
12:48 pm, October 28th, 2009

(In Touch)
In the latest installment of, “Oh no, they didn’t,” In Touch has a cover story claiming – are you sitting? – that Brad Pitt wants to leave Angelina Jolie for his ex-wife Jennifer Aniston.
The cover piece, titled “Running Back to Jen,” makes a number of widely absurd claims. Among the most ridiculous is that when Pitt had his minor motorcycle accident on October 24, he “was on his way to a top-secret meeting with his ex-wife Jennifer Aniston.” (Yes, it was so secret that neither Pitt nor Aniston even knew about the proposed meeting.)
The rendezvous, says In Touch, was planned “via a series of coded – and often teasing – text messages.” Ooh, so cloak and dagger. According to the rag, though there was a chance Jolie would find out, “Brad clearly felt it was worth the risk.”
But alas, the motorcycle bang-up resulted in a “derailing of his meeting with Jen,” during which, reports the magazine, he was going to talk to Aniston about the men she’s been reportedly linked to because the mag says he’s “jealous.”
The article ends, “As devoted as he is to his and Angelina’s six children, his thoughts, for now, revolve around Jen.”
Well, loyal readers: It’s totally true — Pitt was in a minor motorcycle accident.
Oh, the rest? Yeah, total fiction. They did not have a “top-secret meeting” planned. They didn’t communicate “via a series of coded” messages. And Pitt is not leaving Jolie for Aniston.
In touch is seriously dilusional! They are right up there with the tabloids that print such stories as Michael Jackson was really taken by aliens! They are pretty much a garbage mag now.
I am wondering why they call the jolie-pitt children “Angelina’s kids” ? If I’m not mistaken Brad Pitt and Angelina consider the children to be THEIR children. is it because disconnecting Brad from his children makes it easier for the readers to believe the story?
oh never mind I read the quote wrong. ha! The tab is still ridiculous.
Articles like this make me wonder who comes up with this stuff at those magazines.
.
Are males actually writing this, believing that Jen Aniston’s shrinking demographic female fans hate Angelina Jolie and the children she has with Brad Pitt so much, that they actually WANT to believe these fairy tales??
.
Is it paramount to them that Jen Aniston, having been called a loser for the last 5 years, who is now officially middle-aged, with no man and no children in sight, at least be built back up, and redeemed in the minds of the public, through the lies of these trashloid national publications that ‘root for her’ by creating fairy tales in which she triumphs over the beautiful angelna and her babies??
.
Well, it’s not paramount to them, as much as it’s a STRATEGY BY JEN ANISTON’S OWN PR to redeem her. YES, they feed these angry bitter betty fairy tales to the rags. I used to work for a rag, so I know it is actually Aniston and her PR who who feed these stories to the rags. They are in their pockets. Anytime you have a story that is 5 years old, in which the main subject (aniston) has no discernble fanbase, except the jealous women who hate Jolie – and you have a tv sit-com star struggling to get deals made in Hollywood, who can’t generate interest on her own – you have the PR hacks for that person, desperately going back to the source of what put them on the map in the first place: BRAD PITT. They have come to the conclusion that the ONLY way to reverse her SCORNED WOMAN image, is to have THE PERSON THAT DID THE SCORNING, WANT HER BACK. Sure, it’s science fiction – and totally hysterically false – but this TOO, also demonstrates how she and her PR, and the ragloids insult the intelligence of who they perceive as their buyers. No one with two brain cells to rub together believes Pitt would leave Jolie for the self-made joke that is ANiston.
.
This is the only way they can now get solace, since Aniston literally has no man and no family (not even the staged faux-mances her PR arranges), through attaching her like a leech to a man and a family unit that has nothing to do with her? I mean did her double box office bomb hurt her career that much that she’s turnng back the clock to 2004? In two months it will be 2010. Aniston’s PR needs to realize that no matter what tabloids are getting kickbacks from her PR flack to write these ’scorned woman reversal,’ stories for her, it will not change her reality, or the very obvious fact that she was dumped: the main reason why this is, is not only because tabloids aren’t good enough to use as toilet paper, but main reason being, Aniston HERSELF wrote the TELL-ALL saying she was DUMPED, and trying to garner worldwide PITY. She has spent the ast 5 years bemoaning her status as a ’scorned woman,’ and wallowing in pity, as if she is the only person to get divorced and left.
.
She’s already TOLD YOU who did the dumping – she said BRAD PITT left her in her Vanity Fair tell all. Why would we disbelieve the horse’s mouth over a tabloid writer trying to appeal to Aniston’s angry bitter betty fans, of which there are obviously not that many left, or her movies wouldn’t have bombed.
.
Hey rags, you’re barking up the wrong tree, your missing a million national and international blogs, sites, and fans who would LOVE to read positive stuff on their idols Brangelina.. and for what, a couple of premiere tix to your staff to go to a crappy rom com (courtesy Aniston and her PR.) LOL
.
..and for the love of God, that picture they used of Pitt, is so unattractive that not only will you have the ‘team Aniston’ crowd going ugh, Angelina’s fanbase will want her to leave his asss too. Pitt takes about 2 bad pics a year, and why they thought putting one of them on their rag, would sell MORE issues, literally confounds me.
.
I think it’s as I posited first – this really isn’t about Brad, it’s about Aniston’s PR trying to reverse the loser image she’s cloaked herself in, and place her in a position of superiority to Angelina Jolie, you know…the most beautiful woman in the world, and Oscar winner who is the mother of Brad’s children. If you think that’s a hysterical fantastical plan, you’re right of course – however you underestimate the sheer rabid delusion that she, her PR flack Huvane, and her few friends fans (that are left) possess. All I know is, if I was a client of his, I’d want no part of that clown and his TV sit-com wannabe lame. Go out and get an agent that actually breaks a sweat for YOU, and doesn’t spend his time exacting revenge on the exes of his wealthy yet no-talent, uncharismatic lame asss’d clients. You deserve better.
Jen and her PR are at it again, to try and reverse her ‘woman scorned,’ image in the minds of the public, by going back to ‘the source,’ that they think ruined her: Brad Pitt. little do they know, Aniston ruined her own image, by portraying herself this way, crying to mags and rags and Oprah – she became the victim, the woman scorned, the ‘loser in love,’ the ‘lonely girl,’ as this 40-something recently described herself. She still is peddling pity – however her PR flack realizing he’s made a mistake using the ‘team’ strategy in getting people to feel sorry for Aniston, is now trying to REVERSE this ‘image’ of hers, by creating science fiction in which (gasp!) Brad wants her back. hahahaha. It’s so obviously lame, and insulting to anyone who lives in reality, it actually is almost funny.
Sure sure… and Pitt’s slight accident was because he was looking at the pink flying elephant… you know… he wanted to take it to the kids…
Why do I have the feeling InTouch is running against OK for the “Who sh*ts it the worst” award of all times?… Still feel sorry for the tree that was cut for them to be able to print this cr*ap on… *sigh*… poor tree…
*thumbs up* GC…
It can’t be said enough…Bauer has some sort of personal vendetta against these two that someone should investigate. It’s been non-stop Brad & Angelina bashing since 2005.
People writing essays about “evil” Jen and blaming all these articles on her are getting really really old.