Funny how she has to become one of those “I’m ENGAGED” people. I thought she was above all that. Guess not.

Also, anyone who’s ever been to The Roosevelt Hotel knows they have a side entrance for celebs. She could have slipped in and out without these photos being taken. She really is the second coming of Kim Kardashian. Gonna milk this engagement for ALL the PR she can.

Emerald cut is the most unflattering cut for a diamond as opposed to other cuts because it lacks the faucets catching the light.

Had to be a “diamond of the finest quality” bc my girl Angelina is of the “finest quality”! About time! Goodness! had almost decided to sit as I was getting tired of standing and waiting…. Whew! haha! I just Love, Love, Love my Brangelina and I mean that in the most nicest of ways! Yeah Buddy!!

Congrats to Angie and Brad. The ring is gorgeous. Her’s and Jessica Biel’s are the two I’ve liked the best recently.

Fake anonymous – you are just a bitter, hater. I feel sorry for people like you who cannot say something nice. Such negativity is not heathy.

Fake anonymous – that’s difference between me and hateful people like you I have never said anything mean spirited or hateful about Anistin or any celebrity for that matter.

Yes I am not a fan of Anstin even before she and brad marry. I just don’t go to her thread because I am not interested in what she does or who she’s dating or not. I don’t believe in being hateful.

Don’t believe everything you read. Angie has been working for children for over 10 years before she got together with brad and before all the publicity. Do you believe all the stories written about your precious Jen Anistin – a bet not. You people are just ready and willing to believe all the negative things written about Angelina. I am proud to be a fan and yes I believe she s a sincere good person.

You mean the FACETS? A diamond of that size would blind everyone if it caught the light! You should be so lucky as to have a ring like that!

when are all the rags going to go on and on about ‘one carat for each kid’. GC-I am surprised you posted some of those pic, considering you are a big time brangelina lover-her hands look AWFUL! Why do some of you have to attack others??? people are allowed their own views, even if they do not agree with your? It is amazing how vocal and nasty posters get when they are not face to face with others.

In the future, I will obviously have to change my name because this poster is specifically degrading me by using the title I used to always use. Don’t believe anything the fake Anonymous has to say. Even when I made the distinction, she continues to do this and uses the same false, trashy concept.

These “opinions” are slanderous, destruction, and ignite wrongful flaming against Brad & Angelina over gossip, lies, false accusations, and corrupt journalism by using tons of offensive misconceptions. Decent people will defend them over it on a site like Gossip Cop unlike other sites which are overwhelmed with ignorant people who believe tabloids and media spin at its worst. You are also a hypocrite, considering you hate Pitt-Jolie and post ugly attacks against them. This point of view is inflammatory, not based on truth, and it has had a toxic impact on the world so people are speaking out against it here because they have integrity and a better understanding of the truth. People like us are in the minority. You are being hypocritical considerng it is the majority of people who were brainwashed into being tabloid sheep and nasty Fanistons who constantly attack people as delusional and have used every degrading insult in the book against people who just speak the truth as well as defend people who deserve it. They overtake most site discussions and we rarely speak out. We were civil and quiet. We are reacting to the majority of flamers like you who go by a entire belief system and unfounded hatred based on a lie. Or even if we just express well-wishes, we get harassed.

The difference is that Aniston is benefitting from all of this cycle of sleaze and contradictory viewpoints that she helped created a dynamic to exploit. I don’t have to respect or like her and the difference is, is that I am actually reacting to the truth about her personality & behavior while the other haters react to misportrayals & deceit against Pitt-Jolie.

You are so ridiculous and kept spouting the same fallacies over & over again. It is sheer stupidity for you to compare her to Kim Kardashian. Angelina is a media target and the paps follow her around aggressively everywhere no matter what she does or where she goes. Brad and Angelina are the most highly stalked celebs and their prestige/acclaim is well-founded. These are credible A-list accomplished celebs and it has been that way for both of them way before they got together.

She is not flaunting her engagement. She is living her life and traveling. The paps will always get pictures of her and got to extreme lengths to get it. She can’t let this ruin or control her life. These are candids of her just living her life and yet people are harassing her over nothing. The paps were at the side entrance too. Most of the attention is negative overexposure she doesn’t want or need, but she has to live with it.

Fake Anonymous: I wanted to reply to her under that comment but I couldn’t. This is directed towards her last comment.

