was a lesser charge of manslaughter that Casey could have been convicted of.

  • Jae

    Well Juror #3, I am soooooooooo glad you listened to the EVIDENCE and followed INSTRUCTIONS…..Oh my gosh! You’ve got to be kidding me! So, you were the STEALTH juror that wanted to be on the jury. You live with your decision for the rest of your life and have the death of a 2-1/2 year old innocent child on your conscience! You know Casey Anthony showed no mercy to Caylee, but you will sit and decide with all the EVIDENCE and all the INSTRUCTIONS of YOUR civic responsibility and treat this case with such IGNORANCE and then say OOPS! Too late, you set a child murderer free! YOU live with that!

  • Jae

    YOU DON’T NEED CAUSE OF DEATH TO CONVICT OF MURDER, YOU IDIOT! HOW COME EVERYONE IN AMERICA PAID ATTENTION TO WHAT YOUR JOB WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AND YOU COULDN’T FOLLOW THE LAW. DID YOU EVEN PAY ATTENTION FOR 8 WEEKS. YOU CLEARLY DID NOT FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE COURT, ACCORDING TO THIS INTERVIEW. A JUROR DOESN’T MAKE UP THEIR OWN RULES. DUMB, DUMB, DUMB!

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    as as a juror, she knew the risk…the problem is when you take part as juror, you’re emotions can’t play into it…it’s why the lawyers ask you question at jury duty.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Samantha-Stiteler/1242582755 Samantha Stiteler

    What ever happened to that baby girl is absolutely horrible, but the state dropped the ball!! I agree, that they do not have to prove motive. However, how can you can a jury be expected to convict someone of 1st degree murder when the cause of death was never truly established?? The prosecution gave a theory but that cannot sway someone beyond a reasonable doubt without evidence!! The way this jury is being treated by the people of this country is absolutely horrible!! For the record, I believe that poor little girl was murdered, and I hope Casey Anthony rots in hell for what she did!

  • Ashl3yAnn

    Absolutely disgusted with her lack of intelligence, she couldn’t even comprehend the fact that there is no burden on the prosecution to prove motive…SHAME ON THEM ALL.

  • Celticbreeze21

    Cause of death vs. manner of death. One may prove the manner of death was homicide without a specific cause of death. Most people are too ignorant to distinguish between the two.

  • Bugaboold

    Well! Said ; (

  • Sheilaepperson

    You are so right, evidence was there, Juror #3, were you aspecting and Audience, that wittnessed her killing her daughter. Iam soooo upset. I have a son in Iraq fighting for this Country! And this is unspeakable. She knows what happened, I think Judge Perry should do something, Not fair, That she will walk .And she has , something is not right with her. Know one could act that way .

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Samantha-Stiteler/1242582755 Samantha Stiteler

    True! However, there was so little physical evidence, and none linking anyone in particular to the murder. I along with the rest of this country feel that this woman is guilty as hell. Fortunately for all of us, someone cannot be convicted for anything off of a feeling. Everyone wants to blame the jury for the verdict, but what was presented to show this woman killed her daughter beyond a reasonable doubt? I stand firmly behind my opinion that the prosecution fudged this one up. They were tremendously over reaching with a capital murder charge. She should have been charged with negligent homicide, the state had more than enough evidence to convict her of that!! Sadly, now they have lost their one and only chance to get justice for that baby.

  • Sheilaepperson

    I think retrial, somebody stand up.In some of the pictures Caylee had a black eye. And in some of them she looked druged. Take a look you will see.

  • Imma

    I totally agree with you! I would need hard evidence to convict someone of MURDER! Casey Anthony may be guilty but the Prosecutors did not prove it! Therefore there should be no conviction for murder. This was an emotional case and I am soo glad there jurors did not let that get in the way them of making a decision. Too many innocent people are in jail serving harsh sentences because of angry and emotional jurors. May not like the decision but it is what it is! If she did it let the Lord take care of her. Now it’s time to move on. And pleaseeee Nancy Grace find a new story!

  • Trialwatcher

    It sounds like the jury bought the defense’s opening statement and then ignored everything that disputed that statement. Opening statements are not to be considered as evidence. According to this juror’s way of thinking, as long as a murderer can keep the victim’s body hidden long enough for it to completely decompose and commit the murder when no one is watching, they are always entitled by the law to get away with it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Samantha-Stiteler/1242582755 Samantha Stiteler

    Unfortunetly, she is protected by the fifth amendment. They can not seek a retrial. The state really screwed this one up!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather

    Wow did these jurors listen to their instructions? If they were so sick to their stomachs why didn’t they ask to go over one bit of evidence? That is what a deliberation is. “I did not say she was innocent,” well then what does that make her dumb a**. “If you cannot prove what the crime was, you cannot determine what the punishment should be.” WTF she shouldn’t be considering the punishment. Was she listening to different jury instructions then me? Then she is going to draw conclusions because “George” was acting a certain way? What a joke. I hope she is haunted every night for eternity and I hope someone as ignorant as this broad doesn’t reproduce. I hope she enjoyed her trip to Disneyland,, Disgusting,

  • Jenna

    Jae maybe I missed something but I never heard her say she regrets her decision. She never said that. She made a decision based on no evidence and is clearly standing behind it. Blame the Prosecutors if you want to blame someone! They did a horrible job! I still ask today…. Prove who did it? How did they do it? What did they do? NO ANSWERS!

  • Jenna

    Jae maybe I missed something but I never heard her say she regrets her decision. She never said that. She made a decision based on no evidence and is clearly standing behind it. Blame the Prosecutors if you want to blame someone! They did a horrible job! I still ask today…. Prove who did it? How did they do it? What did they do? NO ANSWERS!

  • Tish

    Dumb B!tc#… she makes no sense.. Wtf is she talking about? ugh!

  • Bgsj

    The state did the best they could with what they had. The Jury did the best they could with what they had. The ball was dropped with law enforcement when they failed to recover Caylee’s body in August, when it was first reported by Kronk. In today’s CSI era, people want forensic evidence and that was gone by December.

  • Lskls

    That juror has a dead look in her eyes as if she’s a psycho.

  • SurpriseSurprise

    The majority of us watched the same trial she did and would have voted for murder in the first degree– whether we believed it was premeditated or felony murder. WTF trial was this jury watching!?! Duct tape on a childs face was pretty sound evidence to me of a murder or at the very least you could deduce accidental death by chloroform with all that evidence? You might even deduce the tape was there to hold something with chloroform on it in place? Accidental drowning? My ass! Any NOT GUILTY person would have called 911 for help. Does it take a knife sticking out of the child’s head to prove murder? Baez and his defense team would probably argue the child rolled on the knife anyway… then carried her little winnie the pooh blanket, laundry bag AND trash bag down the street to the woods and climbed in! Oh… and if the child actually drowned why wouldn’t her DEFENSE ATTORNEY let the Texas Equisearch team that spent over $112,000 and countless volunteer man hours know that the child was dead??? Baez actually told Tim, the head of Equisearch that he couldn’t question his client??? She’s the one that initially said the baby was kidnapped by the nanny! Why wouldn’t he want her to help locate her supposedly “missing” child?? Baez smelled this case a mile away (probably Caylee’s decomposing body!) and chased this ambulance down! His mug was all over the media initially– trying to try this case in the media and garner high profile attention for his not so stellar career– and then he and his cronies complained that it was being tried in the media! We can only wish upon these jurors this very same jury of their peers if any of them are ever the victims of a serious crime themselves. Even if they are blessed to have the whole crime on tape as evidence, Mr. Defense attorney Baez would first fight to have the evidence inadmissable and then bring in six defense “experts” to show their tape was most likely altered anyway. And so it goes– our justice for all.

