I wish them well.

Maybe they will be engaged until good press is needed and then they will elope!

To WTF: WTF back at you. Explanation: Interviewer asks a question then reply is given. Their aging? A problem for all of us, I believe. Playing the media? Well, when the trash magazines stop paying the paps huge sums in order for you to buy… when the legitimate press stops reporting legitimate news of celebrity happenings… and when the people you love to hate continue living their lives better than most of us… But whatever will you do with all that hate? That’s a rhetorical question but then wtf.

I love how people like you pretend celebrities don’t feed these trash tabloids, that this is somehow something they do not participate in. People will stop writing about BRANDgelina as soon as they stop inviting us into their lives 24/7. Just to promote Benjamin Button, they talked about their sex life, published private family photos of their kids, photos of Angelina breastfeeding, photos of a naked Angelina taking a shower.

For their engagement they made the jeweler designer available for a million interviews even though everyone else around them usually has to sign confidentiality agreements. They gave People mag an exclusive on how the proposal went down, had Angie pose with the ring in front of the paps even though she was walking out of a building that had a secret entrance so she could skip the pap parade. The next day they gave the paps a heads up to where they were going on vacation so the paps could get there BEFORE them to get pictures of them arriving. They took the paps along on a “romantic” boat ride, invited them to photograph their beach time with the kids instead of having security chase them away, literally every minute of this engagement vacation was conveniently photographed by the paps. Apparently through no fault of their own. LOL

It’s funny how they manage to disappear for months at a time, but when they have something to promote like a film or an engagement, they conveniently can’t seem to get any privacy while their loons blame others for this “loss of privacy”.

My point is they willingly feed the tabloid machine. And they happily feed the people at CNN too.

Your remark about the photos is hilarious and ironic considering no one has done more to up the price of photos than these two. $35 million just for baby photos. Funny how they never tried to pass the privacy laws they have in Europe making it illegal to publish photos of celebrity children, but chose instead to make celebrity photo business thrive beyond anyone’s wildest dreams. If you have a problem with the tabloid photo business take it up with Brad and Angelina.

As is characteristic of you detractors, your comments are based solely on purported news with misinformation, misread and misinterpreted by your kind and questionable in taste. Point: Europe does not have laws but does discourage intrusion and Europeans are not people whom enjoy said intrusions and lies but do respect the privacy of celebrities. Do you really believe that the Jolie/Pitts are so damn powerful that they can control coverage anyway? As for the ” tabloids” ( read gossip) what the hell do you think the paps and those questionable rags do but to make money ? nothing wrong with that, of course, but the Jolie/Pitts certainly don’t need attention nor have they ever asked for it or in any way encouraged it. Since the majority of shots of them going about their (and anyone else’s) normal
life in walking down a street, getting in a car, etc., etc. is hardly publicity seeking, so why your vitriol? They have stated explicitly that they are fair game for attention as celebrities but their children should be left alone. My God, Ms Jolie can’t exit a building? And how absurd that you would even comment on it. or suggest otherwise. You seem to believe the speculation, projections, assumptions of the GOSSIP mags whom have always been suspect about whomever they write about. They’re hardly known for truth in reporting. How naive for you to presume otherwise. Also, you seem to be disadvantaged in your knowledge that a majority of photos taken are with long lenses., or candid shots sold to your assumed legitimate news sources. Family photos are arranged and photographed by
legitimate magazines with money paid to the Jolie/Pitts and donated to their charities. I rather think that taken by intruders and sold to “press” sources to make money is preferable. Arrangement for persons of note arriving anywhere advance preparations must be planned and the site authorities must prepare (with photographers) accordingly. The engagement ring was shot by a private person at a private art show attended by the Jolie/Pitts and subsequently sold to one of your tabs, It was picked up by your tabloids, Procop was interviewed (Pitt made no announcement at all, mind you), and spoke accordingly. Your questionable point re signing a confidential agreement is then contradictory since how could Pitt even think about the succeeding feeding frenzy. What is questionable in this is my taking time to try correcting (ha!) the prejudices of you and your denigrating others. The more fool me but in turn the more a-holed you.

I’m not going to bother going through this nonsense point by point because I have learned you can win an argument with a loon. There just is no reality there, but good grief how you try to sound intelligent, but come off like a pretentious idiot instead, much like Pitt himself.

I’ll just point out the end as an example.

“Your questionable point re signing a confidentiality agreement is then contradictory…”

What the hell? I mentioned the Jeweler didn’t have to sign one even though all the bodyguards, nannies, contractors and anyone else who comes into close proximity to them for long periods of time have to. Not sure what that has to do with the person asking Pitt questions.

“And since how could Pitt even think about the succeeding media frenzy?

First point: This is NOT the correct use of the word succeeding. Try using “ensuing” next time.

Second point: Pitt didn’t know there would be a media frenzy about the engagement because he suddenly forgot he was famous?

Seriously, you loons are so far off the charts when it comes to defending them, I just want to thank you for the pure entertainment value.

WTF

I don’t think Brad and Angelina “pocketed $22 million” from the baby photos. They gave away $13 million THAT WE KNOW ABOUT…….and doesn’t the American government take 50% or more in taxes?

I pretend nothing. I protest all prejudice, misinformation, lies and name calling. Your specious reasoning(?), ad hominem attacks and repeated untrue information makes further comment ridiculous.
The Jolie-Pitts will continue to enjoy their life, their family, caring and giving to others. They could care less re any attacks — or any defense on my part. So enjoy your hate and prejudice, WTF and I will continue loving and caring in my time. Ta.

GET SOME HELP..SOOOON!!!!