First of all, you are the one who posts hateful crap against Brad & Angelina that is NOT true and based on deceit & yellow journalism. Some people here actually recognize the truth behind the true media manipulative mastermind & PR puppet-master Jennifer Aniston.

It is called operating on a corrupt media bandwagon and press agenda to exploit for the highest profit & influence over spin power. The fact that it came from The New Yorker and New York Magazine doesn’t make a difference especially when Team Aniston is a tabloid-commodity that the majority of the corrupt press supports because it is THEIR creation and cash cow. It is the content and actual information that matter, not where it comes from. A so-called presitigious magazine and newspaper can be just as slanderous, inflammatory, and inaccurate as a third-rate magazine. If you haven’t noticed, most of the press has a pro-Team Aniston bias and idiots like you would never question the real reason behind it. They go by what sells the most and they know the masses got deeply brainwashed by this pseudo-scandal in 2005.

Why don’t you ask yourself why The New Yorker just like most media outlets print info that is proven to be false once you actually do research on her humanitarian work, why they favor Aniston, uses tabloids as source materials, uses misquotations that were denied, and uses plants/sources from Jennifer Aniston’s social clique and PR team. Why doesn’t the media ruthlessly attack the many celebs who are manipulative and have actually committed scandals that were confirmed over the years to this extent? Why do they usually give most celebs the benefit of the doubt when many celebs have been moved on with co-stars after tabloid gossip about affairs when Pitt had a good reputation of being moralistic, they had no evidence of an affair, and they chose to rabidly crucify Pitt-Jolie by going by tabloids as well as only Aniston’s version when there were many holes in her claims that don’t add up.

The media is inherently corrupt and the fact is…the more people buy into it….the more it increases and more magazines, websites, and newspapers participate in this spin and misportrayal. That doesn’t mean it is correct.

You are a vapid, shallow fool. People like you make this media corruption thrive and the people who actually use PR tactics and dirty political methods like Aniston get to profit at good people’s expense. Your negative comments about Angelina are not true and your hateful flaming is wrong. I won’t serve as a tool for the sleazy press or the actress who really abused the system by playing the dirty media game effectively, Jennifer Aniston.

Also, nobody would be mentioning Jennifer Aniston on this article comment section if the Fanistons didn’t come here on the Pitt-Jolie articles and started flaming them with deep misconceptions. You are blind to the true conniving con-artist who is obsessed with having a high, elevated PR/Image she doesn’t deserve, Aniston. Blindly supporting who the corrupt media supports is not intelligent or moral at all. They based their portrayals on what sells and Aniston helped them validate the most powerful pseudo-scandal that has the most investment from the public. I checked out those articles years ago and it reeks of inaccurate statements and biases that come from invalid sources.

I am a Native New Yorker and at 48 years old I can tell you The New Yorker is full of shit…much like you.
Get a life!

I read it and it was full of crap. That article had as much credibility as Star or US Weekly which it used as some of its sources. Just because New York Magazine printed it, doesn’t mean it is true. They sell garbage against Brad and Angelina because it is profitable. Almost every media outlet jumped on that bandwagon because the masses bought into this yellow journalism. You are such an elitist, to think that is true just because that magazine printed it. Journalists from all sources can be scumbags, they care about money & not truth.

You forget that Angelina was famous, accomplished, and was a humanitarian & mother before Brad Pitt. She won an Oscar and was already an A-lister before Brad. It is the media who has created a profitable brand
against Brad & Angelina when they sold a false accusation against them which Aniston supported. It is a sick dynamic and they will villify Angelina who is their target. You also ignore the quality of their films and success way before Brad & Angelina came to fruition.

It is also a lie. She had been in People Magazine articles and covers, TEN years BEFORE Brad Pitt. Were you living in a cave for over a decade before 2005?

It is also ironic and twisted, because you refuse to apply this logic to Jennifer Aniston who is the one who abused a brand by using Brad Pitt. She was not an A-lister before Brad. She did not have this Golden girl image before Brad.
She had no relevance in worlwide power status before Brad. The media did
not worship her with this image and wonderful depiction of her personality
before Brad. She was not uber-popular with this worldwide attention and acclaim before Brad. She was not America’s Sweetheart before Brad and the press did NOT favor her before Brad. None of Aniston’s movies or her real looks ( before she started getting work done) had any merit or acclaim before Brad. Her personality did not have this image and she was not Queen Bee of the Hollywood Elite until she married Brad & got those connections.

