<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Italian Vanity Fair Wrong About Robert Pattinson &#8220;Oh, Solo Me-oh!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/</link>
	<description>Busting bad dish!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.07</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmsm24</title>
		<link>http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>dmsm24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gossipcop.com/?p=11207#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>@dancer1: totally agree with you. You took the words directly out of my mouth :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dancer1: totally agree with you. You took the words directly out of my mouth :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kknn99</title>
		<link>http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>kknn99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gossipcop.com/?p=11207#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>Yes, really strange , why did you remove the word WRONG ?? I thought you were a reliable source ???...
Everybody knows they are together, if you can t say it outloud who will ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, really strange , why did you remove the word WRONG ?? I thought you were a reliable source ???&#8230;<br />
Everybody knows they are together, if you can t say it outloud who will ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: originaljen</title>
		<link>http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>originaljen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gossipcop.com/?p=11207#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>WOW GC.  Why did you remove the word WRONG at the end of his relationship status is off.   Who got to you? We all know he is with Kristen Stewart and it isn&#039;t just dating!  This is the most bizarre thing and anyone with a brain can&#039;t understand why with proof like The Charlie and obvious other living arrangements including HB they wouldn&#039;t want to just set the record straight.  It may be catch 22 for them, and maybe even a legal matter, but this for all appearances sheds a negative light on both of them and opens the doors for more ridiculous slander for both of them as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW GC.  Why did you remove the word WRONG at the end of his relationship status is off.   Who got to you? We all know he is with Kristen Stewart and it isn&#8217;t just dating!  This is the most bizarre thing and anyone with a brain can&#8217;t understand why with proof like The Charlie and obvious other living arrangements including HB they wouldn&#8217;t want to just set the record straight.  It may be catch 22 for them, and maybe even a legal matter, but this for all appearances sheds a negative light on both of them and opens the doors for more ridiculous slander for both of them as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dancer1</title>
		<link>http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>dancer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gossipcop.com/?p=11207#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>Any true fan knows old quotes when we see them. However, even if he recently said it, technically it wouldn&#039;t be incorrect since a &quot;single&quot; man can be engaged and/or have a girlfriend. Only married people aren&#039;t single. So what&#039;s the big deal. Unless he&#039;s married, he is a single man. Duh. That&#039;s just being technical. But anyone who has half a mind knows he&#039;s w/Kristen so really it doesn&#039;t matter what this crazy Italian mag states. No to mention, that the Vanity Fair mag in America was wrong also using old quotes from Rob. The Harper&#039;s Bazaar mag blew Vanity Fair&#039;s interview out of the water. In HB, you can read that he and Kristen are a couple w/out a doubt. So, again, if anyone wants to get technical, he is a single guy unless there&#039;s something about Rob&#039;s marital status Gossip Cop wants to share? Hmmm.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any true fan knows old quotes when we see them. However, even if he recently said it, technically it wouldn&#8217;t be incorrect since a &#8220;single&#8221; man can be engaged and/or have a girlfriend. Only married people aren&#8217;t single. So what&#8217;s the big deal. Unless he&#8217;s married, he is a single man. Duh. That&#8217;s just being technical. But anyone who has half a mind knows he&#8217;s w/Kristen so really it doesn&#8217;t matter what this crazy Italian mag states. No to mention, that the Vanity Fair mag in America was wrong also using old quotes from Rob. The Harper&#8217;s Bazaar mag blew Vanity Fair&#8217;s interview out of the water. In HB, you can read that he and Kristen are a couple w/out a doubt. So, again, if anyone wants to get technical, he is a single guy unless there&#8217;s something about Rob&#8217;s marital status Gossip Cop wants to share? Hmmm&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilyflee</title>
		<link>http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>lilyflee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gossipcop.com/?p=11207#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>dancing: are you just thick OR did you just not bother to read what was written before commenting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dancing: are you just thick OR did you just not bother to read what was written before commenting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dancing</title>
		<link>http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>dancing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gossipcop.com/?p=11207#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>is he still playing that &quot;im single, I can&#039;t get a date&quot; crap
now I think he is most likely single but the I can&#039;t get a date crap he must think his fans are complete retards, i&#039;m sure of it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is he still playing that &#8220;im single, I can&#8217;t get a date&#8221; crap<br />
now I think he is most likely single but the I can&#8217;t get a date crap he must think his fans are complete retards, i&#8217;m sure of it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.gossipcop.com/italian-vanity-fair-wrong-about-robert-pattinson-oh-solo-me-oh/#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gossipcop.com/?p=11207#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>Anything for an exclusive! Can&#039;t believe they admitted the quote is so old that it can be taken completely out of context. Looks like Conde Naste redeem themselves in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything for an exclusive! Can&#8217;t believe they admitted the quote is so old that it can be taken completely out of context. Looks like Conde Naste redeem themselves in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