  • KYmom

    It is a sad day in America when it becomes necessary to have the murder of a child on video in order to convict the killer! I TRULY hope the good people of FL protest the homes & businesses of these idiot, money-hungry, fame whore, story selling jurors as much or MORE than they did the Anthony home. There needs to be a message sent that if you let yourself be put on a jury, YOU MUST DO YOUR JOB! Even if it doesn’t “feel good” to have some1′s life in your hands. You know the situation when you sign up for it. Casey Anthony certainly didn’t mind when it was Caylee’s life in her hands. This verdict is all about money, they wouldn’t be getting big checks or trips to Disney if they had returned a guilty verdict. Karma can be your best friend or your worst nightmare & these people have a lot to make up for. We need to get our poster-board & air-horns, find these people’s homes & send a strong message that if you put your bank account over justice for a murdered baby, you are damn well going to pay for it!

  • Anonymous

    Society now believes there can be NO DOUBT. THE CRIME MUST BE ON TAPE. WHEN THE PROOF IS ON TAPE…THEN THE “JURORS” WILL SAY…”WELL, IT COULD BE AN ACTOR–THAT MIGHT NOT BE HER PUTTING THOSE 3 PIECES OF TAPE ON CAYLEE’S MOUTH.”

  • Anonymous

    It is known that Defense Attorneys want the dumbest jurors possible…Baez got what he wanted.

  • Yewneek

    Double jeopardy. Google it.

  • Yewneek

    Double jeopardy. Google it.

  • Yewneek

    Boy, you people are sure quick to judge! You try being sequestered from basically your entire life (tv, phone, family, friends) for 6+ weeks then have the whole world judge you. Most of you don’t even know what you’re talking about.

  • Yewneek

    Boy, you people are sure quick to judge! You try being sequestered from basically your entire life (tv, phone, family, friends) for 6+ weeks then have the whole world judge you. Most of you don’t even know what you’re talking about.

  • Tracy

    You as a juror are a disgrace…I don’t even think you reviewed the evidence…And now you want to go on tv and try to justify your actions and get attention, maybe make some money..The evidence was there…You 12 morons chose to ignore it..Hope Calee visits you in your dreams as you all set a monster free!!!

  • eh

    This masculine juror has a criminal record herself. Look it up.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Luna-Petunia/100000789652822 Luna Petunia

    First of all, I don’t like when Jurists are Sequestered, after being just with each other for the what? 7 + weeks with a FEW VISITS from Family, I would think, though NONE OF THE JURISTS WILL EVER ADMIT IT, that they will start trying to rush to get a verdict; no matter what the verdict might be. This Jurist, DID NOT LIKE HER AT ALL! But, I had the same type of argument with my husband, he thinks they were probably right with their verdict ( he just came off jury duty about 3 weeks ago, so he knows EVERYTHING ABOUT THE LAW AND JURY DUTY….. AHHHHH!!!!!!! He is driving me CRAZY!!!!). This jurist and obviously the other 11 seem misinformed. Okay, the PROSECUTER should have gone for MURDER 2 instead of MURDER 1, or maybe the PROSECUTER SHOULD HAVE GIVEN A WHOLE FREAKIN’ MENU for the jury to decide, instead of just Murder 1 and Manslaughter-you know murder 1-3 Manslaughter, unvoluntary Manslaughter, homicide, etc. etc. and how did they not find her GUILTY OF CHILD ABUSE!!!! Other courts, other juries, find people guilty of murder WITHOUT A BODY! This is bullsh*t, what did these jurists NEED? A VIDEO OF CASEY ACTUALLY KILLING THE BABY?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Luna-Petunia/100000789652822 Luna Petunia

    I have a big big problem with this jurist and probably every other jurist. These idiots, absolute idiots. They needed so much from others, but not from Casey. For this Jurist to say-we do not know if she was murdered or how she was murdered. A child who dies naturally does not die with DUCT TAPE ON HER MOUTH! and then put’s her own body in a trash bag and gets her own dead body OFF TO THE WOODS AND BURIES HERSELF IN THE LEAVES. She, the jurist WOULD NOT ASSUME for Casey in regards for Murder, but she was assuming for George Anthony over and over again. “he was getting angry on the stand’ on the tapes when Casey was in jail, ‘he sat back, rubbing Cindy, and Cindy was asking the questing while he just sat there, back, NOT ASKING ANYTHING.’ She said this MADE HIM INVOLVED WITH CASEY in the death of Caylee. (???????????). Can’t just be his PERSONALITY? An ANGRY COP PERSONALITY? Amazing, she made assumptions on George but would not on Casey. As did some on else, I forgot, yesterday, when I saw a clip when George was asked WHY, when he smelled the ‘smell of death’ he did not call the police immediately’ instead took the car home. (I can understand that-for SOME-he wanted to open it in private to see who or what was in there and take it in BY HIMSELF and decide what to do, BY HIMSELF.

  • Dave

    This chick is a freakin’ retard. And that’s based on the evidence.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather

    Me too! Did the jurors not see the lessor charges they could’ve charged her with! I wonder how they an sleep at night. How can they let such B R A I N D E A D people on the jury.. They so damn dumb they run Jeff Ashton off because he is so appalled by the verdict. JP seem less then happy too!! Did these jurors even read the instructions?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather

    Me too! Did the jurors not see the lessor charges they could’ve charged her with! I wonder how they an sleep at night. How can they let such B R A I N D E A D people on the jury.. They so damn dumb they run Jeff Ashton off because he is so appalled by the verdict. JP seem less then happy too!! Did these jurors even read the instructions?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather

    When you decide to become a juror that is something that you take an oath to do. Being sequestered shouldn’t make it any different. If someone doesn’t want to be sequestered a judge will usually not make them a juror.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather

    There were lesser charges which seemed appropriate.. I don’t know how they didn’t come up with at least one?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather

    Yeah I thought you were only supposed to decide based on facts. Not by what was said in an opening statement and not how someone appeared or judging with your emotions. It seems like everything you are told not to do as a juror she seems to bring up.. I don’t get it?

  • Jeanne

    Ms. Ford states ““I’m still confused. I have no idea what happened to that child.” Then why did the jury rush to a decision? No review of the mountain of factual evidence? No questions? No request to visit the swamp where Casey Anthony dumped the body of her child? No request to visit the vehicle and car trunk? No questions about chloroform? No requests to review documented testimony? My advice for Ms. Ford is to listen carefully to a re-play of the final rebuttal given by state’s attorney Linda Drain-Burdick. Every single bit of evidence pointed to one person, and that is Casey Anthony. I say shame on every member of that jury! Casey Anthony’s life in the free world is going to be hell. She deserves that.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather

    Exactly if confused and lost try reviewing the evidence. They were just in a rush to go home and try to start selling interviews.. Horrible.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G74MHRYI5PUSGQURFMWCGYDZW4 Heather

    Exactly if confused and lost try reviewing the evidence. They were just in a rush to go home and try to start selling interviews.. Horrible.

  • Judy

    I can’t believe these people said the state couldn’t prove their case that it was all speculation. are you kidding me, they are speculating the George had something to do with it, even though there is no evidence that he did. I’m so sick of hearing that they think “well George appeared to be lying, so we just couldn’t believe him” did you 12 even listen to all the lies the Casey told and yet you believed that she is now telling the truth the Caylee drowned. Duck tape, garbage bags, a proven laundry bag that came from the house, Casey saying that Caylee drowned, so therefore, she had the body, so she must be the one who threw Caylee in the swamp. These 12 people couldn’t find that is child abuse. Why Ms. Ford, didn’t you find her guilty of manslaugher or better yet IF YOU GUYS WEREN’T SURE WHY DIDN’T YOU JUST SAY YOU WERE NOT SURE AND LET THERE BE ANOTHER TRIAL, INSTEAD OF SAYING WELL WE DONT KNOW SO LETS JUST LET HER GO. OH WAIT YOU PROBABLY WOULDN’T BE GETTING PAID FOR YOU INTERVIEW THEN WOULD YOU. NO ONE SHOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE MONEY OFF THE DEATH OF A LITTLE GIRL. DO YOU INTERVIEW FOR FREE.

  • Jeff L Hartley

    Jennifer Ford is a hypocrite. First she condescendingly says she needs proof before she judges another. Then she concludes George Anthony was involved in the coverup. There was NO EVIDENCE of that. Casey was responsible for Cayley when she went missing and later the child was found dead. This was a no brainer. The jurors wanted their escape and justice would have taken too long.

