Why is it any of the Nanny’s business if he kept her home from preschool. She is 3. I don’t think it matters if she misses a day to spend some time with her dad.

my co-worker’s ex-wife makes $67 every hour on the laptop. She has been without a job for 8 months but last month her paycheck was $7909 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this web site… LazyCash10.com

You’re right. But does that give him the right to shove her into a door while shes holding the baby?

The nanny was out of line!! Halle is taking this to dam far!! Just let him see his daughter!!!

I also think that Halle is pulling out every and any trick she can, remember when not so long ago she blamed Gabriel in racism? They were together for years, had a child together, and now suddeny he is a racist?
I think Halle is angry that Gabriel don’t give up on their child!

How is Halle taking it too far? The story says the nanny went to his house because she was supposed to pick up the kid from school and she was a no-show. You’d think Dad would have had the courtesy to tell someone that he kept her home.

I don’t understand why people are bringing up Halle. This story specifically says Halle was not involved. It’s fined that he wanted to keep Nahla home from preschool, but I agree that he should gage told the person hired to take care of her what was going on. He did not have the right to put his hands on her, especially not when she is holding little Nahla

fine* have*

(stupid autocorrect)

True, he is her father and is responsible for her. But if the nanny was supposed to pick her up at school and she was not there, it would be worrisome and then she just wanted to know where she was. He should not have gotten physical and as stated above, Halle Berry has nothing to do with this and should not be blamed.

So, she walked into the house, grabbed his child and demanded that he answer to her? Have we heard his defense?

Halle is crackers.

Ridiculous response! He has respect issues! Halle was not present… she PAYS someone to care for her daughter, to see after her. REGARDLESS if he is her father, there is a REASON the judge declared that he NOT be allowed UN-SUPERVISED visits!!! So to keep her home from school two days and not alert anyone was WRONG! Period! He has an attitude. NO ONE knows the inside TRUTH about why they didn’t make it – but for a judge to tell him he MUST be supervised… that has to make you go…hmmmm

You’re silly… she wasn’t even there… so now she’s to blame because HE’S disrespectful and aggressive? Yeah… right.

The assault on his character in the immediate aftermath of their break up was indicative of some smarmy PR to smear his name so that she could get sympathy. It was so heavy handed, that is why people are linking her to this ridiculous story which reeks of extortion or entrapment. A nanny shows up at his house, grabs his daughter and questions his authority? She should have been fired.

I too agree, I don’t think the father did anything wrong. I wouldn’t doubt it if Halle is paying this “nannie” money to report these things. and…Halle is being brought up because of the way she didn’t allow the father to see his daughter after their split. From what was reported, and I understand that you can’t always believe what is reported, but from what was reported by various media sites, Halle threatened to have his daughter taken away because of what seemed like little to no reason at all. I just don’t understand how she could be so happy with him at one point, enough to have a child, and the next she’s absolutely in hell, threatening to take his child away. Sounds like a DIVA to me. No thanks. Think of your child instead of yourself! And if I’m wrong…so be it. I’ll be the first to admit it, but this is just my opinion.

A three year old goes to school usually because the parents are working or unavailable during those hours. Sometimes 2 or 3 days a week for a few hours for socialization. However, if Gabriel was able to spend time with his little girl that day, I can understand why he would not send her to school. Did he forget to let the Nanny know of this change? Perhaps. Seems like that. I can see the nanny going to the daycare and learning Nahla did not come in that day. At that point I wonder why didn’t the nanny simply CALL Gabriel??? She was probably ticked off she was not alerted.

Now I have a several questions that complicate this story:

In their custody agreement, didn’t Halle request that a nanny that SHE selected be with Nahla whenever Gabriel had his little girl? Does anyone know if this is still in effect? That seems to be a highly unusual agreement in a situation like theirs, and I can totally see Gabriel resenting it. This may have been a passive-aggressive attempt to bypass this agreement. IF it is still in effect, I assume the nanny came to the residence and insisted he follow this agreement. Yes, there may have been shouting since Gabriel resents having his parenting abilities questioned. But it is also a “he said, she said”, no? Also why was THREE year old Nahla in the nanny’s ARMS when they were arguing? (I wonder if the nanny sides with Halle?) Was the nanny setting him up? Who knows.

I don’t know any of the characters in this child custody situation: Halle, Gabriel, Nahla or the nannies. But I can not fathom that Gabriel is a danger and needs adult supervision by a nanny whenever he has contact with Nahla. I feel this is probably Halle being vindictive, and I can understand the anger he feels. If the supervision provision is no longer in effect, then the nanny was overstepping her role as an employee.

P.S. I only bring up Halle because of the custody agreement and how that may have played a part in this altercation.