No Baby For Jennifer Aniston NINE Months After Us Weekly “Pregnant” Cover

Truth rating: 0
(Us Weekly)

By Michael Lewittes

(Us Weekly)

Jennifer Aniston did NOT have a baby nine months after Us Weekly reported on its cover that she was “PREGNANT” and “finally going to be a mom.”

At the time, Gossip Cop was the first to exclusively report that the magazine was wrong.

According to that months-old cover story, Aniston and Justin Theroux were “waiting to share the news” about their “happy secret.”

Well, it’s been nine months now, and assuming Aniston conceived right when Us Weekly printed its cover on September 18, you would’ve thought the couple might have already wanted to share their “news” and “happy secret.”

Apparently, it was such a “secret,” not even Aniston knew about it!

Equally funny, last month after Gossip Cop again exclusively debunked an Aniston pregnancy story — this time on the cover of In Touch Us Weekly, without reference to its previous big blunder, jumped into the fray and ran a piece on its website saying the actress was “not pregnant,” according to a “source.”

Uh, was that uncredited “source” Gossip Cop?

Anyway, Us Weekly has been wrong a number of times about Aniston, including claiming she wanted to set up a photo op with Angelina Jolie, and that she and Theroux had broken up, but the “PREGNANT!” cover story may have been the most embarrassing, especially since time — and a good memory at Gossip Cop — was not the magazine’s friend.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter!

Like us on Facebook!

Enter your email address here to receive daily news updates from us.


  1. Gossip Cop
  2. Mediaite
  3. RunwayRiot
  4. The Mary Sue