  • Callamommy

    Get over it. The prosecution approved ALL the jury members. Respect their decision, even if you’re obsessively disagreeing. Go out into the world and do something to help someone who needs it instead of sitting around fuming and stewing about something that’s OVER now.

  • LaurenCakes

    And you’re in the same rush to assume you know what these jurors think and feel and plan to do.
    The trial is OVER. Get a life…

  • PJC

    This juror just wants her 15 minutes of fame…..

  • Childs

    Exactly right! this juror failed onm several counts:
    1. Clearly confused Reasonable doubt with No doubt.
    2. A major part of her decision was based on her not trusting George???
    3. Stated that “they started to review the evidence, but couldnt get past the fact that they didnt know how she dies…they failed in their responsibility as jorors to review the evidence!!!!

  • Childs

    You are truly what is wrong with society. You think you are superior for being able to brush this off, but some people are appauled that a cornerstone of our legal system, the jury, is irrevocably broken and must be addressed. If you are ready to roll over already, go right ahead. I for one am not and will be pushing for a trained jury as employees of the federal or state government.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rhonda-Roeder-Edwards/1494513800 Rhonda Roeder Edwards

    This Jennifer Ford amazes me to say that it is more believable that Caylee drowned that it was murder. You don’t duck tape someone who has drowned. The coroner ruled it a homicide. Did she not hear that evidence? She makes me sick!! I agree with Jeanne, they did not ask to see anything, yet said they did not have proof. A dead child with duck tape should have been all the evidence they needed along with her behavior.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_74EOHXR74H4ACMIP5XNUWOLETQ True Lies

    This is a veritable blueprint for parents like Casey on how to do it & get away with it !!! Discard the body someplace where it won’t be discovered til it disintegrates so there’s no evidence left.

    This shows that many people don’t have a nodding acquaintance with deductive reasoning. How does a 2 y.o. end up with tape over its mouth in a garbage bag dumped in a swamp unless murder was involved ??

    The trial was hijacked when Baez “put George Anthony on trial”. George Anthony was NOT on trial. Baez was OBFUSCATING. Based on comments from the alternate juror, the jury fell for it. Three-card Monte.

    Isn’t this an extension of the dumbing down of America ? I feel like I’m living in a parallel universe.

    Baez made a lot of allegations in his opening statement & then never presented any evidence as to such. He was merely obfuscating … & it worked.

    Yesterday, i heard a harrowing statistic. 80% of jurors make up their minds during opening remarks…implying that they then don’t really listen to the ensuing evidence. You can say the moon is made of green cheese in your opening statement.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_74EOHXR74H4ACMIP5XNUWOLETQ True Lies

    This is a veritable blueprint for parents like Casey on how to do it & get away with it !!! Discard the body someplace where it won’t be discovered til it disintegrates so there’s no evidence left.

    This shows that many people don’t have a nodding acquaintance with deductive reasoning. How does a 2 y.o. end up with tape over its mouth in a garbage bag dumped in a swamp unless murder was involved ??

    The trial was hijacked when Baez “put George Anthony on trial”. George Anthony was NOT on trial. Baez was OBFUSCATING. Based on comments from the alternate juror, the jury fell for it. Three-card Monte.

    Isn’t this an extension of the dumbing down of America ? I feel like I’m living in a parallel universe.

    Baez made a lot of allegations in his opening statement & then never presented any evidence as to such. He was merely obfuscating … & it worked.

    Yesterday, i heard a harrowing statistic. 80% of jurors make up their minds during opening remarks…implying that they then don’t really listen to the ensuing evidence. You can say the moon is made of green cheese in your opening statement.

  • sondra

    I would like to know what this juror imagine IS evidence that Cayce did away with her child……even if by admitted accident. I would have rendered a decision of GUILTY by the evidence shown. Who would sit in jail for THREE LONG YEARS and subject themselves to potentially losing their own life in a murder trial instead of admitting – at some point during those years and before trial – that it was an accident!!!!! I don’t care who you are; that makes NO SENSE.

  • EDDIE

    so true, this jury was and is a joke!!!! they let a child killer go free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! dont backtrack now!!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/cat.cotton2010 Cat Collins

    Coward.

  • http://www.facebook.com/cat.cotton2010 Cat Collins

    Did they even see the duct tape on the skull and the fact that the baby was triple bagged. Again, COWARD

  • Callamommy

    Get a grip and realize that you’re living in a country with a fair constitution. When you go to trial you are judged by your PEERS. Just because you disagree with their verdict doesn’t mean the system doesn’t work as best it can. As I said earlier, go help people who need help, real people, and quit sitting on the internet *ahem* “crabbing” about this one trial. This jury did its job. Don’t agree? Learn to deal with it.

    Better yet, take some time to go back to school and learn to spell.

  • Pflorida

    Let’s say Morton Thiokol was an individual (not a company). They made the o-rings for the space shuttle challenger. This person is being blamed for the cause of the accident challenger. They are on trial for, purposefully making bad o-rings. Also a lesser charge with gross negligence in making the o-rings and even a third and even lesser charge of just making a part that was the cause of the accident with no malice or gross negligence… So the jury and some of these people here would say that Thiokol is not responsible because we don’t know if the astronauts died on explosion or hitting the water, and therefore do not need to go any farther or look at any other possible cause of this explosion linked to Thiokol. This is the reasoning of the jury from Anthony case.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=520667440 Ros Doneghy

    They need to do mental competency test and IQ tests on prospective jurors. OMG, she is studying to be a nurse. She is a stupid woman. She looks like she is mentally challenged.

  • Roadog

    You don’t need to establish cause of death to convict someone of murder. Scott Peterson was sent to death row for killing his wife Laci and their unborn baby even though the prosecution could not establish cause of death.

  • Anonymous

    I think everything she said was truthful and well said. I know i’ll get a lot of slack for posting my opinion, but if the proof of Casey committing the murder wasn’t there, then she could not have been found guilty for murdering her child. Sure, strong facts pointed to the fact that Casey’s daughter was murdered, but it could not have been proven that Casey committed it. Everyone is saying that the jury was not educated enough to understand the “facts” of this case. They didn’t understand them because there weren’t none!!! It’s so frustrating that everyday people are still blaming the jurors for it being a fault in the US Jury System. Unfortunately, you can not be convicted of murder without proof and partying away while your child is dead is not a crime. I think everyone needs to grow up and realize where the change needs to happen, because calling jurors names and complaining about it on an online post is not going to make it any different.

  • Anonymous

    I couldn’t agree more.

  • Anonymous

    I understand that you are upset with the verdict, as am I. I am upset that there is no justice with Calee, but the fact of the matter is that the jury just might have done their job. Calling people morons and wishing them harm and unrest isn’t the way to go with this. Try contacting your elected officials and see what you can do to make change happen in our Jury System. Unfortunately, partying while your child is dead and not reporting her missing is not a crime in the US. This needs to change.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t decide to be a juror, you get told you’re going to be a juror. I’ve never been in a jury where we get to decided whether or not to be sequestered, you just are! It really stinks!!! I feel for these jurors….they only did their job and they probably didn’t even want to be there!!!

  • kt kt

    I was understanding what she was saying to a point until she started talking about George. So you can’t convict on speculation but you acquitted on speculation about George. Not right.

  • Rogue

    Isn’t there a law in the states that forbids juror’s to discuss the case? Its an honest question I don’t know how American law works,

  • http://twitter.com/jen_pennybug Anne

    Well it looks like the defense tactic of trying to confuse the jury worked. And part of the reason they didn’t have forensics or couldn’t probe how Caylee died was because her body was left to rot, decompose, & be eaten by animals in a swamp by someone, & that was Casey. It makes me sick to my stomach this “woman” got away w/murder. There were lesser charges the jury could & should have found her guilty on.

  • Amazin_likes

    Hmmmmmm.

  • Annette

    Wow Jennifer Wow! You just couldn’t find ANY evidence? Yet you know enought to “feel sick to your stomach”? I certainly hope you enjoyed your large extended family vacay to Disney World. You were simply LAZY. You stated the jury attempted to go thru a few pages of documentation and…..then what? Too much work to read thru it? Just wanted to go home? Jurors convinct each & everyday without a body or knowing how the person died. Have you also never heard of Scott Peterson?

