Hilary Duff, Mike Comrie NOT Rekindling Romance, Despite Late And Wrong Report
Hilary Duff and Mike Comrie are not rekindling their romance after divorcing, despite a late and wrong report. Gossip Cop can exclusively correct this inaccurate claim. Again, we’re told it’s “wrong.”
According to the repeatedly disproven National Enquirer, Duff and Comrie’s “signatures on their divorce docs are barely dry,” but the ex-spouses are “falling back in love.” After claiming the actress and the retired NHL player have been “spending tons more time together than spelled out in their joint custody agreement” over their 4-year-old son Luca, a so-called “source” tells the tabloid, “Ironically, once the divorce was final, it was as if a huge burden had been lifted.” The magazine’s supposed “source” alleges that after Duff and Comrie recently had dinner together, the actress admitted “a romance is ready to rekindle… They’re giving love another go.”
Actually, the only one giving it another go is the Enquirer, which picked up a wrong report late in the game. A little more than a week ago, Gossip Cop exclusively busted a similarly untrue claim in In Touch, which falsely reported that Comrie and Duff “decided to put their differences aside,” and were going to announce in the “next few weeks” that they’ve reconciled.
It wasn’t true then, and it isn’t true now. A rep for Duff exclusively told Gossip Cop that all talk of them getting back together is “wrong.” The couple’s split was amicable, and when they’re spotted hanging out together, it’s simply because they’ve remained on good terms for Luca’s well-being.
Of course, this is not the first time Gossip Cop has debunked a Duff story in the supermarket tabloid. After she filed for divorce, the publication wrongly reported that the actress had angered Nicole Richie, who warned her husband’s ex-girfriend, “Stay away from my man!” The magazine falsely claimed Duff was trying to make “a play to win Joel back.” Much like that tall tale, the outlet’s latest story about Duff rekindling with Comrie is also untrue.