She was never on Forbes Most Powerful or People’s Most Beautiful and didn’t receive most of those titles before Brad. She became a powerhouse
after Brad Pitt who ALREADY had all of those things.

She would never have appeared on Vogue, Vanity Fair, and all of those magazines that used to have prestige before Brad. She would not have even been invited to the Oscars before Brad. Did you forget how it was for Aniston before Brad. Yes, she had fame & popularity because of FRIENDs but it was at a B-list level. It was all to a much lower extent. She was the “it girl” for maybe a year when the show broke out and you had the “Rachel” cut but gradually that faded and it became more about the show, than her.

She did not have this image or PR before Brad. Aniston crafted this attention
by exploiting Brad Pitt’s brand from the beginning. Even back then, I knew
she was playing him and didn’t truly respect or love him despite him giving
her everything she wanted but that was never good enough. Then it
when it became advantageous, she chose to destroy him. Brad had all of the
fan loyalty, respect, admiration, love, and goodwill from the public until
Aniston ruined his reputation because she wanted to stay in the A-list with
that wonderful PR/Image.

You need to base your attitude on truth and facts. What the media depicts most of the time is not reality. Aniston is so beloved with this good girl image
because of the tabloids and because of using Brad. Then she had to tear
Brad & Angelina down to make herself look good & be relevant to the
world who would have just remembered from that girl from that sitcom.

Wow, you need to get a life. At least the other anonymous is quoting The New Yorker. The New Yorker is probably the most reputable magazine in the world. You’re just some nut job spouting crap you pull out of thin air. “Looking Good” is an article that appeared in the New Yorker several weeks ago and it was pretty clear about the fact that Jolie and Pitt use their charity work for image purposes. The New York Magazine article was pretty clear about the fact that the relationship is the centerpiece of their entire brand.

Also, I find it hilarious that you spout all of this self-righteous crap about haters and such, while you’re busy flaming your hatred on countless Aniston articles day after day.

Wait a minute. I know who you are. You were posting these long diatribes that went on and one and on and people called you out on it. YOU were posting under a different name a few months ago and now want to claim my anonymous handle.

Guest99, I support and agree with you. Just to clarify, this comment was directed towards Fake anonymous who is impersonating me.

i am so tired of hearing about angelina and brad they had adulteres sex and ruined a marriage and now after living together for a long time finaly a engagement . come on these ppl have a sick and twisted life . a real goo example to our kids , not.

Reputable. This is the magazine that had to recant a story and supposed pic of Jolie breastfeeding Shiloh and changing her diaper in public, which turned out to be fake. It didn’t state that Jolie and Pitt used their charity for image purposes. It was an article about a man that has worked with them as well as many other celebrities to find a cause that they can work with. He connects celebrities with charities they would be interested in and it helps the charity by bringing attention to their cause. You totally read and twisted the story totally wrong to try to fit your agenda.

You loonistons CLING to that New York Times article like white on rice. But that article was RECANTED and the Editor apologized for it as it was a hoax, and full of rubbish.

I feel so sorry for you, an obviously hate-filled ignorant and immoral person, that the ONLY thing you have is a DEBUNKED AND RETRACTED article! You’re so sad and pathetic.

“How would YOU like a break up thrown in YOUR face EVERY SINGLE DAY for the REST OF YOUR LIFE? Jennifer HAS moved on”

Newsflash! Aniston’s marriage break up is out there because SHE is the one who throws it in OUR face, JUST TO PROMOTE HER MOVIES. For EIGHT long years, Aniston has talked nonstop about her marriage, every interview she does she references it in some way, she is MILKING it for all its worth with her talk shows about her divorce, her crying to vanity Fair, her pity parties etc etc. HOW DARE YOU tell US to give *her* a break and make her out to be the victim, when ANISTON IS THE ONE MILKING HER DIVORCE FOR SYMPATHY AND A CAREER. She has coat-tailed Brad and Angelina for 8 years, so DON’T YOU FUCKING *DARE* insinuate that SHE has moved on and we haven’t, when ANISTON IS THE ONE WHO HAS NOT MOVED ON and she CONTINUES to USE HER BREAKUP TO GET PUBLICITY FOR HERSELF. You really need to get your facts straight, wake up and see reality, get real and grow up yourself. Because that we are still talking about Aniston’s ONLY REDEEMING FEATURE, her *divorce*, is ONLY BECAUSE ANISTON HERSELF WON’T STOP TALKING ABOUT IT, so get it right will you!