    Clearly Casy Anthony WAS acquited by a jury of her peers – 12 idiotic, lazy people.

  • Izac_izfly

    Karma will not be kind to Ms.Ford ! She was AT LEAST GUILTY of Manslaughter & Negligence. Hope that trip to Disney World was worth it you heartless bitch.

  • justsayin

    This juror and her peers followed the letter of the law as it is written in the State of Florida. If you don’t like it, write your senator.

  • Juror Jennifer Ford is a Moron

    The Constitution guarantees Casey Anthony a right to a “jury of her peers”. Casey is an uneducated, unethical moron….and clearly the jury is too. 12 people and not a single brain among them. They and the sociopath they released into society should all be removed from the gene pool.

  • Justme

    Between this juror and Cindy Anthony, if I ever need a nurse don’t call one of these idiots. Cindy is pulling up stuff on the internet that she is supposed to know (as a nurse). Jennifer Ford is obviously an ignorant fool. She says George was dishonest, what about Cindy? They weren’t asked to determine how the child died, just who caused it. (to justsayin) the did not follow the letter of the law. They were supposed to go over the evidence. For 6 weeks they were not speaking about it, then all of the sudden, they discuss the whole thing in 10 hours and 40 minutes.

  • Lydia

    Just like the O.J. Simpson jury and the Robert Blake murder. Very uneducated jurors and very stupid decisions.

  • bigcaddyjc

    First off jenna thank you for saying the truth in front of this emotional response by so many people who think they know all. 2) Nancy Grace really has it coming this women realy thinks she speaks on/for all of America’s social shortcomings but I think no one really cares what she sys since it’s always the same”blah, blah,blah,blah”

  • BigCaddyJc

    Bravo! Jenna bravo! your voice of reason against these many Nancy grace clones is so refreshing…and truthful…thank you1

  • Moorem0156

    The lawyers in this trainwreck showed little ability and much sleaze ,on both sides…the jurors had little to no options but to do the right thing and find this troubled little strange person not guilty…the system worked1 Bravo to all of the jurors…Bravo!

  • snake

    I’m guessing Scott Peterson would have loved to have a jury that believes the state needs to prove how someone died.

  • snake

    If the jurors were so conflicted with the result, why didn’t they at least reveiw the evidence that was available a little longer than they did?

    Afterall, CASEY [through her attorneys] absolutely removed any other suspect from this crime.

  • mnshannon

    There were only two manners of death that could be ruled out based upon the findings, suicide and natural causes. The two left on the table were murder and accident with no cause of death substantiated. Given it a dry bones, circumstantial case it appears the prosecution overcharged the defendant and thus forfeited the probability of a guilty verdict in a capital case due to the fact there was not one solid quantitative piece of evidence which would have incriminated the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt, rather, the prosecution presented almost an entire body of evidence which was qualitative in nature. There also was no evidence of child abuse, negligence or malice found in the defendants history, nor any, where the body was resumed which could lead directly back to the defendant. The investigators and later prosecutors did not provide compelling findings to the fact. The jury did make a reasoned and objective ruling based upon the findings given and in accordance to the law. No doubt this jury carried a great burden, and ultimately they upheld the integrity of our legal system.

  • Lydia

    Troubled little person??? Are you kidding?? Caylee was the troubled little person because she was bound for trouble with this murderer from the moment she was born. And now that this murderer wants to have more kids, who is going to save them from her insanity. She’s a sociopath. Bravo to the jurors???? You sound as ignorant as we know they are!!!

  • Lydia

    Juror # 3 also says she sleeps very well at night! Maybe her dreams won’t be so pleasant anymore.

  • Lydia

    I am not a Nancy Grace clone idiot! But I know that this pathological liar, this sociopath/psychopath is guilty as sin!

  • Lydia

    Another moron heard from. You probably would like to high five Casey Anthony like her stupid attorneys were doing. You say that the other person should quit sitting at the internet crabbing about this trial. You’re doing the same thing!! Wonder what you would do if someone harmed or murderered your child. You’re as ignorant as this jury was!

  • Simplenothard

    This case would normally be very hard with all the dots to connect. But the defense (ie the defendant, Casey) made it very simple. She did not as most murder defendants say, hey I was not there I have no idea what happened to the victim, but it wasn’t me. The defense was, the kid died in the pool on June 16 and Casey and the father covered it up. However that can’t be the case because Casey said it was a Nanny initially. And she would not have said that if the child died by accident. She would of said the child died by accident or it was my Dad he knows.
    So since Casey was nice enough to let us know that June 16 was indeed the day the child died, ( the defense statement June 16th) With that as a fact two days latter her asking to get the shovel from the neighbor now proves the father was not in on it or he would have let Casey into the shed, or done it himself to get the supplies to get rid of the body.

  • Anonymous

    Sooo…how much money is she getting for coming forward to discuss the case???

  • lyla

    DO YOU HAVE CHILDREN???????????????????????????

  • banff

    How old are you? Have you followed this case? Who do you think threw Calyee within walking distance of Casey’s house? The skull had vines growing through it. I suggest you watch someone other than Nancy Grace. Obviously you watch her, otherwise you would not comment about her in your BigCaddyJc response to Jenna. Are you a man or women?

  • Juror #3 is a Moron

    Anyone with an IQ above 85 knows Casey Anthony killed her daughter. This is PROOF POSITIVE that juries need to pass IQ tests before serving. Casey lucked out that the jury was a bunch of IDIOTS.

    I thought maybe the jury had a logical explanation for their insane verdict, but now that they’re talking I’ve found that they’re even dumber than I suspected.

    Note to the Anthony jurors: Better to keep your mouth shut and have people *think* you’re stupid, than open your mouth and remove ALL doubt…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZJEPOCYRXGK6WNLYWW5BIC67U4 CathyS

    Moorem I see……………. birds of a feather flock together? It’s quite obvious that you and the ” idiot 12″ cannot connect the dots nor put 2 and 2 together. Here’s the first clue to a murder ……… firmly secure duct tape over your mouth and nose ensuring you don’t get any oxygen ( which obviously you and the 12 are already lacking) and come back and post at a later date!!!!!

  • hanklovesongwriter17

    I hope I do not wind up in her health care facility by accident of some kind, she might shoot me up with bleach for a pain killer instead…..stupid nurse, oh yeah your sick to your decision because you know you let a killer walk free.

  • http://societyfordaintydamsels.wordpress.com Fennel

    I think what saved Casey Anthony from a guilty verdict was the duct tape testimony, findings by her defense team, especially Jose Baez. The question , controversy was when the duct tape put on the scull. That to me is the vital inquiry. Was it put on before to murder poor Calley or post mortem, to hold up the scull intact? That query is what I believe left doubt for the jurors not to convict I figure they believed they couldn’t pronounce a guilty verdict unless they were absolutely certain, sans doubt OTOH I think it was pretty clever, in retrospect for Casey not to report her daughter missing for at least a month. I found that strange, bewildering, perplexing. How can a “concerned” mother not report her own child for such a long time? Found that extremely suspicious to say the least. Me thinks the bottom line is the jury felt they couldn’t convict unless they felt there was absolute proof. I think the prosecution didn’t succeed in showing that. So what they decided didn’t necessarily mean they thought she didn’t murder her daughter but that they took literally the onus of proof.

  • Concerned citizen

    So the high profile cases end up with jurors who just want to get out of there, right, or make money? Of course no one wanted to stick around after the quick verdict. There is the concerned, conscientious public to face, now their judges, their jury on their decision.
    The defense confusing the jury was successful?????? Go figure. In our state and most others this evidence would result in a guilty verdict of something other than lying.
    Jennifer Ford: Listen to the instructions better: PUNISHMENT is not part of the jury’s duties and is not part of their consideration when reaching a decision!!!!

  • Morgan

    Juror #3 – SHAME on you ! You let a child murderer go free and then took blood money from CBS. You’re disgusting !

