comScore
  1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Busting bad dish!

EXCLUSIVE: Jessica Simpson fights back over Star magazine’s Tiger Woods cover; Gossip Cop has legal letter

Truth rating: 10

EXCLUSIVE DOCUMENTS!
(Star magazine)

(Star magazine)

Earlier in the week, Gossip Cop was the first outlet to expose how the Star’s cover story, linking Jessica Simpson to Tiger Woods, didn’t get anything right other than essentially spelling their names correctly.

And while there was talk that Simpson might seek a legal remedy from the tabloid, Gossip Cop has now EXCLUSIVELY obtained a letter (page 1, page 2, page 3) that the singer’s lawyer shot off to Star asking for, among other things, a retraction.

The letter, addressing the cover story, which was titled, “Tiger & Jessica – The Shocking Inside Story,” begins: “The most ‘shocking’ thing about the Story is Star’s reckless and reprehensible attempt to sell magazines by falsely implicating Ms. Simpson in the current controversy surrounding Tiger Woods’s extra-marital activities, despite the absolute absence of any factual basis to do so.”

And it gets tougher.

According to the legal letter, “Star’s false ‘factual’ assertions in the Story, and the deliberate implications created thereby, are founded on nothing more than rumor, gossip and innuendo spread by supposed ‘source’ that, if they do exist, lack sufficient confidence in their statements to risk public attribution. As such, Star’s publication of the Story constitutes defamation under New York law and finds no protection in the First Amendment.”

Simpson’s attorney then notes that he’s writing on Simpson’s behalf to “demand that Star cease and desist from is (sic) continued dissemination of the Story, and that it publish a prominent retraction.”

The lawyer also boldly states that “every accusation in the Story concerning Ms. Simpson’s supposed interactions with Mr. Woods is entirely false.”

He adds, “The obvious and intended import of the magazine cover, photographs and captions – - i.e., that Ms. Simpson and Mr. Wood (sic) engaged in some sort of illicit relationship – - is not only false, it is utterly beyond the pale or responsible journalism and provides an additional basis for a defamation claim against Star under New York law. Rather than reporting actual events or legitimate news, Star obviously presented and is exploiting the Story for the sole purpose of increasing sales of its magazine by maliciously forcing Ms. Simpson into the glare of the current media scrutiny of Mr. Woods’s personal life.”

Additionally, Simpson’s attorney said the cover story was a “rehashing of supposed events that allegedly occurred more than five months ago, and would hardly constitute ‘news’ – - in any sense of the word – - but for Star’s baseless attempt to link those stale events to the current scandal surrounding Mr. Woods.”

The strongly worded three-page letter ends with “Ms. Simpson hereby demands that Star immediately cease dissemination of the Story and publish a prominent and unambiguous retraction,” but if the magazine doesn’t, “Simpson reserves the right to pursue any and all appropriate avenues of legal redress against Star, and all other responsible parties.”

Gossip Cop sent a note to Star’s attorney, asking for a comment, but we have yet to receive a response.

Follow @GossipCop on Twitter and check out GossipCop.com for the most ACCURATE celebrity news!

You might like:


  • The Goon

    Ok so I’m kind of gullible and naive, and I know it, so I am not ashamed to ask why Star magazine thinks people will not notice their glaring errors and constant deceptions?

    When I was young, I honestly believed that most of what they reported was true. Now that I am getting older and have watch them contradict themselve (with quotes and story lines found on the COVERS of their own magazine no les) from week to week, I am just beginning to wonder how it is Star magazine stays afloat with its pathetic reporting, poor writing, and terrible lying.

    In short, they suck. Why doesn’t someone shut them down? What’s the deal? If they tried even just a little bit they wouldn’t suck half as bad. Why don’t they even try? What’s wrong with them?

  • pooperscooper

    GO Jessica & thanks Gossip Cop..

    Take it to the top Jessica. It’s about time after all the garbage this year printed by tabloids about you. Total nonsense. Were not all perfect but the media’s treatment of you for there own promotion & the disgust in the way they do it needs to be put back in there place. Star has stepped over the line way too many times.

    It’s about time some of these tabloids when articles like this are written that they are forced to back it by naming sources.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Funkadellic/627003464 Michael Funkadellic

    in particular i think it warrants stating that what this claim is in essence is a claim of adultery against Jessica Simpson just as much as the admissions of adultery by all those women soo far.
    It never ceases to amaze me at how these sluts root around with married men with small kids undermining these families and then reporting it as if they are in the third person and it was all some unstoppable incident they happened to get caught up in.
    Sure Tiger obviousely has issues that need to be addressed professionally which have motivated his extra marital affairs, but how can all these soo called well connected women just carry on having sex with prime clients and customers and keep their jobs ?
    its no different to stealing off the wife and kids.
    why is it we do not hear some moral judgments on these women ?
    has the worm turned soo far that now women are excused for knowingly cheating & home wrecking ?
    what message does this send to young women ?
    it tells your teenagers that if they commit adultery with a rich man they can then flaunt it all over the media for large amounts of money.
    crikey ! … what do your teen age girls think about this matter ? is it just another day in the life and perfectly normal acceptable behaviour ?
    why is there no jokes about the women being town bikes etc… ?
    ignoring the wrongs committed by these women is validating the disenfranchise of womens self determination and accountability.

Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities
X