Looking like a lot of makeup and airbrushing. He is so fake. It wasnt that long ago that they were denying engagement rumors. Funny enough the only one benefitting form the engagement is brad Pitt as he is promoting a movie. The more he talks the more he lies but also the more he makes Angelina look like a dufus for being with someone so superficial.

For the same reason you post negative articles about other celebrities so please get off your high horse and stop pretending you’re better than the rest of us. We get enough of that from BRANDgelina.

Who gives a Sh*t…but you and a few other LOSERS…Grow Up.

I cannot image having no life and being so consumed by Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie to your degree.
Must be hell for you.

There is nothing superficial about Brad Pitt. He has also aged naturally unlike most celebs. You worship the real fraud and media manipulator Aniston. It is his job to promote his movie and he keeps being asked about his personal life. He did not lie about anything. All he said, was that he doesn’t have a date set for the wedding yet. There were tons of misreports claiming he was going to tie the knot in August. He had to comment on that because there would have been a paparazzi frenzy in August for no reason. He has done nothing but enhance Angelina Jolie’s life and integrity as a person.

I can post a long essay addressing each of your nonsense points but I have addressed this before in other articles.

The paps target them wherever they go. The tabloid machine will attack and exploit them no matter what they do or say. They are allowed like any celebrity to have their true fans to have some real access to their life instead of letting the media completely brainwash people with their distorted depiction and constant slanderous accounts that make them an object of obsessive unfounded hatred from fanatics and tabloids whores such as yourself. They do not invite us into their lives 24/7. They try to balance the best out of this horrid situation and unwanted exploitation as much as they can. Most of the coverage is negative overexposure and they have to constantly fight for some privacy. They don’t have the capacity for privacy that most other celebrities have because the media doesn’t allow that. Most of this coverage is detrimental and feeds into negativity.

Most of their pics are candids. Any real informer observer can tell the difference between candids versus staged photos. They are the targets of overexposure. Most of it is negative, out of control, and unwanted. They don’t invite paps and it is sick for you to even suggest that considering what an oppressive presence this has become for them. You ignore the fact that Aniston has a more controlled dynamic with the media when they only photograph her at convenient times with her current staged romance or that one year where we got countless bikini pics. With Pitt-Jolie, it is snippets of their daily lives with their children or just attending a premiere or promoting a movie blown way out of proportion with circulation being overexposed because that is the standard the media set for them. It has been like this for Brad since 1994.

By the way, the paps were at ALL entrances. Brad and Angelina don’t attend most of the events and parties they are invited to. They do the bare minimum that is necessary yet they still get attacked. Neither of them do any more interviews than most celebrities and they actually make far less public appearances

They use their security guards and try to keep a low profile as much as they can in their daily lives when necessary. Their haters sometimes attack their security guards for being overprotective and now you are spinning it, in the other direction. Either way, they get attacked. It is their duty to promote their films and their causes. They, like most celebrities in the A-list need to allow at least some real access to their real lives instead of letting people be completely brainwashed by sleazy stories.

Also, it is such a lie to pretend their careers and worth to the world don’t warrant this attention. Their careers and position in the industry warranted their A-list position way before they even became a couple. You are delusional to trash their careers and the impact they have had. It is other undeserving celebs like Aniston and Handler who have gained status over their brand.

You are exaggerating accounts over one photoshoot by ignoring the fact they don’t do nearly as many personal exposes or photoshoots as most of their A-list peers. Even CW stars engage in far more PR than they do. They are protecting themselves from excessive exploitation and protecting the threat against their children by taking those measures. They do not constantly talk about their sex lives, what the hell are you talking about?!
Angelina since being with Brad, has shown more class and restraint with her sexuality.

Your account of the privacy laws in Europe is NOT even true. The media will travel everywhere to stalk them for photos and publish nasty stories. The majority of the media targets them with negative depictions filled with ugly lies and you act like this is beneficial for them. It is hell for them but they have to accomodate it to a certain extent to maintain their careers and not surrender to it completely. The majority of the media has a favorable Team Aniston bias and every outlet targets, trashes, and villifies them by promoting misconceptions and false claims to the extreme. You don’t question how Aniston managed to calculate this dynamic over a false accusation using a premise of a sin the media has never been so self-righteous against considering how many celebrity couples have actually committed the act. CNN is not as nasty as the others, so of course, you have to spin that as something else when most of the media coverage has been biased AGAINST them and favoring Aniston with puff pieces.

Their staff has to sign confidentiality agreements to protect their privacy and prevent slander. The jeweler did not do a hundred interviews. He issued several statements to the media and it got circulated by a thousand media outlets. They did not create a frenzy around their engagement, the media did. They would have to announce and discuss their engagement regardless especially with their complicated circumstances to explain why they had to change their stance on getting married.

Everything about them will get spun by you in a negative way. You call them PR whores and then you even trash them for being private too. Every point of yours included some lies. They get photographed on a weekly basis regardless of whether they have a movie out or not. Then you trash them for the brief periods when there is not excessive PR. They are targets and constantly have to deal with an invasion of privacy. They are handling it the best way they can. No other celebrity couple has to deal with this has much as they have to. They have to deal with the worst the media has to offer.

You are the epitome of a true loon and deeply deluded minion.

Well Said Anon…Truly,Compliment’s to you.

better check your “facts”, the NY’er isn’t known as respectable. You honestly say that then show proof. The NY’er is a tabloid, you are confusing mags. They made 17 million on the first pic, all was donated to their charity. By the way, the person from the NY mag stated he was not talking about Angie or Brad, just a status on fame. You read articles wrong.