  • Anonymous

    This is why there should be a be an IQ test to serve on a jury. Shame on you Juror #3 for not following the instructions.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JSXIUXEVNM5Q3ONA3XBIM6IWDE QueenBofOB

    And don’t leave out that this crazy broad is studying to be a nurse as well. God help us all…

  • Fkm04

    some of the comments here are as stupid as the jurors. The state DID NOT shave to prove cause of death nor did they have to prove motive. These two idiot jurors have admitted that they basically believed jose Baez’s opening statement and quit listening. Opening statement is NOT evidence and they are to disregard it as such. They also admitted to not being able to give her death…they are expressly prohibited from considering penalty in the guilt phase!!! Casey Anthony was charged with ‘several lesser crimes including aggrevated manslaughter of a child and these bone heads didn’t even convict on that. These jurors didn’t take their notebooks into the deliberation room, nor did they request any evidence to review. They have made a joke of our justice system and as an AMERICAN i’m disgusted. No justice for Caylee.

  • JurorsneedIQtest

    Does anybody know who Sandra Good is? She was a member of the Manson family and this thing named Jennifer Ford reminds me of her. Her way of speaking and psycho facial expressions-really, it’s uncanny. Can u imagine this Jennifer driving down the highway and seeing a car wrapped around a telephobne pole with a guys head thru the windshield-She would say maybe the car was smashed up in a wreaking yard and was brought here to look like it just had a collision–and that guy with it’s head thru the windshield? well, maybe he drowned in a swimming pool and someone brought him here and pushed his head thru the windshield? Who knows, maybe he died before his head went thru that windshield and for some reason someone made it look this way…I wouldn’t want to speculate

  • peaJay

    The short deliberation time says it all. I would like a reporter to ask her (and the others that will come out of hiding for their blood money) if they bothered to make a chart of all the evidence provided by the prosecution. Of course they did not. They didn’t take the time to. And I’m guessing that none of them could list for us what all that evidence is, because they didn’t bother to pay attention to it during the trial. A jury watcher stated that of the jurors who took notes, they primarily did ONLY when the testimony went to MOTIVE. During all or most of the technical and scientific testimony, they looked bored and/or were inactive and inattentive. Though I admit it is difficult at times to skip over the parts of the trial we were privy to but they were not, I CAN make a chart of all the REAL EVIDENCE presented, which there is a PLETHORA OF (for those that love to state there is hardly any), and EVERY SINGLE PATH leads to only one person. And like a good Vulcan, I can take the emotion out of it. Manner of death = Homicide. That means SOMEONE KILLED HER, Juror # 3, et al. All the evidence provided to you pointed to the defendant. Show me one piece of evidence that REASONABLY gives doubt to any of it. Right, none was presented. I know, I shouldn’t waste any more time or energy on something I cannot change, HOWEVER, do we not need to be concerned with the NEXT sociopath who kills? One thing is for certain, KC DID indeed get a “jury of her peers” (read: uneducated) for her trial. For the record, despite the obvious and well documented “malice aforethought”, I do not think the state should have gone for a DP case here. But it has already been pointed out by others here that Juror #3 is either clueless or lying, for there were lesser charges they could have found her guilty of, but chose not to (not including the lying to LE charges, which are a joke). I thought we would end up with a hung jury because of the highest charge having the possibility of death attached to it. I had no idea we actually had 12 brain dead idiots up there. Well, the first vote was 10-2. The 2 should have fought harder.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CDAHZ6ZQ4OBAQ6EB6Y3SBKFEGU Rebecca

    Jennifer Ford was delighted to be chosen for this trial. ABC paid for her entire family to visit Disney World (including her aunts, uncles, and cousins) along with her receiving money from other media outlets for her ignorant jury story. She loves her 15 minutes. Juror #6 is holding out for a $50,000 sum of money. Shame on the whole bunch of you for not convicting at least on Aggravated Child Abuse!! I think Casey Anthony should move to Pinellas County and offer free babysitting for the jurors’ children and grandchildren.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CDAHZ6ZQ4OBAQ6EB6Y3SBKFEGU Rebecca

    Jennifer Ford was eager to be a juror on this trial. She was “delighted” when they chose her, and now she wants her “15 minutes” to explain her ignorance as a juror. Time to get out of the spotlight Ms. Ford because it makes most of us sick to our stomachs to hear you explain how you and the other jurors allowed a child-killer to be set free.

  • flavia

    STUPID

  • flavia

    jennifer forrd U WILL FEEL BAD FOR HELPING CASEY GET AAY W/ MURDER, HOW CAN U SAY THAT ” HOW SHE PUT DUCT TAPE AND PUT HER IN THE TRUNCK OF HER CAR” IT WAS IN PUBLIC OF COURSE SHE WAS IN HER PARENTS HOUSE WHEN THAT HAPPENED, THERE WERE MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE ONLY U GUYS DIDN’T SEE IT ONE OF U BETTER ADMITTE THAT WAS A FRAUD OR ALL OF U WILL BE HUNTED FROM YOUR OWN GUILTY FEELING.

  • flavia

    jurors did a terroble job they didn’t know what they were doing.
    lil caylee is dead and the jurors failed on her.

  • flavia

    jurors did a terroble job they didn’t know what they were doing.
    lil caylee is dead and the jurors failed on her.

  • likeomg

    What’s with this idiot’s face? Miss Potato Head.

  • annemarie

    this juror is not very astute or alert or bright. i would stop making tv appearances before she says any more stuppid things. if she is an indication of the others, wow. . there are so many instructions by the judge that should have stuck. the prosecuters did a great job and we all thought that the jury would get it. are they kidding??

  • LT

    Why would you bother putting duct tape on a skull to hold it intact? What’s the purpose of that? It’s been discarded obviously you don’t care about it anymore. I’m sorry but that makes zero sense in any case scenario.

  • Jean

    thay new what happened to that baby shame on them see her face after every one was gone get real she did it my god 31 days later she calls the cops if my grand child went
    missing for an hour l would go nuts and call 911 my daughter and every one would go looking with the cops for her SHAME ON YOU TO.

  • Echo4mom

    your wright what a shame that mom got off with killing her baby and not calling the cops 31 days she was missing that family had some thing to do with it did you see her face after every one was gone it makes me so sick l hope she,s runs all her life and keeps running shame on all of them KILLER,S.

  • Deb_lewis

    Good job you nailed it!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nicosia-Sloan-Petronella/1349900456 Nicosia Sloan-Petronella

    Ms Ford, you ma’m, are an idiot.

  • Joke

    This hideous looking woman is more idiotic than I thought. I’m thinking with her deduction skills she has the IQ of a mentally challenged individual. I am appalled that this creature was permitted to serve on the jury (a great duty/privilege of an American). Her bizarre facial features and stare in her eye is as creepy as Casey Anthony’s. Even an IMBECILE DERELICT knew Anthony killed her baby. The circumstanstial evidence was mountainous!!! What a disgrace to anyone who has made it past the 2nd grade. I hope “it” sleeps well at night. Heinous…both physically and intellectually.

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    she’s right…double jeopardy…she cant be taken to trial against

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    she’s right…double jeopardy…she cant be taken to trial against

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    because the DA is a bunch of idiots…why do you think the lead prosecutor is “retiring”?

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    no..she’s defending the justice system. in the US it’s INNOCENT until proven GUILTY…if you want it the other way around, by all means, petition it, so we can be like the rest of the world

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    certain cases hold certain special rules…in this case, there was no gag order to stop the jury from talking…even with the gag order, they would still talk by giving false names

  • Liz

    Well at least Casey Anthony was tried by a “jury of her peers.’ This fat, babbling, money-hungry imbecile proves it.

  • Liz

    Well at least Casey Anthony was tried by a “jury of her peers.’ This fat, babbling, money-hungry imbecile proves it.

  • Mark

    Well fatty enjoy your 15 minutes and save your money. Your going to need it.

  • Joke

    I couldn’t even finish watching the video of this IQ challenged female. It’s so shocking and appalling that one is left speechless as to the idiocy of these jurors’ logic and intelligence. Shocking. I have now seen the bar raised for the biggest morons in this century.

  • MLRTrow

    In a court of law they only have to prove that they did it – stop watching TV so much and read a book or something – get some common sense. This ignorant woman just made thousands of dollars for an interview – 32 just now going to school to be a nurse, do you know anything about the welfare system in FL and why a lot of “older women” are in nursing school in FL? Re-watch the video what does the rhetoric point to?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    The majority of us did NOT watch the same trial she did. SHE, along with the remaining jurors, was sequestered… something crucial to any jury, especially in a high profile case such as this, in remaining unbiased. Majority of the people watching this trial are not unbiased. The media has had a field day with this case from the beginning, choosing to try it in the court of public opinion rather than leaving it to the judicial system. Can you spell sensationalism? Let me do it for you… s-e-n-s-a-t-i-o-n-a-l-i-s-m! And defined: the act of shocking or intent to shock, especially through the media; the practice of using startling but superficial efïects, in art, literature, etc., to gain attention. Nancy Grace should have her picture next to that in the dictionary. Whatever happened to, innocent until proven guilty? Ahhh… you can’t say that you adhered to that, now can you? Everyone is so quick to point the finger at the jury, and how ignorant they are/were. May I remind each and every one of you… there is a thing called jury selection. Prosecution and defense decide on the jury pool. If you want to place blame, then your prosecution is equally as faulty as the defense. Now what? And all of you out here, giving your two cents… none of you were there! Not a single one of you heard this trial like the jury did. And most if not all of you, convicted her way before the trial started. The jury did the right thing, with what they had. And they should all sleep well at night. This is not the first Caylee/Casey Anthony scenario. This has happened before. It just hasn’t been sensationalized, as this was. And if the jurors didn’t understand the instructions, perhaps they weren’t correctly instructed? Is that a possibility? Who knows. This is a jury of our peers. I find it hard to believe that all 12 were incompetent. Very hard to believe. And all it would take is one competent juror, to stand up and say something. No one did. They based their decision on what was presented to them. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Casey Anthony is no saint. But nowhere was it proven, that she was a murderer either. Perhaps those having such a problem with this, should look to the ones that were over-zealous in making this a death penalty case. We can’t live our lives on what if’s, but I’d be willing to bet that if they went for a lesser charge to begin with, they would have gotten far better results. The real tragedy here, is that a little girl died. We don’t know how, or why or who. Kudos to the jurors for doing their job, as it should have been done.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    LOL… on that last line? Practice what you preach.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    Hey Joke… the joke is on you. How old are you?! Since when did someones looks have anything to do with their level of intelligence? Wow! Your level of maturity indicates YOU haven’t made it beyond the 2nd grade. If you’re going to pass judgment, then do it on something of merit, loser… the only one’s mentally challenged are you and the 3 people who “liked” what you had to say. And only an imbecile derelict would think they KNOW Anthony killed her child. Anyone else with an ounce of intelligence, would require proof. I hope to God you never sit on a jury, you’d convict the elephant man based on his looks.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    OMG! Maturity and intelligence at their finest!

  • Luv2jrny

    I totally agree that it isn’t necessary to prove motive or cause of death in order to find a person guilty. These jurors did not know HOW to deliberate per the law. Also, Jennifer Ford was concerned about the “punishment,” and per the law, the jury is only supposed to prove guilt or innocence, NOT the punishment! There were lesser charges that would not have been given the death penalty, but these jurors were completely overwhelmed. Too bad charges can’t be filed against these jurors since they did not try and put the pieces of evidence together. It was too much for them to mentally accomplish, and my guess is that they were in a hurry to return to Clearwater. Justice has not been served for Caylee!

  • Angelacross80

    Did they go by the NUT HOUSE to pick these jurors! Ms. Ford is a NUT CASE! The smell of decomposition, missing child for 31 days, throwing body away like trash, not calling 911, sitting in jail for nearly 3 yrs for an accidental death and she couldn’t connect the dots!

  • Cathy

    Thank you it isn’t necessary to prove motive or cause of death also reasonable doubt means exactly that. This juror Jennifer Ford is an absolute retard she has no idea what she was doing and let a murderer go free. She’s as dumb as a box of rocks and thats beyond bluntly honest. There is absolutely no other logical explanation to that baby’s death other then the fact that her mother murdered her. Nothing else fits, it was the jurors responsibilities to be logical and to piece together the evidence. In my entire life I have never seen another case where there was so much evidence pointing to one person and in this case that would be Casey. The prosecution did everything but show a video of her actually killing her. You should be ashamed of yourself.

  • Cathy

    Jennifer I suggest that you go and hide with Casey, and when your in hiding you could look over that interview that you did and see what a dumb idiot you look like when you said that there wasn’t enough evidence. Are you really that mentally challenged I hope that they ban you from not only being a juror in the future but from also being a nurse, actually we may not have to worry about either since your fate may be unknown at this point after the stunt you pulled.

  • Quickfix4groups

    Were they too lazy to use the evidence available to them during deliberation, or just not smart enough in general to understand what th purpose of the evidence was.
    I know this was one of the jurors who didn’t bother taking notes. That combined with her hurry to get on TV makes me wonder what her true agenda was. She definitely isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer.

  • Cathy

    Jennifer you are such a dumb bitch do you really think that if this was an accident that Casey would have sat in jail for 3 years for something that was an accident. Do you really think that her father George would have allowed his daughter to sit in jail awaiting a death sentence for an innocent accident. Logically do you really think that this family went through all the hatred and media coverage and all of this if it was just an accident. ARE YOU REALLY THAT STUPID. If Caylee really had an accident in the pool all they had to do was call 911 and it would have been done with, drowning accidents unfortunately are very common, so common that the police wouldn’t have even thought twice about it. But what your saying is that Caylee drowned by accident and yet this is how it turned out. George sat begging for information to find his grand daughter he hung signs and traveled everywhere there was a sighting of Caylee, he fought with the media and drove every single day with that huge missing sign on his car and yet you have the nerve to even suggest that George Anthony had anything to do with this. Or the fact that there was duck tape wrapped around the babies head byt yet it was an accident, I didn’t know that if you drowned that it was a requirement to wrap duck tape around the babies head and throw her in the trash. You truly are dumb.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    And… the burden of proof lies with? The prosecution. Solely. End of story.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    *rolling my eyes* at the people calling the juror(s) stupid, as they recount the duck tape evidence.

    It’s duct tape… not duck tape!

    “Aflac!!!” – a duck has been recorded, that would be “duck” tape!

    Better get all your ducks in a row, before you start talking S^%#!

    Sorry, I just had to say something about that.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    But we actually do know, the astronauts were most definitely alive, when they hit the water. It was that impact that killed them, immediately.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t deny that she wants her 15 minutes of fame….in fact, I agree with you.

  • Justus4cayle

    In the United States of America we are innocent until proven guily, they did not prove their case period, you are all going on emotions, do I think she is guilty???? yes I do, just like all of you think,,,,but the state did not prove it if you think that they did then maybe you need to look at the law look at the evidence and what the law states they have to prove……you fail to forget if casey did do it one day she will answer to God forget about our world look at the eternal side of this…its time for America to get back to their own lives and leave the Anthonys alone

  • Justus4cayle

    In the United States of America we are innocent until proven guily, they did not prove their case period, you are all going on emotions, do I think she is guilty???? yes I do, just like all of you think,,,,but the state did not prove it if you think that they did then maybe you need to look at the law look at the evidence and what the law states they have to prove……you fail to forget if casey did do it one day she will answer to God forget about our world look at the eternal side of this…its time for America to get back to their own lives and leave the Anthonys alone

  • Anonymous

    Shame on me? What did I do??? Shame on you for placing blame on me. I never said I didn’t think Casey killed her daughter, in fact, I’m almost sure of it. However, the US Jury System requires “proof without a reasonable doubt” that someone is guilty of a crime before being punishable for it. It is that same system that does not consider not reporting a child missing a crime. It is NOT the jurors fault Casey was set free, it is the way the system works. There is a petition being passed around on the Internet called Caylee’s Law, you should consider signing it. I’m sorry if you’re upset, I am too, I simply am able to do what you obviously are not, and that is looking at the jurors situation without being bias.

  • Anonymous

    Shame on me? What did I do??? Shame on you for placing blame on me. I never said I didn’t think Casey killed her daughter, in fact, I’m almost sure of it. However, the US Jury System requires “proof without a reasonable doubt” that someone is guilty of a crime before being punishable for it. It is that same system that does not consider not reporting a child missing a crime. It is NOT the jurors fault Casey was set free, it is the way the system works. There is a petition being passed around on the Internet called Caylee’s Law, you should consider signing it. I’m sorry if you’re upset, I am too, I simply am able to do what you obviously are not, and that is looking at the jurors situation without being bias.

  • Anonymous

    Why is it that if someone points out how the US Jury System works, yall automatically think that we think Casey was innocent or that we are happy that an innocent child is dead??? Pointing out how things work is NOT an admission of acceptance of murder…..geesh, it’s getting annoying!!!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    You have a son in Iraq “fighting for this country”… and THIS is unspeakable?! I don’t envy your position, and I hope your son returns safely, but with all due respect… what is unspeakable, is that we’re in Iraq to begin with. If Caylee Anthony is a tragedy, then I have to seriously wonder how we classify all the true “first degree murders” that have taken place as a result of the ridiculous war we’ve started. Not to change the subject… but it’s interesting that the death of one little girl has riveted the nation in this manner. You think Casey Anthony is a terror and evil? She doesn’t hold a candle to Cheney & Bush.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    Speaking of being ashamed of oneself… your use of the word “retard” falls into the politically incorrect category. Your grammar is atrocious. And come over here a moment, let me help you remove those blinders. In addition to hindering your vision, I’m inclined to think that they’re clamped on too tightly, and that’s why you’re so narrow-minded.

  • Anonymous

    MMM….. How about the negligence of not reporting Caylee’s death for 31 DAYS as was freely admitted by the defense in Jose Baez’s opening statement with the leap of faith drowning?

  • Anonymous

    That was the state trial. There’s a move to try her in federal court for lieing to the FBI. Annother thing is if there is new evidence that she did in fact kill Caylee “double jepordy ” does not apply.

  • Anonymous

    Who told Jose baez in his opening statement that Caylee drowned on June 16, 2008? Who spent the following 31 days lieing and covering up that fact and Jose’s words “an accident that snowballed out of control” ? This was admitted by the defense!
    Casey should have been convicted of the lesser manslaughter charge that included negligence in its instruction!
    If there was a question, a note should have been sent to Judge Perry. After all so far several of the jurors have stated they did not believe Casey was innocent and we are led to believe that other jurors felt the same way!

  • Anonymous

    Juror # 2 has come out and said pretty much the same thing the other two are sayng #3 and #14) about the prosecution not proving their case. It was 10 to 2 for the death penalty. interestingly on the lesser charge of manslaughter it was 6 for and 6 against on Tuesday. With in several hours they all went for the not guilty. Juror #2 was one of the ones for the guilty verdict but finally went with the flow. What would change 6 jurors opinions for the lesser charge in just several hours when the defense admitted that in their opening argument it was an accidental drowning and their client proceeded to cover it up for 31 days until confronted by her parents and police? Wasn’t there neglegence involved which encompasses the charge of manslaughter??

  • Koala

    Maybe the educational system in California is more advanced and students are thought to process, analyze what they receive. The jurors in the Anthony case did not even take the time to look at the evidence to see where the evidence when combined lead. These jurors would have had a hard time putting together a 24 piece children’s puzzle.

  • Koala

    If the jurors did not see m1, why didn’t they see aggravated manslaughter?

  • Koala

    If each piece of evidence was taken singly, out of context they could not have proved Anthony guilty. However, when combined the evidence (circumstantial or not) clearly points directly at Casey and leaves no doubt of her guilt. The verdict should have been aggravated manslaughter.

  • Koala

    If the jurors would have found Anthony guilty, they would not be paid for information or personal interviews. The case would have gone to sleep after the celebration of the guilty verdict. I wonder if Caylee would have enjoyed a trip to Disney World? Think about that juror #3. Did your children have a good time? I hope you enjoyed your trip off the life of a helpless victim that you failed.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe they didn’t understand the instructions for which they should have asked the judge for clarification. There was neglegence which is part of the manslaughter charge. Neglegence in the fact that even the defense said it was an accidental drowning that snowballed. The negligence was when Anthony withheld the information for 31 days and then claimed Caylee was kidnapped and finally when found six months later made claimed she drowned.

  • PMB

    Juror #3 is ignorant. And the others? I wonder if they even read the judge’s instructions. And don’t the most ignorant like to talk?

  • Anonymous

    There was plenty of circumstantial evidence (in case you didn’t know…circumstantial evidence is still evidence). Her friend Amy testified that Casey was angry at her mother because she was cancelling going out more and more because she couldn’t find anyone to babysit and that she was increasingly upset about this. She also testified that Casey fought with her mother often because Cindy thought she was an unfit mother. She lied for two years about having a job so who was watching Caylee? When did she take naps? Snack?? Also, Caylee was reaching the age that she would start talking and possibly saying that there is no Zanaida or Zanny the nanny. Casey researched cloroform as the babysitter. The day Caylee died was the day after Casey had a horrible fight with her mother. Searches for cloroform. Duct tape still stuck to the jaw. The car smelled like a dead body and cloroform. She partied for 31 days until she said the nanny kidnapped the child. Lied and lied to police so they couldn’t find what they thought was still a living child. I can go on an on an on….this was a case that had OVERWHELMING evidence.

    Please….people who think like you should not serve on a jury. Please….please…if called, please decline….

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    oh, im LOLing at this.

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    emotions are running high. so those that defend the system are automatically labeled as defenders of baby killers…it happens

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    that could try new evidence but finding new evidence is hard…im kinda shocked that she wasn’t charged with obstruction of justice…so who knows…if she goes to federal prison, she could get like 4 years.

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    that is negligence but there was no evidence of child abuse in Casey Anthony’s history as a mother…in the PAST…before her child died, there was no case of child abuse, nothing. so…pictures prove she was a bad mother, not reporting Caylee missing is bad parenting, but no one ever filed a child abuse case against her when Caylee was alive

  • Koala

    I do not like junor 3 smiling during this interview, my God a child is dead! I hope she and her family had a good time at Disney World because of the death of Caylee. She is clueless.

  • Koala

    Maybe juror 3 thinks her father would throw her children in the swamp to rot just to hide the body. I wonder what kind of dysfunctional family she comes from.

  • Thorders

    She made a decision ignoring 30+ days of evidence. She reviewed nothing! She wishes she could have found her guilty of lesser chargers? HELLO! Lesser chargers were options. Idiot jurors are to blame.

    So she believes it could have been an accident? Best case: A mom allows her daughter to live with and be babysit by a severe sexual abuser and leaves the door to the pool unlocked, leading to her daughters death, but she isn’t guilty of aggravated child abuse?

    All evidence, YES evidence, leads to one conclusion and she failed to see it. Complete I.D.I.O.T.

  • Thorders

    Yes. This!

  • Lethal4483

    Because he’s been a prosecutor for 30 years??

  • Juan

    I guess she can now go back to the job she didn’t have t Universal and go partying and drinking again, now she’ll not only walk, but society’s morbid pervertion will make this woman rich by giving her the chanve to speak, she’s gonna make millions of dollars. This is a very sad day, a child was murder and the only 12 people in the world that actually believed her to be innocent were the ones selected to judge her. I wonder if the jury payed attention to anything that was said in court, unless the news feed that I was getting from the trial was edited and corrupted, I can’t understand how these people came to that determination. A gorgeous 2 year old little girl died, there’s a body, there’s enough evidence to prove she did it, there’s the endless lies, the non existant baby sitter, the car, the never reporting her missing and searching for her at clubs and parties. WHAT THE HELL WAS THIS JURY THINKING, WHAT IS IT THAT THEY DID NOT UNDERSTAND?

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    when losing a BIG case like this, you’re job is gone..had the prosecutor won, i bet he’ll be able to move up the latter in the political world …the state needs to fire someone so the lead prosecutor is the one getting axed…retiring is a cover-up.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BM56V4HIN3PSREW24KME3VSRZ4 m k

    “OMG, she is studying to be a nurse. She is a stupid woman She looks like she is mentally challenged.”

    Huh???? I’m really trying to process the relevance and sense of those statements. It’s like you’re having four conversations at once, none of it flows. I’d like you to point me in the direction, too, of what ‘mentally challenged’ looks like. I must be missing something, and I’m pretty sure I’m not mentally challenged. You on the other hand…

  • BubblesKiah

    umm the evidence of her abusing caylee was the fact that the child ended up dead after last being seen in her presence… even if she did or didn’t do it, given she was the caregiver at the time she is GUILTY of aggravated child abuse. Read it and weep. It’s all here: “The crime of Aggravated Child Neglect occurs:
    1.When a caregiver willfully or by culpable negligence fails to either:
    ◦Provide a child with the care, supervision, and services necessary to maintain the child’s physical and mental health that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of the child; or
    ◦Make a reasonable effort to protect a child from abuse, neglect, or exploitation by another person.
    2.And in failing to do so, causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child.
    A child is defined as any person under the age of 18 and a caregiver is defined as a parent, adult household member, or other person responsible for the child’s welfare.
    Neglect of a child may be based on repeated conduct or on a single incident or omission that results in, or could reasonably be expected to result in, serious physical or mental injury, or a substantial risk of death, to a child.”

    The jurors clearly didn’t know how to read…..

  • Lasso

    Well I guess Jennifer is getting her 15 minutes of fame! How can she make us believe how scared she is when she’s smiling thru her interview and trying to look like a Star that she will never be. She’s an uneducated idiot who didn’t understand the charges. 10 hours to deliberate? Come on, she along with the others wanted to get the heck out of there to start their interviews and get some BLOOD MONEY!!! Enjoy your new found fame because it won’t be long.

  • Mishelle

    no actually they were going to dismiss one or two of them, but they said they could do it, but at the same time the prosecution did not know Baez and Casey were going to orchestrate a “last minute” bogus accidental drowning theory either when she has always denied that for the past 3-yrs while lying about some Zanny the Nanny {for Jennifer knowing so much, you’d think she’d be hip to that term for Zanax since shes 32} too bad Baez made sure Padilla, the bounty hunter, who 1st bailed Casey out and his assistant, Casey’s “babysitter were barred from testifying about that song Casey played everyday about being under the water and hope it doesnt scream my name or the heart stickers she was placing on the assistants knees. LMAO@them saying maybe George killed Caylee; most def idiots in their own right!

  • Mariannelaacks

    Jennifer was certainly was trying to get into the spotlight! She should be ashamed of herself, and not seek attention from this most ridiculous verdict!!! TOTALLY DISGUSTING!!!

  • Jones

    Sociapaths condemn this sociapath… and yet you are fighting grammar but applaud the effort to free Anthony. Youre not for politically correct… so dont pretend. She killed the child and if people cant see that then she’s no longer the most dangerous thing around. Reasonable doubt is not doubt of reason or lack of any… it’s using reason to say… ‘hey anyone have any doubt other than one that is totally unreasonable’.

  • jones

    Troubled little person… okay well thing is… being a sociapath- pretty much a psychopath b/c she obviously killed… IS NOT INSANITY. Under the law it is not recognized as insanity just a personality disorder which is not seen as mental illness. But yeah its still very very sick, thing is they have control and they like it they really really like it and its the choice that is there that makes us responsible. As long as we had one – we are responsible. These jurors had a choice too and they may have a stronger case for insanity than her. so no, so not bravo.

  • guest

    LOL not to change the subject… you must be a lawyer.Only they can butcher words and ideas, misdirecting and playing on peoples emotions and frailties about things that have no relevance to the subject.I think what I would mean by that is… i freaking have friends fighting risking their lives for people like you that would throw my friends to sacrifice sooner than throw Anthony to justice.The death of one little girl dam well ought to be enough… because thats the thing we should love about this country.By the way… I would of loved to see you travel to the middle east to lay down your weapon.

  • Theedgejones

    Thats insane tho… okay for gods sake THERE WAS TAPE ON HER MOUTH. every law has a law to get around that law… i think someone should get to work on finding a way and hell if they cant freaking attack the jury deliberation already, no one wanted to screw up the case and the defense had all the cards. Yet no one defended justice.

  • guest

    you would think lying to the police at the least would be obstruction of justice and gross abuse to a corpse.

  • guest

    both of you are sick!

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    explain…because all i did was laugh at what m k wrote. that’s it

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    Double jeopardy is a procedural defense that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same, or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction.

    She was acquitted, so it’s just not possible…it’s how the law was made. don’t get mad at me for the laws our founding fathers made and such

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    Double jeopardy is a procedural defense that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same, or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction.

    She was acquitted, so it’s just not possible…it’s how the law was made. don’t get mad at me for the laws our founding fathers made and such

  • http://twitter.com/FamousZee MissZee

    Sheilaepperson opened the door on changing the subject, m k is just speaking her mind,

  • Kaycouchman14

    Shut up stupid! Get a real life moron!

  • Pat

    We all agree, in my community and everytime I go anywhere, this is the feeling that prevails. The jury either didn’t understand the concept or didn’t want to take the time to put 2 and 2 together. Scott Peterson if on death row with less circumstantial evidence!! These 12 jurors will have to live with the fact that they let a murderer go. Such ignorance ! Evidently noone had the brains to understand the instructions. After they watched the tapes from jail should have been enough to convict her. Shame on you jurors!!

  • Kcdrn3

    Juror # 3 looks like a total tranny…the transgendered community is probably recoiling in disgust! Grow a brain cell “Jennifer”! Shame on you and your illogical thinking!!

  • Anonymous

    Just through the interviews I’ve seen from this Jennifer Ford, it’s obvious that this juror (her anyway) has NO idea about serving on a jury. She seems to think that if there is NO ABSOLUTE proof, then you have to find the accused NOT guilty. They ignored the obvious links that connected Casey to this murder. I have a feeling if they had seen an actual video of the murder with Casey’s face in full view, they would have questioned whether it was her or not. Maybe NOT convicting her of first degree murder would have been o.k……………but to NOT convict her of at least CHILD NEGLECT/ABUSE is beyond imagination. To see Casey going free, with punishment for NOTHING was absolutely ridiculous. Was the jury just lazy and wanted out of there? No notes taken, probably didn’t listen that well. They also focused on George MORE than they did on Casey. During these interviews, I would have thought George was on trial……instead of Casey. And when Jennifer said in one interview “there wasn’t even proof that there was a crime.” WHAT??? A baby, duct taped, thrown into a swamp rotting, while Mommy partied and did NOTHING to find her baby, and that is NOT a crime??? This jury got side swapped doubting George……..when they didn’t want to “doubt” Casey, the one on trial. It’s ridiculous, and this jury was flat out STUPID!!!

  • jae

    The process is voir dire. Each side has a limit on who they can reject as a potential juror based on their answers to the voir dire questions. Once they both reach the limit, it is pretty much a crap shoot as to who will be on the jury or not.

  • Adriennearauz

    Jennifer Ford is one Stupid person !!!!

  • Adriennearauz

    Jennifer Ford looks like a man!!!!

  • jae

    They would have probably made him a judge.

  • Anonymous

    I thought the same. In some of Caylee’s photos she had dark circles and her eyes looked tired. I think she was drugging her at night so she didn’t have to get a babysitter. I think she was doing it for a long time….that was her Zanny the Nanny.

  • Moorem0156

    Heather they voted 12-00 It seems too me that they were all together on this vote

  • BigCaddyJC

    I’m really glad and suprised that all the venomous emotion too convict this twit remained outside of the jury box where it should exist….I’m just so amazed that 12 people from that state managed too vote with a clear mind and say and vote how they felt…sorry for the victim and the family but I think it worked well

  • Opleeze

    Wow! You are as dumb as you sound!

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities